Advertisement

Pitch Discrimination and Pitch Matching Abilities with Vocal and Nonvocal Stimuli

      Summary

      Various stimulus types have been investigated in pitch discrimination and pitch matching tasks. However, previous studies have not explored the use of recorded samples of an individual's own voice in performing these two tasks. The purpose of this study was to investigate pitch discrimination and pitch matching abilities using three stimuli conditions (participant's own voice, a neutral female voice, and nonvocal complex tones) to determine if pitch discrimination and/or pitch matching abilities are influenced by the type of stimuli presented. Results of the pitch discrimination tasks yielded no significant difference in discrimination ability for the three stimuli. For the pitch matching tasks, a significant difference was found for the participants' voice versus neutral female voice and the participants' voice versus tonal stimuli. There was no significant difference in pitch matching ability between the neutral female voice and the tonal stimuli. There was no significant correlation between pitch discrimination and pitch matching abilities for any of the three stimuli types. These results suggest that it is easier to match the pitch of one's own voice than to match the pitch of a neutral female voice and nonvocal complex tones, although no difference was found for pitch discrimination abilities. One possible implication of this study is that differences in matching the pitch of one's own voice compared to matching other stimuli types may help to differentiate the source of singing inaccuracy (motor vs discrimination skills).

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brashears S.
        • Morlet T.
        • Berlin C.
        • Hood L.
        Olivocochlear efferent suppression in classical musicians.
        J Am Acad Audiol. 2003; 14: 314-324
        • Gaab N.
        • Gaser C.
        • Zaehle T.
        • Jancke L.
        • Schlaug G.
        Functional anatomy of pitch memory—an fMRI study with sparse temporal sampling.
        Neuroimage. 2003; 19: 1417-1426
      1. Deutsch D. The deterioration of pitch information in memory [unpublished doctoral dissertation]. San Diego, CA: University of California at San Diego; 1970.

        • Fairbanks G.
        Selective vocal effects on delayed auditory feedback.
        J Speech Hear Disord. 1955; 20: 333-346
        • Siegle G.
        • Pick H.
        Auditory feedback in the regulation of voice.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1974; 56: 1618-1624
        • Siegle G.
        • Kennard K.
        Lombard and sidetone amplification effects in normal and misarticulating children.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1984; 27: 56-62
        • Fairbanks G.
        Systematic research in experimental phonetics. I. A theory of the speech mechanism as a servosystem.
        J Speech Hear Disord. 1954; 19: 133-140
        • Howell P.
        • El-Yaniv N.
        • Powell D.
        Factors affecting fluency in stutters.
        in: Peters H.F.M. Hulstijin W. Speech Motor Dynamics in Stuttering. Springer-Verlag, New York1987: 361-369
        • Elman J.
        Effects of frequency-shifted feedback on the pitch of vocal productions.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1981; 70: 45-50
        • Brody V.A.
        The emergence of song.
        Music Educ J. 1949; 36: 22-24
        • Amir O.
        • Amir N.
        • Kishon-Rabin L.
        The effect of superior auditory skills on vocal accuracy.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 113: 1102-1108
        • Pitt M.
        Perception of pitch and timbre by musically trained and untrained listeners.
        J Exp Psychol. 1994; 20: 976-986
        • Watts C.
        • Moore R.
        • McCaghren K.
        The relationship between vocal pitch-matching skills and pitch discrimination skills in untrained accurate and inaccurate singers.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 534-543
        • Watts C.
        • Murphy J.
        • Barnes-Burroughs K.
        Pitch-matching accuracy of trained singers, untrained participants with talented singing voices, and untrained participants with non-talented singing voices in conditions of varying feedback.
        J Voice. 2003; 17: 187-196
        • Bradshaw E.
        • McHenry M.
        Pitch discrimination and pitch matching abilities of adults who sing inaccurately.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 431-439
        • Moore B.
        • Glasberg B.
        • Proctor G.
        Accuracy of pitch matching for pure tones and for complex tones with overlapping and non-overlapping harmonics.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91: 3443-3450
        • Singh P.
        • Hirsh I.
        Influence of spectral locus and F0 changes on the pitch and timbre of complex tones.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 92: 2650-2662
        • Jarvelainen H.
        • Verma T.
        • Valimaki V.
        Perception and adjustment of pitch in inharmonic string instrument tones.
        J New Music Res. 2002; 31: 311-319
        • Schueller M.
        • Fucci D.
        • Bond Z.
        Perceptual judgment of voice pitch during pitch matching tasks.
        Percept Mot Skills. 2002; 94: 967-974
        • Boone D.
        • McFarlane S.
        • Von Berg S.
        The Voice and Voice Therapy.
        Allyn & Bacon, Boston2005 (201–206)
        • Stemple J.
        Clinical Voice Pathology: Theory and Management.
        Singular, San Diego2000 (304–310)
        • Mathieson L.
        The Voice and Its Disorders.
        Whurr, London2001 (512–554)
        • He N.
        • Dubno J.
        • Mills J.
        Frequency and intensity discrimination measured in a maximum likelihood procedure from young and aged normal-hearing subjects.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103: 553-565
        • American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
        Guidelines for manual pure-tone audiometry.
        ASHA. 1978; 20: 297-301
        • American National Standards Institute
        Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms.
        (ANSI S3.1-1991) American National Standards Institute, New York1991
        • American National Standards Institute
        Specifications for audiometers.
        (ANSI S3.6-1996) American National Standards Institute, New York1996