Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 27, ISSUE 5, P567-571, September 2013

Formant Frequency in Relation to Body Mass Composition

      Summary

      Objectives

      This study examines the relationship between total body mass composition and vowel formant frequency and formant dispersion in men.

      Methods

      A total of 60 healthy male volunteers were recruited. Formant frequencies and dispersions of F1, F2, F3, and F4 for the vowels /ɑː/ and /iː/ were determined using spectrographic analysis.

      Results

      The mean height and weight were 179.17 cm and 80.53 kg, respectively, with fat-free weight averaging to 67.02 kg (65.5% in the extremities vs 16.7% in the trunk). The body mass index (BMI) was 25.5±3.34 kg/m2. For the vowel /ɑː/, F1 and F4 correlated poorly with weight and trunk fat-free mass. There was also a poor negative correlation between F4 and muscle mass and body fat-free mass (r<0.36). For the /iː/ vowel, there was a weak negative correlation between F2, F3, and F4 and height (r=−0.260, −0.299, and −0.320, respectively). Similarly, there was a negative correlation between F2 and muscle mass, trunk fat-free mass, and body fat-free mass (r=−0.291, −0.276, and −0.272, respectively). For the vowel /ɑː/, F1-F2 interspace correlated positively with fat weight, fat mass in the extremities, and trunk (r=0.313, 0.350, and 0.264, respectively), whereas F2-F3 negatively correlated with weight (r=−0.255). For the /iː/ vowel, only F1-F2 negatively correlated with weight and BMI (r=−0.297 and −0.281).

      Conclusion

      There is no significant correlation between body mass composition, formant frequencies, and dispersions. All the correlations were poor with r values less than 0.36.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Solomon N.P.
        • Helou L.B.
        • Dietrich-Burns K.
        • Stojadinovic A.
        Do obesity and weight loss affect vocal function?.
        Semin Speech Lang. 2011; 32: 31-42
        • Kunzel H.J.
        How well does average fundamental frequency correlate with speaker height and weight?.
        Phonetica. 1989; 46: 117-125
        • Lass N.J.
        • Brown W.S.
        Correlational study of speakers height, weights, body surface areas, and speaking fundamental frequencies.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 63: 1218-1220
        • Evans S.
        • Neave N.
        • Wakelin D.
        Relationships between vocal characteristics and body size and shape in human males: an evolutionary explanation for a deep male voice.
        Biol Psychol. 2006; 72: 160-163
        • Da Cunha M.G.
        • Passerotti G.H.
        • Weber R.
        • Zilberstein B.
        • Cecconello I.
        Voice feature characteristics in morbid obese population.
        Obes Surg. 2011; 21: 340-344
        • Fitch W.T.
        Vocal tract length and formant frequency dispersion correlate with body size in rhesus macaques.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102: 1213-1222
        • Fitch W.T.
        • Giedd J.
        Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 106: 1511-1522
        • Bruckert L.
        • Liénard J.-S.
        • Lacroix A.
        • Kreutzer M.
        • Leboucher G.
        Women use voice parameters to assess men's characteristics.
        Proc Biol Sci. 2006; 273: 83-98
        • Van Dommelen W.A.
        • Moxness B.H.
        Acoustic parameters in speaker height and weight identification: sex-specific behaviour.
        Lang Speech. 1995; 38: 267-287
        • Gonzalez J.
        Formant frequencies and body size of speaker: a weak relationship in adult humans.
        J Phon. 2004; 32: 277-287
        • Tanita B.C.
        418 MA Instruction Manual and Technical Notes.
        Tanita, Corp., Tokyo, Japan2002
        • Gaur A.S.
        • Gaur S.S.
        Statistical Methods for Practice and Research; A Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS 2nd ed.
        Sage Publications, New Delhi, India2009
        • Sundberg J.
        Vocal tract resonance.
        in: Sataloff R.T. Vocal Health and Pedagogy. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego, CA1998: 47-64 ([Chapter 4])
        • Mueller P.B.
        • Sweeney R.J.
        • Baribeau L.J.
        Senescence of the voice: morphology of excised male larynges.
        Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1985; 37: 134-138
        • Fitch W.T.
        • Hauser M.D.
        Vocal production in nonhuman primates: acoustics, physiology and functional constrains on honest advertising.
        Am J Primatol. 1995; 37: 191-219
        • Baken R.J.
        An overview of laryngeal function for voice production.
        in: Staloff R.T. Vocal Health and Pedagogy. Singular Publishing Group Inc, San Diego, CA1998: 27-46 ([Chapter 3])