A Comparison of Recordings of Sentences and Spontaneous Speech: Perceptual and Acoustic Measures in Preschool Children’s Voices

  • Anita McAllister
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Anita McAllister, Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping SE-581 83, Sweden.
    Affiliations
    Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
    Search for articles by this author
  • Signe Kofoed Brandt
    Affiliations
    Habilitation Services, Kullbergska Hospital, 641 22 Katrineholm, Sweden
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      A well-controlled recording in a studio is fundamental in most voice rehabilitation. However, this laboratory like recording method has been questioned because voice use in a natural environment may be quite different. In children’s natural environment, high background noise levels are common and are an important factor contributing to voice problems. The primary noise source in day-care centers is the children themselves. The aim of the present study was to compare perceptual evaluations of voice quality and acoustic measures from a controlled recording with recordings of spontaneous speech in children’s natural environment in a day-care setting. Eleven 5-year-old children were recorded three times during a day at the day care. The controlled speech material consisted of repeated sentences. Matching sentences were selected from the spontaneous speech. All sentences were repeated three times. Recordings were randomized and analyzed acoustically and perceptually. Statistic analyses showed that fundamental frequency was significantly higher in spontaneous speech (P<0.01) as was hyperfunction (P<0.001). The only characteristic the controlled sentences shared with spontaneous speech was degree of hoarseness (Spearman’s rho=0.564). When data for boys and girls were analyzed separately, a correlation was found for the parameter breathiness (rho=0.551) for boys, and for girls the correlation for hoarseness remained (rho=0.752). Regarding acoustic data, none of the measures correlated across recording conditions for the whole group.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • DeBodt M.S.
        • Wuyts F.L.
        • Van de Heyning P.H.
        • Croux C.
        Test-retest study of the GRBAS scale: influence of experience and professional background on perceptual rating of voice quality.
        J Voice. 1997; 11: 74-80
        • Isshiki N.
        • Okamura H.
        • Tanabe M.
        • Morimoto M.
        Differential diagnosis of hoarseness.
        Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1969; 21: 9-19
        • Hammarberg B.
        Perceptual and acoustic analysis of dysphonia.
        ([PhD-thesis]) Karolinska Institute, Department of logopedics and phoniatrics, Stockholm, Sweden1986
        • Hammarberg B.
        Voice research and clinical needs.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2000; 52: 93-192
        • Benninger M.S.
        • Ahuja A.S.
        • Gardner G.
        • Grywalski C.
        Assessing outcomes for dysphonic patients.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 540-550
        • Nienkerke-Springer A.
        • McAllister A.
        • Sundberg J.
        Effects of family therapy on children’s voices.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 103-113
        • Zur K.B.
        • Cotton S.
        • Kelchner L.
        • Baker S.
        • Weinrich B.
        • Lee L.
        Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 71: 77-82
        • Zerffi W.A.C.
        Functional vocal disabilities.
        Laryngoscope. 1939; 49: 1143-1147
        • Powell M.
        • Filter M.D.
        • Williams B.
        A longitudinal study of the prevalence of voice disorders in children from a rural school division.
        J Commun Disord. 1989; 22: 375-382
        • Szabo A.
        • Hammarberg B.
        • Håkansson A.
        • Södersten M.
        A voice accumulator device: evaluation based on studio and field recordings.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2001; 26: 102-117
        • Szabo A.
        • Hammarberg B.
        • Granqvist S.
        • Södersten M.
        Methods to study pre-school teachers’ voice at work: simultaneous recordings with a voice accumulator and a DAT recorder.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003; 28: 29-39
        • Ternström S.
        • Södersten M.
        • Boman M.
        Cancellation of simulated environmental noise as a tool for measuring vocal performance during noise exposure.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 195-206
        • Vilkman E.
        Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004; 6: 220-253
        • Södersten M.
        • Granqvist S.
        • Hammarberg B.
        • Szabo A.
        Vocal behaviour and vocal loading factors for pre-school teacher at work studied with binaural DAT recordings.
        J Voice. 2002; 3: 356-371
        • Lindstrom F.
        • Ohlsson A.C.
        • Sjöholm J.
        • Waye K.P.
        Mean F0 values obtained through standard phrase pronunciation compared with values obtained from the normal work environment: a study on teacher and child voices performed in a preschool environment.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 319-323
        • Hunter E.J.
        A comparison of a child’s fundamental frequencies in structured elicited vocalizations versus unstructured natural vocalizations: a case study.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 73: 561-571
        • Chen Y.
        • Kimelman M.D.Z.
        • Micco K.
        Investigation of habitual pitch during freeplay activities for preschool-aged children.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 73: 73-80
        • McAllister A.
        • Granqvist S.
        • Sjölander P.
        • Sundberg J.
        Child voice and noise: a pilot study of the effect of a day at the day-care on ten children’s voice quality according to perceptual evaluation.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 587-593
        • Granqvist S.
        The self-to-other ratio applied as a phonation detector for voice accumulation.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003; 28: 71-80
      1. Soundswell Signal Workstation™, 4.5.
        Saven Hitech, Sweden2007
        • Sederholm E.
        • McAllister A.
        • Sundberg J.
        • Dalkvist J.
        Perceptual evaluation of hoarseness using continuous scales.
        Scand J Logop Phoniatr. 1993; 18: 73-82
        • McAllister A.
        • Sederholm E.
        • Sundberg J.
        • Gramming P.
        Relations between voice range profiles and physiological and perceptual voice characteristics in ten-year-old children.
        J Voice. 1994; 3: 230-239
        • Biever D.
        • Bless D.
        Vibratory characteristics of the vocal folds in young adult and geriatric women.
        J Voice. 1989; 3: 120-131
        • Södersten M.
        • Lindestad P.
        Glottal closure and perceived breathiness during phonation in normally speaking subjects.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1990; 33: 601-611
        • Gramming P.
        • Sundberg J.
        • Ternström S.
        • Leandersson R.
        • Perkins W.
        Relationship between changes in voice pitch and intensity.
        J Voice. 1998; 2: 118-126
        • Södersten M.
        • Ternström S.
        • Bohman M.
        Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 29-46
        • Ohlsson A.C.
        • Brink O.
        • Löfqvist A.
        A voice accumulation—validation and application.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1989; 32: 451-457
        • Cheyne H.A.
        • Hanson H.M.
        • Genereux R.P.
        • Stevens K.N.
        • Hillman R.E.
        Development and testing of a portable vocal accumulator.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46: 1457-1467
        • Lindström F.
        • Persson Waye K.
        • Södersten M.
        • McAllister A.
        • Ternström S.
        Background noise in a pre-schools and average sound pressure level and fundamental frequency of teachers’ voices.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 166-172