Effects of Melody and Technique on Acoustical and Musical Features of Western Operatic Singing Voices

Published:February 03, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.10.019



      The operatic singing technique is frequently used in classical music. Several acoustical parameters of this specific technique have been studied but how these parameters combine remains unclear. This study aims to further characterize the Western operatic singing technique by observing the effects of melody and technique on acoustical and musical parameters of the singing voice.


      Fifty professional singers performed two contrasting melodies (popular song and romantic melody) with two vocal techniques (with and without operatic singing technique). The common quality parameters (energy distribution, vibrato rate, and extent), perturbation parameters (standard deviation of the fundamental frequency, signal-to-noise ratio, jitter, and shimmer), and musical features (fundamental frequency of the starting note, average tempo, and sound pressure level) of the 200 sung performances were analyzed.


      The results regarding the effect of melody and technique on the acoustical and musical parameters show that the choice of melody had a limited impact on the parameters observed, whereas a particular vocal profile appeared depending on the vocal technique used.


      This study confirms that vocal technique affects most of the parameters examined. In addition, the observation of quality, perturbation, and musical parameters contributes to a better understanding of the Western operatic singing technique.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment


      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Collyer S.
        • Kenny D.T.
        • Archer M.
        Listener perception of the effect of abdominal kinematic directives on respiratory behavior in female classical singing.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 15-24
        • Lam Tang J.A.
        • Boliek C.A.
        • Rieger J.M.
        Laryngeal and respiratory behavior during pitch change in professional singers.
        J Voice. 2008; 22: 622-633
        • Sataloff R.T.
        Professional Voice: The Science and Art of Clinical Care.
        Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2005
        • Sundberg J.
        Articulatory configuration and pitch in a classically trained  soprano singer.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 546-551
        • Thalén M.
        • Sundberg J.
        Describing different styles of singing. A comparison of a female singer's voice source in “Classical”, “Pop”, “Jazz” and “Blue”.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2001; 26: 82-93
        • Thorpe C.W.
        • Cala S.J.
        • Chapman J.
        • Davis P.J.
        Patterns of breath support in projection of the singing voice.
        J Voice. 2001; 15: 86-104
        • Sundberg J.
        Perception of singing.
        in: Deutsch D. The Psychology of Music. Academic, San Diego, CA2013: 69-105
        • Brown W.S.
        • Rothman H.B.
        • Sapienza C.M.
        Perceptual and acoustic study of professionally trained versus untrained voices.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 301-309
        • Hunter E.J.
        • Svec J.G.
        • Titze I.R.
        Comparison of the produced and perceived voice range profiles in untrained and trained classical singers.
        J Voice. 2006; 20: 513-526
        • Mendes A.P.
        • Rothman H.B.
        • Sapienza C.
        • Brown W.S.
        Effects of vocal training on the acoustic parameters of the singing voice.
        J Voice. 2003; 17: 529-543
        • Ekholm E.
        • Papagiannis G.C.
        • Chagnon F.P.
        Relating objective measurements to expert evaluation of voice quality in Western classical singing: critical perceptual parameters.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 182-196
        • Rothman H.B.
        • Rullman J.F.
        • Arroyo A.A.
        Inter- and intrasubject changes in vibrato: perceptual and acoustic aspects.
        J Voice. 1990; 4: 309-316
        • Prame E.
        Measurements of the vibrato rate of ten singers.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1994; 94: 1979-1984
        • de Almeida Bezerra A.
        • Cukier-Blaj S.
        • Duprat A.
        • Camargo Z.
        • Granato L.
        The characterization of the vibrato in lyric and sertanejo singing styles: acoustic and perceptual auditory aspects.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 666-670
        • Howes P.
        • Callaghan J.
        • Davis P.
        • Kenny D.
        • Thorpe W.
        The relationship between measured vibrato characteristics and perception in Western operatic singing.
        J Voice. 2004; 18: 216-230
        • Stone R.E.
        • Cleveland T.F.
        • Sundberg J.
        • Prokop J.
        Aerodynamic and acoustical measures of speech, operatic, and Broadway vocal styles in a professional female singer.
        Q Prog Status Rep. 2002; 44: 17-29
        • Shipp T.
        • Leanderson R.
        • Sundberg J.
        Some acoustic characteristics of vocal vibrato.
        J Res Sing. 1980; 4: 18-25
        • Reid K.
        • Davis P.
        • Oates J.
        • Cabrera D.
        • Ternström S.
        • Black M.
        • Chapman J.
        The acoustic characteristics of professional opera singers performing in chorus versus solo mode.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 35-45
        • King J.B.
        • Horii Y.
        Vocal matching of frequency modulation in synthesized vowels.
        J Voice. 1993; 7: 151-157
        • Mürbe D.
        • Zahnert T.
        • Kuhlisch E.
        • Sundberg J.
        Effects of professional singing education on vocal vibrato—a longitudinal study.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 683-688
        • Moorcroft L.
        • Kenny D.T.
        Vocal warm-up produces acoustic change in singers' vibrato rate.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 667.e13-667.e18
        • Prame E.
        Vibrato extend and intonation in professional Western lyric singing.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 102: 616-621
        • Bretos J.
        • Sundberg J.
        Vibrato extent and intonation in professional Western lyric singing.
        J Voice. 2003; 17: 343-352
      1. Seashore CE. Psychology of Music. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1938:33–52.

        • Hirano M.
        • Hibi S.
        • Hagino S.
        Physiological aspects of vibrato.
        in: Dejonckere P. Hirano M. Sundberg J. Vibrato. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego, CA1995: 9-34
        • Barnes J.J.
        • Davis P.
        • Oates J.
        • Chapman J.
        The relationship between professional operatic soprano voice and high range spectral energy.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 116: 530-538
        • Omori K.
        • Kacker A.
        • Carroll L.M.
        • Riley W.D.
        • Blaugrund S.M.
        Singing power ratio: quantitative evaluation of singing voice quality.
        J Voice. 1996; 10: 228-235
        • Bloothooft G.
        • Plomp R.
        The timbre of sung vowels.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1988; 84: 847-860
        • Sundberg J.
        Level and center frequency of the singer's formant.
        J Voice. 2001; 15: 176-186
        • Lundy D.S.
        • Roy S.
        • Casiano R.R.
        • Xue J.W.
        • Evans J.
        Acoustic analysis of the singing and speaking voice in singing students.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 400-493
        • Ferguson S.
        • Kenny D.T.
        • Cabrera D.
        Effects of training on time-varying spectral energy and sound pressure level in nine male classical singers.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 39-46
        • Sundberg J.
        • Nordenberg M.
        Effects of vocal loudness variation on spectrum balance as reflected by the alpha measure of long-term average spectra of speech.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 120: 453-457
        • Sundberg J.
        • Gramming P.
        • Lovetri J.
        Comparisons of pharynx, source, formant, and pressure characteristics in operatic and musical theatre singing.
        J Voice. 1993; 7: 301-310
        • Butte C.J.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Song H.
        • Jiang J.J.
        Perturbation and nonlinear dynamic analysis of different singing styles.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 647-652
        • Lieberman P.
        Perturbations in vocal pitch.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1961; 33: 597-603
        • Lieberman P.
        Some acoustic measures of the fundamental periodicity of normal and pathological larynges.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1963; 35: 344-353
        • Zhang Y.
        • Jiang J.J.
        • Wallace S.M.
        Comparison of nonlinear dynamic methods and perturbation methods for voice analysis.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 118: 2551-2560
      2. Larrouy-Maestri P, Morsomme D. Criteria and tools for objectively analysing the vocal accuracy of a popular song. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. [Epub ahead of print].

        • Borch D.Z.
        • Sundberg J.
        Some phonatory and resonatory characteristics of the rock, pop, soul, and Swedish dance band styles of singing.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 532-537
        • Evans M.
        • Howard D.M.
        Larynx closed quotient in female belt and opera qualities: a case study.
        J Voice. 1993; 2: 7-14
        • Sundberg J.
        • Thalén M.
        What is “twang”?.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 654-660
        • Sundberg J.
        • Thalén M.
        • Popeil L.
        Substyles of belting: phonatory and resonatory characteristics.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 44-50
        • Björkner E.
        Musical theater and opera singing—why so different? A study of subglottal pressure, voice source, and formant frequency characteristics.
        J Voice. 2008; 22: 533-540
        • Estill J.
        Belting and classic voice quality: some physiological differences.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 1988; 3: 37-43
        • Schutte H.K.
        • Miller D.G.
        Belting and pop, nonclassical approaches to the female middle voice: some preliminary conclusions.
        J Voice. 1993; 7: 142-150
        • Barlow C.
        • Lovetri J.
        Closed quotient and spectral measures of female adolescent singers in different singing styles.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 314-318
      3. Barlow C, Lovetri J, Howard D. Voice source and acoustic measures of girls singing “classical” and “contemporary commercial” styles. AEC Edition, International Symposium of Performance Science. 2007:195–200.

        • Lebowitz A.
        • Baken R.J.
        Correlates of the belt voice: a broader examination.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 159-165
        • Collyer S.
        • David P.J.
        • Thorpe C.W.
        • Callaghan J.
        Sound pressure level and spectral balance linearity and symmetry in the messa di voce of female classical singers.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 121: 1728-1736
        • Collyer S.
        • David P.J.
        • Thorpe C.W.
        • Callaghan J.
        Fundamental frequency influences the relationship between sound pressure level and spectral balance in female classically trained singers.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126: 396-406
        • Boersma P.
        Praat: a system for doing phonetics by computer.
        Glot Int. 2001; 5: 341-345
        • Agresti A.
        An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis.
        Wiley, New York, NY1996
        • Dejonckere P.H.
        • Giordano A.
        • Schoentgen J.
        • Fraj S.
        • Bocchi L.
        • Manfredi C.
        To what degree of voice perturbation are jitter measurements valid? A novel approach with synthesized vowels and visuo-perceptual pattern recognition.
        Biomed Sig Process Control. 2012; 7: 37-42
        • Bunch M.
        • Chapman J.
        Taxonomy of singers used as subjects in scientific research.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 363-369
        • Lamarche A.
        • Ternström S.
        • Pabon P.
        The singer's voice range profile: female professional opera soloists.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 410-426
        • Ferrante I.
        Vibrato rate and extent in soprano voice: a survey on one century of singing.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2011; 130: 1683-1688
        • Sundberg J.
        • Romedahl C.
        Text intelligibility and the singer's formant—a relationship?.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 539-545
        • Sundberg J.
        • La F.M.
        • Gill B.P.
        Formant tuning strategies in professional male opera singers.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 278-288