Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 31, ISSUE 4, P512.e1-512.e7, July 2017

Download started.

Ok

Validity and Reliability of a French Version of Reflux Symptom Index

  • Jérôme R. Lechien
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to and reprint requests to Jérôme R. Lechien, Laboratory of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Avenue du Champ de mars, 6, B7000 Mons, Belgium.
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium

    Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, RHMS Baudour, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kathy Huet
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Camille Finck
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Liège, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mohamad Khalife
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, RHMS Baudour, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Anne-Françoise Fourneau
    Affiliations
    Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, RHMS Baudour, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Véronique Delvaux
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Myriam Piccaluga
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as joint last authors.
    Bernard Harmegnies
    Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as joint last authors.
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Phonetics, Faculty of Psychology, Research Institute for Language Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as joint last authors.
    Sven Saussez
    Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as joint last authors.
    Affiliations
    Laboratory of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMONS), Mons, Belgium

    Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, RHMS Baudour, EpiCURA Hospital, Baudour, Belgium
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as joint last authors.
Published:January 06, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.11.020

      Summary

      Objective

      To develop a French version of the Reflux Symptom Index (Fr-RSI) and to assess its internal consistency, reliability, and clinical validity.

      Study Design

      Controlled, prospective trial.

      Materials and Methods

      Forty-four patients with a reflux finding score > 7 and an Fr-RSI > 13 were enrolled and treated with 20 mg of pantoprazole twice daily and diet changes for 3 months. Ninety asymptomatic subjects were also included in the study. To assess reliability, Fr-RSI was completed twice within a 7-day period. Validity was assessed by comparing Fr-RSI scores with scores from the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) in 24 of 44 patients, at baseline and at 3 months posttherapy.

      Results

      The mean values of Fr-RSI at baseline and after 7 days were 20.17 ± 5.76 and 19.75 ± 7.08, respectively, for patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and 4.02 ± 3.49 and 3.71 ± 3.82, respectively, for controls. The test-retest reliability was high in patients with LPR (rBP = 0.78) and in healthy subjects (rBP = 0.80). Cronbach's alpha was 0.85, indicating high internal consistency. The mean Fr-RSI score significantly improved from a baseline of 20.17 ± 5.76 to 5.58 ± 3.65 after 3 months of treatment (P = 0.001), and the initial mean VHI total score significantly improved from 20.29 ± 19.62 to 12.87 ± 12.04 after treatment (P = 0.029), indicating validity of the results. However, of the subcategories of the VHI, only the mean physical score improved from a baseline of 11.19 ± 9.22 to 7.35 ± 5.96 after treatment (P = 0.016).

      Conclusion

      The Fr-RSI developed in this study demonstrated both reliability and validity. It can be easily administered to assist in diagnosing and monitoring of LPR in French-speaking patients.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Koufman J.A.
        • Aviv J.E.
        • Casiano R.R.
        • et al.
        Laryngopharyngeal reflux: position statement of the committee on speech, voice, and swallowing disorders of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002; 127: 32-35
        • Koufman J.A.
        The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD): a clinical investigation of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury.
        Laryngoscope. 1991; 101: 1-78
        • Hopkins C.
        • Yousaf U.
        • Pedersen M.
        Acid reflux treatment for hoarseness.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006; (CD005054)
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Choi S.H.
        • Son Y.I.
        • et al.
        Prospective, observational study using rabeprazole in 455 patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2011; 268: 863-869
        • Wiener G.J.
        • Koufman J.A.
        • Wu W.C.
        • et al.
        Chronic hoarseness secondary to gastroesophageal reflux disease: documentation with 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 1989; 84: 1503-1508
        • Ossakow S.J.
        • Elta G.
        • Colturi T.
        • et al.
        Esophageal reflux and dysmotility as the basis for persistent cervical symptoms.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1987; 96: 387-392
        • Sataloff R.T.
        • Hawkshaw M.J.
        • Gupta R.
        Laryngopharyngeal reflux and voice disorders: an overview on disease mechanisms, treatments, and research advances.
        Discov Med. 2010; 10: 213-224
        • Jacob P.
        • Kahrilas P.J.
        • Herzon G.
        Proximal esophageal pH-metry in patients with “reflux laryngitis”.
        Gastroenterology. 1991; 100: 305-310
        • Eubanks T.R.
        • Omelanczuk P.E.
        • Maronian N.
        • et al.
        Pharyngeal pH monitoring in 222 patients with suspected laryngeal reflux.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2001; 5 (discussion 190-1): 183-190
        • Smit C.F.
        • Tan J.
        • Devriese P.P.
        • et al.
        Ambulatory pH measurements at the upper esophageal sphincter.
        Laryngoscope. 1998; 108: 299-302
        • Vincent Jr, D.A.
        • Garrett J.D.
        • Radionoff S.L.
        • et al.
        The proximal probe in esophageal pH monitoring: development of a normative database.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 247-254
        • Lechien J.R.
        • Finck C.
        • Costa de Araujo P.
        • et al.
        Voice outcomes of laryngopharyngeal reflux treatment: a systematic review of 1483 patients.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-3984-7
        • Belafsky P.C.
        • Postma G.N.
        • Koufman J.A.
        Laryngopharyngeal reflux symptoms improve before changes in physical findings.
        Laryngoscope. 2001; 111: 979-981
        • Belafsky P.C.
        • Postma G.N.
        • Koufman J.A.
        Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI).
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 274-277
        • Schindler A.
        • Mozzanica F.
        • Ginocchio D.
        • et al.
        Reliability and clinical validity of the Italian Reflux Symptom Index.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 354-358
        • Li J.
        • Zhang L.
        • Zhang C.
        • et al.
        Linguistic adaptation, reliability, validation, and responsivity of the Chinese version of reflux symptom index.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 104-108
        • Farahat M.
        • Malki K.H.
        • Mesallam T.A.
        Development of the Arabic version of Reflux Symptom Index.
        J Voice. 2012; 26 (e15-9): 814
        • Koufman J.A.
        Low-acid diet for recalcitrant laryngopharyngeal reflux: therapeutic benefits and their implications.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2011; 120: 281-287
        • Woisard V.
        • Bodin S.
        • Puech M.
        The Voice Handicap Index: impact of the translation in French on the validation.
        Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2004; 125: 307-312
        • Yelken K.
        • Yilmaz A.
        • Guven M.
        • et al.
        Paradoxical vocal fold motion dysfunction in asthma patients.
        Respirology. 2009; 14: 729-733
        • Lechien J.R.
        • Delvaux V.
        • Huet K.
        • et al.
        Phonetic approaches of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease: a prospective study.
        J Voice. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.020
        • Koufman J.A.
        Laryngopharyngeal reflux is different from classic gastroesophageal reflux disease.
        Ear Nose Throat J. 2002; 81: 7-9
        • Eckley C.A.
        • Costa H.O.
        Comparative study of salivary pH and volume in adults with chronic laryngopharyngitis by gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after treatment.
        Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 72: 55-60
        • Sereg-Bahar M.
        • Jerin A.
        • Jansa R.
        • et al.
        Pepsin and bile acids in saliva in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux—a prospective comparative study.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2015; 40: 234-239
        • Lechien J.R.
        • Huet K.
        • Khalife M.
        • et al.
        Impact of laryngopharyngeal reflux on subjective and objective voice assessments: a prospective study.
        J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; 45: 59
        • Siupsinskiene N.
        • Adamonis K.
        • Toohill R.J.
        Quality of life in laryngopharyngeal reflux patients.
        Laryngoscope. 2007; 117: 480-484