Journal of Voice
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 245-248, March 2011

Effects of Neck Dissection and Radiotherapy on Short-Term Speech Success in Voice Prosthesis Restoration Patients

  • Erdogan Gultekin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Namik Kemal University Medicine Faculty, Tekirdag, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Erdogan Gultekin, Department of Otolaryngology, Namik Kemal University Medicine Faculty, 59100 Tekirdag, Turkey.
  • ,
  • Kursat Yelken

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Gaziomanpasa University Medicine Faculty, Tokat, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mehmet Fatih Garca

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Van Education and Research Hospital, Van, Turkey
  • ,
  • Omer N. Develioglu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mehmet Kulekci

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology, Taksim Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Accepted 23 October 2009. published online 02 March 2010.

Summary 

Objective

To compare the short-term speech success of voice prosthesis (VP) among patients who underwent total laryngectomy or total laryngectomy in combination with neck dissection and those who received postoperative radiotherapy.

Materials and Methods

Thirty-two male patients treated for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were included. Nine patients underwent total laryngectomy and 23 underwent total laryngectomy combined with neck dissection, and 17 of the 23 with neck dissection were managed with postoperative radiotherapy (45–75Gy). All of the patients had indwelling intraoperative placement of the Provox VP (Atos Medical AB, Horby, Sweden; and Entermed BV, Woerden, The Netherlands) at the time of the primary tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) completed in conjunction with total laryngectomy. Patients with pharyngoesophageal myotomy and pharyngeal plexus neurectomy were excluded. Patients' speech success was perceptually evaluated 3–4 weeks after the surgery and 3–4 weeks after the cessation of radiotherapy, using a 1–3 scale (1=failure to develop speech (aphonia); 2=communicate with short phrases only; and 3=communicate with fluency and long sentences).

Results

No complications were noted with intraoperative prosthesis placement. No prostheses were dislodged in the postoperative period. Eighteen of 32 patients (56%) demonstrated successful speech (rating of 3). Nine patients (28%) demonstrated less successful speech (rating of 2). Five patients (16%) were found to be aphonic (P>0.05). Of the nine patients who underwent total laryngectomy only, six were found to have successful speech (66.6%), one (11.1%) was found to have less successful speech quality, and two (22.2%) patients were aphonic (P>0.05). Of the six patients who underwent total laryngectomy in combination with neck dissection, three had successful speech (50%), one (16.6%) had less successful speech, and two (33.3%) were aphonic (P>0.05). Of the 17 patients who received postoperative radiotherapy, nine (52.9%) had successful speech, three (17.6%) had less successful speech, and five (29.4%) were aphonic (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Neck dissection and postoperative radiotherapy have no significant influence on short-term speech success in VP restoration patients. Primary TEP should be preferred in patients who have laryngectomy in combination with neck dissection and/or will have postoperative radiation therapy, as it provides early and successful voice restoration without interfering with radiation treatment and avoids a second surgical intervention.

Key Words: Laryngectomy, Neck dissection, Radiotherapy, Voice prosthesis, Perceptual voice evaluation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0892-1997(09)00190-8

doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.10.011

Journal of Voice
Volume 25, Issue 2 , Pages 245-248, March 2011