Habitual Use of Vocal Fry in Young Adult Female Speakers

Published:September 15, 2011DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.007

      Summary

      The purpose of this study was to examine the use of vocal fry in young adult Standard American-English (SAE) speakers. This was a preliminary attempt (1) to determine the prevalence of the use of this register in young adult college-aged American speakers and (2) to describe the acoustic characteristics of vocal fry in these speakers. Subjects were 34 female college students. They were native SAE speakers aged 18–25 years. Data collection procedures included high quality recordings of two speaking conditions, (1) sustained isolated vowel /a/ and (2) sentence reading task. Data analyses included both perceptual and acoustic evaluations. Results showed that approximately two-thirds of this population used vocal fry and that it was most likely to occur at the end of sentences. In addition, statistically significant differences between vocal fry and normal register were found for mean F0 minimum, F0 maximum, F0 range, and jitter local. Preliminary findings were taken to suggest that use of the vocal fry register may be common in some adult SAE speakers.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hollien H.
        On vocal register.
        J Phon. 1974; 2: 125-144
      1. Ewender T, Hoffmann S, Pfister B. Nearly perfect detection of continuous F0 contour and frame classification for TTS synthesis. In: Proceedings of Interspeech; 2009:100–103.

        • Redi L.
        • Shattuck-Hufnagel S.
        Variations in the realization of glottalization in normal speakers.
        J Phon. 2001; 29: 407-429
      2. Bohm T, Shattuck-Hufnagel S. Utterance final glottalization as cue for familiar speaking recognition. In: INTERSPEECH-2007; 2007:2657–2660.

        • Slifka J.
        Some physiological correlates to regular and irregular phonation at the end of an utterance.
        J Voice. 2006; 20: 171-186
        • Moore P.
        • Von Leden H.
        Dynamic variations in the vibratory pattern in the normal larynx.
        Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1958; 10: 205-238
        • Wolfe V.
        • Cornell R.
        • Palmer C.
        Acoustic correlates of pathologic voice types.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34: 509-516
        • Eskenazi L.
        • Childers D.G.
        • Hicks D.M.
        Acoustic correlates of vocal quality.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1990; 33: 298-306
        • Ylitalo Y.
        • Hammarberg B.
        Voice characteristics, effects of voice therapy, and long-term follow-up of contact granuloma patients.
        J Voice. 1997; 14: 557-566
        • Hollien H.
        • Moore P.
        • Wendahl R.W.
        • Michel J.F.
        On the nature of vocal fry.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1966; 9: 245-247
        • Daniloff R.
        • Schuckers G.
        • Feth L.
        The Physiology of Speech and Hearing: An Introduction.
        Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1980
        • Childers D.G.
        • Lee C.K.
        Vocal quality factors: analysis, synthesis, and perception.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1991; 90: 2394-2410
        • Gottliebson R.O.
        • Lee L.
        • Weinrich B.
        • Sanders J.
        Voice problems of future speech-language pathologists.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 699-704
        • Hollien H.
        • Michel J.F.
        Vocal fry as a phonational register.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1968; 11: 600-604
        • Chen Y.
        • Robb M.P.
        • Gilbert H.R.
        Electroglottographic evaluation of gender and vowel effects during modal and vocal fry phonation.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002; 45: 821-829
        • Hollien H.
        • Wendahl R.W.
        Perceptual study of vocal fry.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1968; 43: 506-509
        • Timcke R.
        • von Leden H.
        • Moore P.
        Laryngeal vibrations: measurements of the glottic wave.
        AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1958; 68: 1-19
        • McGlone R.E.
        • Shipp T.
        Some physiologic correlates of vocal-fry phonation.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1971; 14: 769-775
        • Hollien H.
        • Girard G.T.
        • Coleman R.F.
        Vocal fold vibratory patterns of pulse register phonation.
        Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1977; 9: 200-205
        • Whitehead R.L.
        • Mets D.E.
        • Whitehead B.H.
        Vibratory patterns of the vocal folds during pulse register phonation.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1984; 75: 1293-1297
        • Chen Y.
        • Ng M.
        • Jeng J.
        • Gilbert H.
        Aerodynamic, electroglottographic, and acoustic characteristics of modal and vocal fry registers.
        ASHA. 1996; 38: 62
        • Blomgren M.
        • Chen Y.
        • Ng M.
        • Gilbert H.
        Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual characteristics of modal and vocal fry registers.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103: 2649-2658
        • Murry T.
        Subglottal pressure and airflow measures during vocal fry phonation.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1971; 14: 544-551
      3. Belotel-Grenié A, Grenié M. The creaky voice phonation and the organization of Chinese discourse, [on-line]. In: International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: Emphasis on Tone Languages; 2004:28–30.

      4. Lehiste I. Sentence boundaries and paragraph boundaries—perceptual evidence. In: The Elements: A Para-Session on Linguistic Units and Levels. Chicago Linguistics Society; 1979:99–109.

        • Kreiman J.
        Perception of sentence and paragraph boundaries in natural conversation.
        J Phon. 1982; 10: 163-175
        • Allen J.
        The glottal stop as a junctural correlate in English.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1970; 40: 57-58
        • Umeda N.
        Occurrence of glottal stops in fluent speech.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 64: 88-94
        • Dilley L.
        • Shattuck Hufnagel S.
        • Ostendorf M.
        Glottalization of word-initial vowels as function of prosodic structure.
        J Phon. 1996; 24: 423-444
        • Laver J.
        The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality.
        Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK1980
      5. Lehiste I. Juncture. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences; 1965:172–200.

        • Lehiste I.
        Suprasegmentals.
        MIT Press, Cambridge, UK1970
        • Ogden R.
        Turn-holding, turn-yielding, and laryngeal activity in Finnish talk-in-interaction.
        J Int Phon Ass. 2001; 31: 139-152
      6. Surana K, Slifka J. Is irregular phonation a reliable cue towards the segmentation of continuous speech in American English? In: ICSA International Conference on Speech Prosody. Dresden, Germany; 2006.

      7. Hedelin P, Huber D. Pitch period determination of aperiodic speech signals. In: Proceedings of ICASSP. Albuquerque, New Mexico; 1990:361–364

      8. Boersma P, Weenink D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.1.05) [Computer program]. Available at: http://www.praat.org/1. Last accessed May 1, 2009.

        • Colton R.H.
        • Casper J.K.
        • Leonard R.
        Understanding Voice Problems: A Physiological Perceptive for Diagnosis and Treatment.
        Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD2011