Advertisement

Exploring the Relationship Between Spectral and Cepstral Measures of Voice and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)

  • Shaheen N. Awan
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Shaheen N. Awan, Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Bloomsburg University, 400 East Second St, Bloomsburg, PA 17815.
    Affiliations
    Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, Bloomsburg University of Pennsylvania, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania
    Search for articles by this author
  • Nelson Roy
    Affiliations
    Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
    Search for articles by this author
  • Seth M. Cohen
    Affiliations
    Division of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Duke Voice Care Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      Objectives

      The purpose of this study was to examine the strength of relationship between impairment-level acoustic measures derived from spectral- and cepstral-based analyses (including the cepstral peak prominence [CPP]; ratios of low vs high frequency spectral energy; and the respective standard deviations [SDs] for these measures) and a disablement measure (the total Voice Handicap Index [VHI] score) in a large and diverse group of voice-disordered and control subjects. The relationship between total VHI and the Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia (CSID—a multivariate estimate of dysphonia severity) was also examined.

      Methods

      Subjects were 332 adults (116 males and 216 females) comprised of voice-disordered subjects who presented to a physician with a voice-related complaint (n = 258) and a group of nonvoice-disordered control subjects (n = 74). A VHI 30-item score and speech/voice samples including the second and third sentences of The Rainbow Passage and productions of the sustained vowel /ɑ/ were obtained for each subject. Sentence and sustained vowel samples were analyzed using the Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV) program (ADSV model 5109 v.3.4.2; KayPENTAX, Montvale, NJ).

      Results

      Across all subjects, low-to-moderate strength Spearman rho (rs) correlations were observed between the total VHI and the CPP and the CSID in both speech and vowel contexts and for the CPP SD from continuous speech (rs's ranging from −0.45 to −0.49 for VHI vs CPP; 0.47 for VHI vs CSID; −0.44 for VHI vs CPP SD). Several other measures obtained from spectral or cepstral analyses also were observed to correlate with total VHI, although increased variability in the strength, direction, and overall significance of these other variables was observed depending on gender and elicited context.

      Conclusions

      Voice-related disablement occurs within a context. In contrast, impairment-level measures of phonatory function (like the spectral and cepstral measures included in this study) are by nature decontextualized and appear to correlate low-to-moderately with quality of life measures like the VHI. Therefore, spectral and cepstral acoustic measures and the VHI should be viewed as providing relatively unique, meaningful, and complementary information.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. International Classification of Impairments, Activities, and Participation (ICIDH-2). A Manual of Dimensions of Disablement and Functioning. Beta-1 Draft for Field Trials. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland1997
        • Ma E.P.
        • Yiu E.M.
        Voice activity and participation profile: assessing the impact of voice disorders on daily activities.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001; 44 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 511-524
        • Roy N.
        • Barkmeier-Kraemer J.
        • Eadie T.
        • et al.
        Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: a systematic review.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2013; 22 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 212-226
        • Jacobson B.
        • Johnson A.
        • Grywalski C.
        • et al.
        The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1997; 6 (Available at:) (Accessed February 13, 2013): 66-70
        • Rosen C.A.
        • Lee A.S.
        • Osborne J.
        • Zullo T.
        • Murry T.
        Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10.
        Laryngoscope. 2004; 114 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 1549-1556
        • Hogikyan N.D.
        • Sethuraman G.
        Validation of an instrument to measure voice-related quality of life (V-RQOL).
        J Voice. 1999; 13 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 557-569
        • Deary I.J.
        • Wilson J.A.
        • Carding P.N.
        • MacKenzie K.
        VoiSS: a patient-derived Voice Symptom Scale.
        J Psychosom Res. 2003; 54 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 483-489
        • Branski R.C.
        • Cukier-Blaj S.
        • Pusic A.
        • et al.
        Measuring quality of life in dysphonic patients: a systematic review of content development in patient-reported outcomes measures.
        J Voice. 2010; 24 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 193-198
        • Hsiung M.W.
        • Pai L.
        • Wang H.W.
        Correlation between voice handicap index and voice laboratory measurements in dysphonic patients.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002; 259 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 97-99
        • Wheeler K.M.
        • Collins S.P.
        • Sapienza C.M.
        The relationship between VHI scores and specific acoustic measures of mildly disordered voice production.
        J Voice. 2006; 20 (Available at:) (Accessed August 8, 2013): 308-317
        • Pribuisiene R.
        • Uloza V.
        • Kupcinskas L.
        • Jonaitis L.
        Perceptual and acoustic characteristics of voice changes in reflux laryngitis patients.
        J Voice. 2006; 20 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 128-136
        • Woisard V.
        • Bodin S.
        • Yardeni E.
        • Puech M.
        The voice handicap index: correlation between subjective patient response and quantitative assessment of voice.
        J Voice. 2007; 21 (Available at:) (Accessed April 11, 2012): 623-631
        • Cheng J.
        • Woo P.
        Correlation between the Voice Handicap Index and voice laboratory measurements after phonosurgery.
        Ear Nose Throat J. 2010; 89 (Available at:): 183-188
        • Niebudek-Bogusz E.
        • Woznicka E.
        • Zamyslowska-Szmytke E.
        • Sliwinska-Kowalska M.
        Correlation between acoustic parameters and Voice Handicap Index in dysphonic teachers.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2010; 62 (Available at:) (Accessed March 22, 2013): 55-60
        • Pavlidou E.
        • Printza A.
        • Hirani S.P.
        • Triaridis S.
        • Vital V.
        • Epstein R.
        Multidimensional evaluation of voice via subjective, acoustic and electroglottographic analyses in patients with LPR.
        Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 40: 25-32
        • Hanschmann H.
        • Lohmann A.
        • Berger R.
        Comparison of subjective assessment of voice disorders and objective voice measurement.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2011; 63 (Available at:) (Accessed August 8, 2013): 83-87
        • Fulljames N.
        • Harris S.
        Voice outcome measures: correlations with patients' assessment of their condition and the effectiveness of voice therapy.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2006; 31 (Available at:) (Accessed August 8, 2013): 23-35
        • Henry L.R.
        • Helou L.B.
        • Solomon N.P.
        • et al.
        Functional voice outcomes after thyroidectomy: an assessment of the Dsyphonia Severity Index (DSI) after thyroidectomy.
        Surgery. 2010; 147 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 861-870
        • Schindler A.
        • Mozzanica F.
        • Vedrody M.
        • Maruzzi P.
        • Ottaviani F.
        Correlation between the Voice Handicap Index and voice measurements in four groups of patients with dysphonia.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 141 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 762-769
        • Maryn Y.
        • Roy N.
        • De Bodt M.
        • Van Cauwenberge P.
        • Corthals P.
        Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126 (Available at:) (Accessed January 30, 2012): 2619-2634
        • Awan S.
        • Roy N.
        • Jetté M.
        • Meltzner G.
        • Hillman R.
        Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V.
        Clin Linguist Phon. 2010; 24 (Available at:) (Accessed August 2, 2013): 742-758
        • Awan S.
        • Roy N.
        Acoustic prediction of voice type in women with functional dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2005; 19 (Available at:) (Accessed April 17, 2012): 268-282
        • Awan S.
        • Roy N.
        • Dromey C.
        Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model.
        Clin Linguist Phon. 2009; 23 (Available at:) (Accessed February 9, 2012): 825-841
        • Peterson E.A.
        • Roy N.
        • Awan S.N.
        • Merrill R.M.
        • Banks R.
        • Tanner K.
        Toward validation of the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) as an objective treatment outcomes measure.
        J Voice. 2013; 27 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 401-410
        • Awan S.
        • Solomon N.
        • Helou L.
        • Stojadinovic A.
        Spectral-cepstral estimation of dysphonia severity: external validation.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013; 122: 40-48
        • Hillenbrand J.
        • Houde R.
        Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality: dysphonic voices and continuous speech.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1996; 39 (Available at:) (Accessed April 3, 2012): 311-321
        • Heman-Ackah Y.D.
        • Michael D.D.
        • Goding G.S.
        The relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2002; 16 (Available at:) (Accessed April 3, 2012): 20-27
        • Awan S.
        • Roy N.
        Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model.
        Clin Linguist Phon. 2006; 20 (Available at:) (Accessed April 3, 2012): 35-49
        • Behrman A.
        • Rutledge J.
        • Hembree A.
        • Sheridan S.
        Vocal hygiene education, voice production therapy, and the role of patient adherence: a treatment effectiveness study in women with phonotrauma.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008; 51 (Available at:) (Accessed April 7, 2013): 350-366
        • Fairbanks G.
        Voice and Articulation Drillbook.
        2nd ed. Harper & Row, New York, NY1960
        • Kempster G.B.
        • Gerratt B.R.
        • Verdolini Abbott K.
        • Barkmeier-Kraemer J.
        • Hillman R.E.
        Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009; 18 (Available at:) (Accessed February 9, 2012): 124-132
        • Hillenbrand J.
        • Cleveland R.
        • Erickson R.L.
        Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1994; 37 (Available at:) (Accessed April 3, 2012): 769-778
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        2nd ed. L. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1988 (Available at:) (Accessed March 19, 2012)
        • Hinkle D.
        • Wiersma W.
        • Jurs S.
        Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
        Rand McNally College Publishing, Chicago, IL1979
        • Roy N.
        • Gouse M.
        • Mauszycki S.C.
        • Merrill R.M.
        • Smith M.E.
        Task specificity in adductor spasmodic dysphonia versus muscle tension dysphonia.
        Laryngoscope. 2005; 115 (Available at:) (Accessed February 9, 2012): 311-316
        • Watts C.R.
        • Awan S.N.
        Use of spectral/cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from hypofunctional voices in sustained vowel.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011; 54: 1525-1538
        • Re D.
        • O'Connor J.
        • Bennett P.
        • Feinberg D.
        Preferences for very low and very high voice pitch in humans.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7 (Available at:) (Accessed September 22, 2013): 1-8
        • Collins S.
        Men's voices and women's choices.
        Anim Behav. 2000; 60 (Available at:) (Accessed October 2, 2013): 773-780
        • Klofstad C.
        • Anderson R.
        • Peters S.
        Sounds like a winner: voice pitch influences perception of leadership capacity in both men and women.
        Proc Biol Sci. 2012; 279 (Available at:) (Accessed September 28, 2013): 2698-2704
        • Field A.
        Discovering Statistics Using SPSS.
        3rd ed. Sage Publications Ltd, London, UK2009
        • Murry T.
        • Medrado R.
        • Hogikyan N.D.
        • Aviv J.E.
        The relationship between ratings of voice quality and quality of life measures.
        J Voice. 2004; 18 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 183-192
        • Webb A.L.
        • Carding P.N.
        • Deary I.J.
        • MacKenzie K.
        • Steen I.N.
        • Wilson J.A.
        Optimising outcome assessment of voice interventions, I: reliability and validity of three self-reported scales.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2007; 121 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 763-767
        • Eadie T.L.
        • Kapsner M.
        • Rosenzweig J.
        • Waugh P.
        • Hillel A.
        • Merati A.
        The role of experience on judgments of dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2010; 24 (Available at:) (Accessed August 7, 2013): 564-573