Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 26, ISSUE 6, P814.e15-814.e19, November 2012

Download started.

Ok

Development of the Arabic Version of Reflux Symptom Index

  • Mohamed Farahat
    Affiliations
    Department of ENT, Communication and Swallowing Disorders Unit, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Khalid H. Malki
    Affiliations
    Department of ENT, Communication and Swallowing Disorders Unit, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Tamer A. Mesallam
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Tamer A. Mesallam, Department of ENT, Communication and Swallowing Disorders Unit, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, P.O. Box 245, Riyadh 11411, Saudi Arabia.
    Affiliations
    Department of ENT, Communication and Swallowing Disorders Unit, College of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Department of Otolaryngology, College of Medicine, Al-Menoufiya University, Shebin Al-Koum, Egypt
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      Background and Objective

      Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), is a nine-item self-administered questionnaire. It is a noninvasive tool with the purpose of assessing the symptoms of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The purposes of the present study were to develop an Arabic version of the RSI and to evaluate its validity, consistency, and reliability in normal Arabic population with suspected LPR.

      Setting and Design

      This is a prospective study that has been carried out at Communication and Swallowing Disorders Unit, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

      Subjects and Methods

      The generated Arabic RSI was administered to 52 patients with suspected LPR and to 100 control subjects. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated. The results of the patients and the control groups were compared.

      Results

      The Arabic RSI showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α=.72). Also, good test-retest reliability was found for the total scores of the Arabic RSI (r=0.9799, P=0.001). There was a significant difference between RSI scores of the control and the LPR group (P<0.001).

      Conclusion

      This study demonstrated that Arabic RSI is a valid tool for self-assessment of LPR that can be used by Arabic language speakers.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Koufman J.A.
        The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambu- latory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.
        Laryngoscope. 1991; 101: 1-78
        • Chodosh P.
        Gastroesophageal-pharyngeal reflux.
        Laryngoscope. 1997; 87: 1418-1427
        • Bough Jr., I.D.
        • Sataloff R.T.
        • Catell D.O.
        • Hills J.R.
        • Gideon R.M.
        • Spiegel J.R.
        Gastroesophageal reflux laryngitis resistant to omeprazole therapy.
        J Voice. 1995; 9: 205-211
        • Wiener G.J.
        • Koufman J.A.
        • Wu W.C.
        • Cooper J.B.
        • Richter J.E.
        • Castell D.O.
        Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 1989; 84: 1503-1508
        • Befalsky P.C.
        • Postma G.N.
        • Koufman J.A.
        The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS).
        Laryngoscope. 2001; 111: 1313-1317
        • Belafsky P.C.
        • Postma G.N.
        • Koufamn J.A.
        Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 274-277
        • Wise S.K.
        • Wise J.C.
        • DelGaudio J.M.
        Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngopharyngeal reflux in patients with sleep-disordered breathing.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 135: 253-257
        • Kelchner L.N.
        • Horne J.
        • Lee L.
        • et al.
        Reliability of speech-language pathologist and otolaryngologist ratings of laryngeal signs of reflux in an asymptomatic population using the reflux finding score.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 92-100
        • Gupta R.
        • Sataloff R.T.
        Laryngopharyngeal reflux: current concepts and questions.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 17: 143-148
        • Ford C.N.
        Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux.
        JAMA. 2005; 294: 1534-1540
        • Schindler A.
        • Mozzanica F.
        • Ginocchio D.
        • et al.
        Reliability and clinical validity of the Italian reflux symptom index.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 354-358
        • Farahat M.
        Validity and reliability of voice handicap index-10.
        Saudi J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 14 (In press)