Journal of Voice
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 1-7, January 2011

Measurement of Young's Modulus of Vocal Folds by Indentation

This article was a poster presentation at the 130th Annual Meeting of the American Laryngological Association, Phoenix, Arizona, May 28–29, 2009.

  • Dinesh K. Chhetri

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Dinesh K. Chhetri, MD, 62-132 CHS, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, The Laryngeal Dynamics Laboratory, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90095.
  • ,
  • Zhaoyan Zhang
  • ,
  • Juergen Neubauer

Division of Head and Neck Surgery, The Laryngeal Dynamics Laboratory, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

Accepted 22 September 2009. published online 22 February 2010.

Summary 

Objectives

To assess the accuracy of the indentation method for stiffness measurements and to estimate the Young's modulus of the vocal fold using this technique.

Study Design

Basic science.

Methods

Indentation tests were performed using a range of indenter diameters and indentation depths on single- and double-layer silicone rubber models with various cover-layer thicknesses with known geometry and Young's moduli. Measurements were repeated on intact vocal folds and isolated muscle and cover-layer samples from three cadaveric human larynges.

Results

Indentation on single-layer rubber models yielded Young's moduli with acceptable accuracy when the indentation depth was equal to or smaller than the indenter diameter, and both were smaller than the physical dimensions of the material sample. On two-layer models, the stiffness estimation was similarly influenced by indenter diameter and indentation depth, and acceptable accuracy was reached when indentation depth was much smaller than the height of the top cover layer. Measurements on midmembranous vocal fold tissue revealed location-dependent Young's moduli (in kPa) as follows: intact hemilarynx, 8.6 (range=5.3–13.1); isolated inferior medial surface cover, 7.5 (range=7–7.9); isolated medial surface cover, 4.8 (range=3.9–5.7); isolated superior surface cover, 2.9 (range=2.7–3.2); and isolated thyroarytenoid muscle, 2.0 (range=1.3–2.7).

Conclusions

Indenter diameter, indentation depth, and material thickness are important parameters in the measurement of vocal fold stiffness using the indentation technique. Measurements on human larynges showed location-dependent differences in stiffness. The stiffness of the vocal folds was also found to be higher when the vocal fold structure was still attached to the laryngeal framework compared with that when the vocal fold was separated from the framework.

Key Words: Voice, Larynx, Viscoelasticity, Young's Modulus

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was funded by a grant from the American Laryngological Voice and Research Education Foundation (D.K.C.) and by grants R01DC003072 and R01DC009229 from the National Institutes of Health.

 Other financial disclosures: None.

PII: S0892-1997(09)00152-0

doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.005

Journal of Voice
Volume 25, Issue 1 , Pages 1-7, January 2011