Advertisement

Utility and Safety of Commercially Available Injection Laryngoplasty Materials in a Rabbit Model

Published:December 10, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.008

      Summary

      Objective

      To demonstrate foreign body and chronic inflammatory reaction of commercially available injection materials using the rabbit vocal fold paralysis model.

      Study Design

      Animal study.

      Methods

      The left recurrent laryngeal nerve was identified and divided at the tracheoesophageal groove. Amounts (100 μL) of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), polyacrylamide hydrogel (Aquamid; Ferrosan A/S, Søborg, Denmark), calcium hydroxyapatite (Radiesse; BioForm Medical Inc., San Mateo, CA), or hyaluronic acid derivative (Rofilan; Rofil Medical International, Breda, Netherlands) were injected into the left vocalis muscle. Six months later, the larynx was harvested. Hematoxylin/eosin and Masson trichrome staining were performed to compare inflammatory and foreign body reactions, granuloma development, and relative vocal fold areas among groups.

      Results

      Compared with the PBS (control) group, the Aquamid, Radiesse, and Rofilan groups exhibited only mild chronic inflammatory reactions that did not significantly differ among groups, or from controls (P > 0.05). However, the Aquamid and Radiesse groups exhibited moderate foreign body reactions that were significantly greater than those of controls (P < 0.05). No foreign body granuloma formed in any group. All test groups exhibited significant increases in vocal fold areas at 6 months (P < 0.05).

      Conclusions

      Although commercially available injection materials induced more foreign body reactions than a control injection of PBS, no foreign body granuloma developed and the augmented vocal fold area was maintained until 6 months after injection.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Lee S.W.
        • Kim J.W.
        • Chung C.H.
        • Mok J.O.
        • Shim S.S.
        • Koh Y.W.
        • Choi E.C.
        Utility of injection laryngoplasty in the management of post-thyroidectomy vocal cord paralysis.
        Thyroid. 2010; 20: 513-517
        • Mallur P.S.
        • Rosen C.A.
        Vocal fold injection: review of indications, techniques, and materials for augmentation.
        Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 3: 177-182
        • Min J.Y.
        • Hong S.D.
        • Kim K.
        • Son Y.I.
        Long-term results of Artecoll injection laryngoplasty for patients with unilateral vocal fold motion impairment: safety and clinical efficacy.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 134: 490-496
        • Carroll T.L.
        • Rosen C.A.
        Long-term results of calcium hydroxylapatite for vocal fold augmentation.
        Laryngoscope. 2011; 121: 313-319
        • Lee S.W.
        • Son Y.I.
        • Kim C.H.
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Kim S.C.
        • Koh Y.W.
        Voice outcomes of polyacrylamide hydrogel injection laryngoplasty.
        Laryngoscope. 2007; 117: 1871-1875
        • Hertegard S.
        • Hallen L.
        • Laurent C.
        • Lindstrom E.
        • Olofsson K.
        • Testad P.
        • Dahlqvist A.
        Cross-linked hyaluronan versus collagen for injection treatment of glottal insufficiency: 2-year follow-up.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 2004; 124: 1208-1214
        • Lee S.W.
        • Kim J.W.
        • Koh Y.W.
        • Shim S.S.
        • Son Y.I.
        Comparative analysis of efficiency of injection laryngoplasty technique for with or without neck treatment patients: a transcartilaginous approach versus the cricothyroid approach.
        Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 3: 37-41
        • Kwon T.K.
        • Buckmire R.
        Injection laryngoplasty for management of unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004; 12: 538-542
        • Lee S.W.
        • Kim J.W.
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Chang H.S.
        • Kim H.K.
        • Choi E.C.
        Augmentation of vocal fold using a fat block implant following cordotomy through a minithyrotomy approach in a rabbit model.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 521-525
        • Khalmuratova R.
        • Jeon S.Y.
        • Kim D.W.
        • Kim J.P.
        • Ahn S.K.
        • Park J.J.
        • Hur D.G.
        Wound healing of nasal mucosa in a rat.
        Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009; 23: e33-e37
        • Tateya T.
        • Tateya I.
        • Sohn J.H.
        • Bless D.M.
        Histologic characterization of rat vocal fold scarring.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2005; 114: 183-191
        • DeFatta R.A.
        • Chowdhury F.R.
        • Sataloff R.T.
        Complications of injection laryngoplasty using calcium hydroxylapatite.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 614-618
        • Leuchter I.
        • Giovanni A.
        Revue De Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie. 2009; 130: 69-72
        • Shamanna S.G.
        • Bosch J.D.
        Injection laryngoplasty: a serious reaction to hyaluronic acid.
        J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 40: E39-E42
        • Chhetri D.K.
        • Jahan-Parwar B.
        • Hart S.D.
        • Bhuta S.M.
        • Berke G.S.
        Injection laryngoplasty with calcium hydroxylapatite gel implant in an in vivo canine model.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004; 113: 259-264
        • Sataloff R.T.
        • Hawkshaw M.J.
        Teflon granuloma.
        Ear Nose Throat J. 2000; 79: 422
        • Rosen C.A.
        • Statham M.M.
        Vocal fold injection as a treatment for glottic insufficiency: pro.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010; 136: 825-827
        • Randhawa P.S.
        • Ramsay A.D.
        • Rubin J.S.
        Foreign body reaction to polymethylsiloxane gel (bioplastique) after vocal fold augmentation.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2008; 122: 750-753
        • Tanna N.
        • Zalkind D.
        • Glade R.S.
        • Bielamowicz S.A.
        Foreign body reaction to calcium hydroxylapatite vocal fold augmentation.
        Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 132: 1379-1382