Journal of Voice
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 72-85 , January 2010

Using Electroglottographic Real-Time Feedback to Control Posterior Glottal Adduction during Phonation

  • Christian T. Herbst

      Affiliations

    • Tölzer Knabenchor, Munich/Germany, Herbert-von-Karajan-Platz, Salzburg, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Christian T. Herbst, MA, Herbert-von-Karajan-Platz 2/2/2, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
  • ,
  • David Howard

      Affiliations

    • Department of Electronics, University of York, Heslington, York, England
  • ,
  • Josef Schlömicher-Thier

      Affiliations

    • Austrian Voice Institute, Wallersee, Austria

,Accepted 9 June 2008.

References 

  1. Garcia M. Traité complet de l'art du chant. Paris: Schott1847. Reprint New York: Da Capo Press, 1975.
  2. Bless D, Hirano M, Feder R. Videostroboscopic evaluation of the larynx. Ear Nose Throat J. 1987;66:
  3. Södersten M, Hertegærd S, Hammarberg B. Glottal closure, airflow, and voice quality in middle-aged women as related to changes in loudness. Karolinska Institute, Huddinge University Hospital Phoniatric and Logopedic Progress Report. 1994;9:3–20.
  4. Herbst C, Svec J, Qiu Q, et al. Overall and posterior glottal adduction in singing. 7th Pan-European Voice Conference PEVOC7. Proceedings of the 7th Pan-European Voice Conference PEVOC7, 96–97. 2007; Groningen, the Netherlands.
  5. Rothenberg M. A multichannel electroglottograph. J Voice. 1992;6:36–43
  6. Frokjaer-Jensen B, Thorvaldsen P. Construction of a Fabre Glottograph. Vol. 3. Copenhagen, Danmark: Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen; 1968;Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics of the University of Copenhagen1–8
  7. Fourcin A, Abberton E. First application of a new laryngograph. Med Biol Illus. 1971;21:172–182
  8. Fabre P. Une perocédé électrique d'inscription de l'accolement glottique au course de la phonation: Glottographie de haute fréquence. Bulletin de l'Académie Nationale de Médicine. 1957;141:66–69
  9. Baken RJ, Orlikoff RF. Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice. 2nd ed.. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing, Thompson Learning; 2000;
  10. Baken RJ. Electroglottography. J Voice. 1992;6:98–110
  11. Kitzing P. Clinical applications of electroglottography. J Voice. 1990;4:238–249
  12. Colton RH, Conture EG. Problems and pitfalls in electroglottography. J Voice. 1990;4:10–24
  13. Howard DM. Practical voice measurement. In:  Harris T,  Harris S,  Rubin JS,  Howard DM editor. The Voice Clinic Handbook. London: Whurr Publishing Company; 1998;p. 323–380
  14. Baer T, McGarr NS. Laryngeal vibrations: a comparison between high-speed filming and glottographic techniques. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983;73:1304–1308
  15. Childers D, Naik JM, Larar JN, Krishnamurthy AK, Moore GP. Electroglottography, speech, and ultra-high speed cinematography. In:  Titze IR,  Scherer RC editor. Vocal Fold Physiology: Biomechanics, Acoustics and Phonatory Control. Denver: The Denver Center for the Performing Arts; 1985;p. 203–220
  16. Rothenberg M. Some relations between glottal air flow and vocal fold contact area. In:  Ludlow CL,  Hart MO editor. Proceedings of the Conference on the Assessment of Vocal Pathology. American Speech and Hearing Association; 1981;p. 88–96ASHA Rep. No 11
  17. Rothenberg M, Mahshie J. Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area. J Speech Hear Res. 1988;31:338–351
  18. Howard DM. Variation of electrolaryngographically derived closed quotient for trained and untrained adult female singers. J Voice. 1995;9:163–172
  19. Herbst C, Ternström S. A comparison of different methods to measure the EGG contact quotient. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2006;31:126–138
  20. Titze IR. A four-parameter model of the glottis and vocal fold contact area. Speech Commun. 1989;8:191–201
  21. Titze IR. Interpretation of the electroglottographic signal. J Voice. 1990;4:1–9
  22. Scherer R, Rockwell B. Examination of the laryngeal adduction measure EGGW. In:  Bell-Berti F,  Raphael LJ editor. Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues for Katherine Safford Harris. Woodbury, NY: AIP Press; 1995;p. 269–289
  23. Catford JC. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1977;
  24. Ladefoged P. A Course in Phonetics. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College; 1993;
  25. Fourcin A. Laryngographic assessment of phonatory function. ASHA Conference Proceedings, 1981;11:116–127.
  26. Potter J. Vocal Authority. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1998;
  27. Moorcroft L. Embracing alternative methodologies: science and imagery in the teaching and performance of singing. In:  Stevens C,  Burnham D,  McPherson G,  Schubert E,  Renwick J editor. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition. Adelaide: Casual Publications; 2002;p. 561–564
  28. Howard DM, Welch GF, Brereton J, Himonides E, DeCosta M, Williams J, et al. WinSingad: a real-time display for the singing studio. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2004;29:135–144
  29. Welch GF, Sundberg J. Solo voice. In:  Parncutt R,  McPherson GE editor. The Science and Psychology of Music Performance: Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002;p. 253–268
  30. Nair G. Voice—Tradition and Technology. Using the Spectrograph as a Feedback Tool in the Voice Studio. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1999;
  31. Thorpe CW, Callaghan J, van Doorn J. Visual feedback of acoustic voice features for the teaching of singing. Aust Voice. 1999;5:32–39
  32. Welch G. A schema theory of how children learn to sing in tune. Psychol Music. 1985;13:3–18
  33. Boersma P. Accurate short-term analysis of the fundamental frequency and the harmonics-to-noise ratio of a sampled sound. Institute of Phonetic Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Proceedings. 1993;17:97–110
  34. Orlikoff RF. Assessment of the dynamics of vocal fold contact from the electroglottogram: data from normal male subjects. J Speech Hear Res. 1991;34:1066–1072
  35. Smith JO, Serra X. PARSHL: an analysis/synthesis program for non-harmonic sounds based on a sinusoidal representation. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. 290–297. 1987; Champaign-Urbana, USA.
  36. Henrich N, Robeau B, Castellengo M. On the use of electroglottography for characterisation of the laryngeal mechanisms. Bresin, R. Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference (SMAC 03). Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference (SMAC 03), 455–458. 2003.
  37. Henrich N. Mirroring the voice from Garcia to the present day: some insights into singing voice registers. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2006;31:3–14
  38. Baken RJ, Isshiki N. Arytenoid displacement by simulated intrinsic muscle contraction. Folia Phoniatr. 1977;29:206
  39. Hirano M, Vennard W, Ohala J. Regulation of register, pitch and intensity of voice. Folia Phoniatr. 1970;22:1–20
  40. Stark J. The coup de la glotte: a stroke of a genius. Bel Canto—A History of Vocal Pedagogy. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press Incorporated; 1999;3–32

 This study has been presented at the seventh Pan European Voice Conference PEVOC 7, Groningen, the Netherlands, August 29–September 1, 2007. [Lecture, 15 minutes; presented by C. Herbst].

PII: S0892-1997(08)00089-1

doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.06.003

Journal of Voice
Volume 24, Issue 1 , Pages 72-85 , January 2010