Curbing—The Metallic Mode In-between

An empirical study qualifying and categorizing restrained sounds known as Curbing based on audio perception, laryngostroboscopic imaging, acoustics, LTAS, and EGG

      Summary

      Objectives

      This study aims to study the categorization Curbing from the pedagogical method Complete Vocal Technique as a reduced metallic mode compared with the full metallic modes Overdrive and Edge by means of audio perception, laryngostroboscopic imaging, acoustics, long-term average spectrum (LTAS), and electroglottography (EGG).

      Methods

      Twenty singers were recorded singing sustained vowels in a restrained character known as Curbing. Two studies were performed: (1) laryngostroboscopic examination using a videonasoendoscopic camera system and the Laryngostrobe program; and (2) simultaneous recording of EGG and acoustic signals using Speech Studio. Images were analyzed based on consensus agreement. Statistical analysis of acoustic, LTAS, and EGG parameters was undertaken using Student paired t tests.

      Results

      The reduced metallic singing mode Curbing has an identifiable laryngeal gesture. Curbing has a more open setting than Overdrive and Edge, with high visibility of the vocal folds, and the false folds giving a rectangular appearance. LTAS showed statistically significant differences between Curbing and the full metallic modes, with less energy across all spectra, yielding a high second and a low third harmonic. Statistically significant differences were identified on Max Qx, Average Qx, Shimmer+, Shimmer−, Shimmer dB, normalized noise energy, cepstral peak prominence, harmonics-to-noise ratio, and mean sound pressure level (P ≤ 0.05).

      Conclusion

      Curbing as a voice production strategy is statistically significantly different from Overdrive and Edge, and can be categorized based on audio perception. This study demonstrates consistently different laryngeal gestures between Curbing and Overdrive and Edge, with high corresponding differences in LTAS, EGG and acoustic measures.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • McGlashan J.
        • Thuesen M.A.
        • Sadolin C.
        Overdrive and edge as refiners of “belting”?: an empirical study qualifying and categorizing “belting” based on audio perception, laryngostroboscopic imaging, acoustics, LTAS, and EGG.
        J Voice. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.006
        • Sadolin C.
        Complete Vocal Technique.
        Shout Publishing, Copenhagen2010
        • Brixen E.B.
        • Sadolin C.
        • Kjelin H.
        On acoustic detection of vocal modes.
        (132nd Convention of the Audio Engineering Society)2012 (Budapest, Hungary)
        • Brixen E.B.
        • Sadolin C.
        • Kjelin H.
        Acoustical characteristics of vocal modes in singing.
        (The 134th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society)2013 (Rome, Italy)
        • Brixen E.B.
        • Sadolin C.
        • Kjelin H.
        The importance of onset features in listeners' perception of vocal modes in singing.
        (Paper presented at; the 137th Convention of the Audio Engineering Society)2014 (Los Angeles, CA)
        • Zangger Borch D.
        • Sundberg J.
        Some phonatory and resonatory characteristics of the rock, pop, soul, and Swedish dance band styles of singing.
        J Voice. 2010; 25: 532-537
        • Lovetri J.
        Contemporary commercial music.
        J Voice. 2008; 22: 259-262
        • Lovetri J.
        The confusion about belting: a personal observation.
        J N Y Singing Teach Assoc. 2012; 10: 4-7
        • Zangger Borch D.
        • Sundberg J.
        • Lindestad P.-Å.
        • et al.
        Vocal fold vibration and voice source aperiodicity in “dist” tones: a study of timbral ornament in rock singing.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2004; 29: 147-153
        • Kovačić G.
        • Boersma P.
        • Domitrovic H.
        Long-term average spectra in professional folk singing voices: a comparison of the Klapa and Dozivacki styles.
        Inst Phon Sci. 2003; 25: 53-64
        • McGlashan J.
        • Sayles M.
        • Sadolin C.
        • et al.
        Vocal effects in singing: a study of intentional distortion using laryngostroboscopy and electrolaryngography.
        (Paper presented at; the 10th International Conference on Advance in Quantitative Laryngology, Voice and Speech Research)2013 (Cincinnati, OH)
        • Estill J.
        Belting and classic voice quality—some physiological differences.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 1988; 3: 37-43
        • Titze I.
        Belting and a high larynx position.
        J Singing. 2007; 63: 557-558
        • Hanayama E.M.
        • Camargo Z.A.
        • Tsuji D.H.
        • et al.
        Metallic voice: physiological and acoustic features.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 62-70
        • Clapham R.P.
        • van As-Brooks C.J.
        • van Son R.J.
        • et al.
        The relationship between acoustic signal typing and perceptual evaluation of tracheoesophageal voice quality for sustained vowels.
        J Voice. 2015; 29 (e523-519): 517
        • Bier S.D.
        • Watson C.I.
        • McCann C.M.
        Using the perturbation of the contact quotient of the EGG waveform to analyze age differences in adult speech.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 267-273
        • Sundberg J.
        The Science of the Singing Voice.
        Northern Illinois University Press, DeKalb, IL1987
        • Laryngograph
        Speech Studio Users Guide.
        Laryngograph, Wallington, UK2011
        • Johnson A.
        • Kempster G.
        Classification of the classical male singing voice using long-term average spectrum.
        J Voice. 2010; 25: 538-543
        • da Silva P.T.
        • Master S.
        • Andreoni S.
        • et al.
        Acoustic and long-term average spectrum measures to detect vocal aging in women.
        J Voice. 2010; 25: 411-419
        • Sundberg J.
        • Thalen M.
        Respiratory and acoustical differences between belt and neutral style of singing.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 418-425
        • Fant G.
        Acoustic Theory of Speech Production: With Calculations Based on X-ray Studies of Russian Articulations. Vol. 2. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, Germany1971
        • Yanagisawa E.
        • Estill J.
        • Kmucha S.
        • et al.
        The contribution of aryepiglottic constriction to “ringing” voice quality—a videolaryngoscopic study with acoustic analysis.
        J Voice. 1989; 3: 342-350
        • Yanagida S.
        • Nishizawa N.
        • Mizoguchi K.
        • et al.
        Voice onset time for the word-initial voiceless consonant /t/ in Japanese spasmodic dysphonia—a comparison with normal controls.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 450-454
        • Lawrence V.
        Laryngeological observations on belting.
        J Res Singing. 1979; 2: 26-28
        • Miles B.
        • Hollien H.
        Whither belting?.
        J Voice. 1990; 4: 64-70
        • Schutte H.
        • Miller D.
        Belting and pop, nonclassical approaches to the female middle voice: some preliminary considerations.
        J Voice. 1993; 7: 142-150
        • Weiss R.
        • Brown Jr, W.S.
        • Morris J.
        Singer's formant in sopranos: fact or fiction.
        J Voice. 2001; 15: 457-468