« BackJournal of Voice
Article in Press

Creating a Mastery Experience During the Voice Evaluation

  • Heather Shaw Bonilha

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence and reprint requests to Heather Shaw Bonilha, Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, 77 President Street, Charleston, SC 29425.
  • ,
  • Amy Elizabeth Dawson

Department of Health Science and Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

Accepted 15 September 2011. published online 13 January 2012.
Corrected Proof

Summary 

Objectives

Adherence to treatment is a common challenge when working with patients with voice disorders. Improving their self-efficacy through a mastery experience has the potential to improve treatment adherence. An ideal mastery experience gives early and quick evidence that the patient will be successful with the treatment and works for a broad range of patients. This study sought to test whether a brief stimulability trial of forward focused voice could produce sufficient change in acoustic analysis measures to provide visibly improved objective results and, thus, be a potentially useful mastery experience.

Study Design

Prospective, repeated measures, pre- and posttreatment.

Methods

Twenty-four consecutive patients with varying diagnoses referred for a voice evaluation participated in this study. Acoustic analysis was completed before and after a short stimulability trial of forward focused voice. Acoustic analysis parameters evaluated include fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, noise-to-harmonic ratio, and voice turbulence index. Data pre- and posttreatment were analyzed for change and compared with normative values.

Results

Results demonstrated a significant change from pre- to posttrial, as indicated by the objective measure transitioning from being outside to within normal limits, in 75% of patients (P=0.000). When less rigid criterion of a positive change in one or more of the three acoustic measures of interest is used, improvement was noted in 96% of patients.

Conclusion

Pairing a trial therapy with acoustic analysis during a voice evaluation is a possible mastery experience. Future research is needed to determine if this mastery experience improves self-efficacy, treatment adherence, and treatment outcomes.

Key Words: Voice, Evaluation, Mastery experience, Self-efficacy, Acoustic analysis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Portions of this study were presented at the 39th Symposium of The Voice Foundation: Care of the Professional Voice; June 2010; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and the Pan European Voice Conference; September 2011; Marseille, France.

PII: S0892-1997(11)00160-3

doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.09.004

« BackJournal of Voice