Journal of Voice
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 275-282, May 2011

A Novel Model for Examining Recovery of Phonation After Vocal Nerve Damage

Presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery Annual Conference; September 21–24, 2008; Chicago, IL.

  • Prabhat K. Bhama

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Prabhat K. Bhama, Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 356515, BB1165, Seattle, WA 98195-6515.
  • ,
  • Allen D. Hillel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • Albert L. Merati

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
  • ,
  • David J. Perkel

      Affiliations

    • Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
    • Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Accepted 10 November 2009. published online 02 March 2010.

Summary 

Objectives/Hypothesis

Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury remains a dominant clinical issue in laryngology. To date, no animal model of laryngeal reinnervation has offered an outcome measure that can reflect the degree of recovery based on vocal function. We present an avian model system for studying recovery of learned vocalizations after nerve injury.

Study Design

Prospective animal study.

Methods

Digital recordings of bird song were made from 11 adult male zebra finches; nine birds underwent bilateral crushing of the nerve supplying the vocal organ, and two birds underwent sham surgery. Songs from all the birds were then recorded regularly and analyzed based on temporal and spectral characteristics using computer software. Indices were calculated to indicate the degree of similarity between preoperative and postoperative song.

Results

Nerve crush caused audible differences in song quality and significant drops (P<0.05) in measured spectral and, to a lesser degree, temporal indices. Spectral indices recovered significantly (mean=43.0%; standard deviation [SD]=40.7; P<0.02), and there was an insignificant trend toward recovery of temporal index (mean=28.0%; SD=41.4; P=0.0771). In five of the nine (56%) birds, there was a greater than 50% recovery of spectral indices within a 4-week period. Two birds exhibited substantially less recovery of spectral indices and two birds had a persistent decline in spectral indices. Recovery of temporal index was highly variable as well, ranging from persistent further declines of 45.1% to recovery of 87%. Neither sham bird exhibited significant (P>0.05) differences in song after nerve crush.

Conclusion

The songbird model system allows functional analysis of learned vocalization after surgical damage to vocal nerves.

Key Words: Larynx, Laryngology, Vocal production, Recurrent laryngeal nerve, Laryngeal reinnervation

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0892-1997(09)00210-0

doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.11.005

Journal of Voice
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 275-282, May 2011