“Ring” in the Solo Child Singing Voice

Published:November 11, 2013DOI:



      Listeners often describe the voices of solo child singers as being “pure” or “clear”; these terms would suggest that the voice is not only pleasant but also clearly audible. The audibility or clarity could be attributed to the presence of high-frequency partials in the sound: a “brightness” or “ring.” This article aims to investigate spectrally the acoustic nature of this ring phenomenon in children's solo voices, and in particular, relating it to their “nonring” production. Additionally, this is set in the context of establishing to what extent, if any, the spectral characteristics of ring are shared with those of the singer's formant cluster associated with professional adult opera singers in the 2.5–3.5 kHz region.


      A group of child solo singers, acknowledged as outstanding by a singing teacher who specializes in teaching professional child singers, were recorded in a major UK concert hall performing Come unto him, all ye that labour, from the aria He shall feed his flock from The Messiah by GF Handel. Their singing was accompanied by a recording of a piano played through in-ear headphones. Sound pressure recordings were made from well within the critical distance in the hall. The singers were observed to produce notes with and without ring, and these recordings were analyzed in the frequency domain to investigate their spectra.


      The results indicate that there is evidence to suggest that ring in child solo singers is carried in two areas of the output spectrum: first in the singer's formant cluster region, centered around 4 kHz, which is more than 1000 Hz higher than what is observed in adults; and second in the region around 7.5–11 kHz where a significant strengthening of harmonic presence is observed. A perceptual test has been carried out demonstrating that 94% of 62 listeners label a synthesized version of the calculated overall average ring spectrum for all subjects as having ring when compared with a synthesized version of the calculated overall average nonring spectrum.


      The notion of ring in the child solo voice manifests itself not only with spectral features in common with the projection peak found in adult singers but also in a higher frequency region. It is suggested that the formant cluster at around 4 kHz is the children's equivalent of the singers' formant cluster; the frequency is higher than in the adult, most likely due to the smaller dimensions of the epilaryngeal tube. The frequency cluster observed as a strong peak at about 7.5–11 kHz, when added to the children's singers' formant cluster, may be the key to cueing the notion of ring in the child solo voice.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Gauntlett H.J.
        • Alexander C.F.
        Once in Royal David's city.
        in: Jacques R. Willcocks D. Carols for Choirs 1. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK1961: 100
        • Laurence F.
        Children's singing.
        in: Potter J. The Cambridge Companion to Singing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2001: 221-230
        • Phillips P.
        The golden age regained.
        Early Music. 1980; 8: 4
        • Laurence F.
        Children's singing.
        in: Chapman J. Singing and Teaching Singing. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2013: 221-230
        • Day T.
        English cathedral choirs in the twentieth century.
        in: Potter J. The Cambridge Companion to Singing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK2001: 123-132
        • Nair G.
        Voice-Tradition and Technology: A State-of-the-Art Studio.
        Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA1999
        • Brown O.
        • Fraterrigo N.
        • Gates L.
        • Potter C.
        • Reed W.
        • Reynolds E.
        • Teaney D.
        The laryngograph in singing. II. The “ring” in the professional voice.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1980; 67: S98-S99
        • Howard D.M.
        • Murphy D.T.
        Voice Science, Acoustics and Recording.
        Plural press, San Diego, CA2008
        • Titze I.R.
        Fascinations with the Human Voice.
        National Center for Voice and Speech, Denver, CO2010
        • Hollien H.
        The puzzle of the singer's formant.
        in: Bless D.M. Abbs J.H. Vocal Fold Physiology. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA1983: 368-380
        • Bartholomew W.T.
        A physical definition of good voice quality in the male voice.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1934; 9: 25-33
        • Sundberg J.
        Articulatory interpretation of the “singing formant”.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1974; 55: 838-844
        • Sundberg J.
        The Science of Singing.
        Northern Illinois University Press, Dekalb, IL1987
      1. Sundberg J. Perception of singing. In: Deutsch D, ed. The Psychology of Music. 3rd Ed. New York, NY: Academic Press; 2012.

        • Smith B.
        • Sataloff R.T.
        Choral Pedagogy.
        3rd ed. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2006
        • Chapman J.
        Singing and Teaching Singing.
        Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2013
        • Davis P.J.
        • Zhang S.P.
        • Bandler R.
        Midbrain and medullary regulation of vocalization.
        in: Fletcher N. Davis P. Controlling Complexity and Chaos. Singular Publishing Corporation, San Diego, CA1996: 121-136
        • Lieberman P.
        • Harris M.
        • Wolff P.
        • Russell L.
        Newborn infant cry and nonhuman primate vocalizations.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1971; 14: 41-53
        • Lieberman P.
        Uniquely Human: The Evolution of Speech, Thought, and Selfless Behavior.
        Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA1991
        • Scheiner E.
        • Hammerschmidt K.
        • Jurgens U.
        • Zwirner P.
        Acoustic analyses of developmental changes and emotional expression in the preverbal vocalizations of infants.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 509-529
      2. Available at: Accessed September 2, 2013.

        • Handel G.F.
        Shaw W. Messiah. Novello and Co, London, UK1958: 83-85
        • Howard D.M.
        • Angus J.A.S.
        Acoustic and Psychoacoustics.
        4th ed. Focal Press, Oxford, UK2009
      3. Available at: Accessed September 2, 2013.

        • Ternström S.
        • Bohman M.
        • Södersten M.
        Loud speech over noise: some spectral attributes, with gender differences.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 119: 1648-1665
        • Herbst C.T.
        Der Knabensolist in der Oper - Ein akustisches Portrait.
        L.O.G.O.S Interdisziplinär. 2006; 15 ([In German].): 166-174
        • Helmholtz H.
        On the Sensations of Tone, 2nd Edition of the 1885 Translation by AJ Ellis of the 4th Edition of 1877.
        Dover, New York, NY1954
        • Peterson G.E.
        • Barney H.L.
        Control methods used in study of the vowels.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1952; 24: 175-184
        • Sundberg J.
        Formant technique in a professional female singer.
        Acustica. 1975; 32: 89-96
        • Sundberg J.
        Level and center frequency of the singer's formant.
        J Voice. 2001; 15: 176-186
        • Titze I.R.
        Principles of Voice Production. 2nd printing. National Center for Voice and Speech.
        Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ2000
        • Fitch W.T.
        • Giedd J.
        Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1999; 106: 1511-1522
        • Mullen J.
        • Murphy D.T.
        • Howard D.M.
        Real-time dynamic articulations in the 2D waveguide mesh vocal tract model.
        IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process. 2007; 15: 577-585
        • Titze I.R.
        • Jin S.M.
        Is there evidence of a second singer's formant?.
        J Singing. 2003; 59: 329-331
        • Miller D.G.
        • Schutte H.K.
        Characteristic Patterns of Sub- and Supraglottal Pressure Variations Within the Glottal Cycle, in Transcripts of the XIIIth Symposium: Care of the Professional Voice.
        The Voice Foundation, New York, NY1984
        • Schutte H.K.
        • Miller D.G.
        Resonanzspiele der Gesangsstimme in ihren Beziehungen zu supra- und subglottalen Druckverläufen: Konsequenzen für die Stimmbildungstheorie.
        Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1988; 40 ([In German].): 65-73
      4. Herbst CT, Howard DM, Svec JG. The sound source in singing—basic principles and muscular adjustments for fine-tuning vocal timbre. In: Welch GF, Howard DM, Nix J, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Singing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; in press.

        • Titze I.R.
        Nonlinear source-filter coupling in phonation: theory.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 123: 2733-2749
        • Herbst C.T.
        • Ternström S.
        • Švec J.G.
        Investigation of four distinct glottal configurations in classical singing—a pilot study.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 125: EL104-EL109
        • Herbst C.T.
        • Howard D.M.
        • Schlömicher-Thier J.
        Using electroglottographic real-time feedback to control posterior glottal adduction during phonation.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 72-85
        • Sundberg J.
        • Fahlstedt E.
        • Morell A.
        Effects on the glottal voice source of vocal loudness variation in untrained female and male voices.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 117: 879-885
        • Barlow C.
        • Howard D.M.
        Electrolaryngographically derived voice source changes of child and adolescent singers.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2005; 30: 147-157
        • Monson B.B.
        • Lotto A.J.
        • Ternström S.
        Detection of high-frequency energy changes in sustained vowels produced by singers.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 129: 2263-2268
      5. Blood AJ, Zatorre RJ. Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001; 98:11818–11823.

        • de Abreu M.J.A.
        Goose bumps all over: breath, media, and tremor.
        Social Text. 2008; 26: 59-78
        • Sloboda J.
        Exploring the Musical Mind.
        Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK2005
        • Clift S.M.
        • Hancox G.
        The perceived benefits of singing: findings from preliminary surveys with a university college choral society.
        J R Soc Promot Health. 2001; 121: 248-256
      6. Bule, E. They Call it the Tingle Factor: Choral Singing has Huge Benefits on Both Curricular and Social Levels for Young People; Times Educational Supplement Scotland, TESS. 2008. Available at: Accessed September 2, 2013.