Common Vocal Effects and Partial Glottal Vibration in Professional Nonclassical Singers

      Summary

      Objective

      To multidimensionally investigate common vocal effects in experienced professional nonclassical singers, to examine their mechanism of production and reproducibility, to demonstrate the existence of partial glottal vibration, and to assess the potential of damage to the voice from nonclassical singing.

      Study Design

      Individual cohort study.

      Methods

      Ten male singers aged between 25 and 46 years (34 ± 7 years [mean ± SD]) with different stylistic backgrounds were recruited (five pop/rock/metal, five musical theater). Participants repeatedly presented the usual nonclassical vocal effects and techniques in their repertoire. All performances were documented and analyzed using established instruments (eg, auditory-perceptual assessment, videolaryngostroboscopy, electroglottography, voice function diagnostics).

      Results

      The vocal apparatus of all singers was healthy and capable of high performance. Typical nonclassical vocal effects were breathy voice, creaky voice, vocal fry, grunting, distortion, rattle, belt, and twang. All effects could be easily differentiated from each other. They were intraindividually consistently repeatable and also interindividually produced in a similar manner. A special feature in one singer was the first evidence of partial glottal vibration when belting in the high register. The unintended transition to this reduced voice quality was accompanied by physical fatigue and inflexible respiratory support.

      Conclusion

      The long-lasting use of the investigated nonclassical vocal effects had no negative impact on trained singers. The possibility of long-term damage depends on the individual constitution, specific use, duration, and extent of the hyperfunction. The incidence of partial glottal vibration and its consequences require continuing research to learn more about efficient and healthy vocal function in nonclassical singing.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Amarante Andrade P.
        • Švec J.G.
        Observational study of differences in head position for high notes in famous classical and non-classical male singers.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2016; 41: 77-84
        • Barlow C.
        • Lovetri J.
        Closed quotient and spectral measures of female adolescent singers in different singing styles.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 314-318
        • Burns P.
        Acoustical analysis of the underlying voice differences between two groups of professional singers: opera and country and western.
        Laryngoscope. 1986; 96: 549-554
        • Howard D.M.
        Acoustics of the trained versus untrained singing voice.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009; 17: 155-159
        • Mayr A.
        Investigating the voce faringea: physiological and acoustic characteristics of the bel canto tenor's forgotten singing practice.
        J Voice. 2016; (pii: S0892-1997(16)30108-4. [Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.06.010
        • McHenry M.A.
        • Evans J.
        • Powitzky E.
        Effects of bel canto training on acoustic and aerodynamic characteristics of the singing voice.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 198-204
        • Graham E.
        • Angadi V.
        • Sloggy J.
        • et al.
        Contribution of glottic insufficiency to perceived breathiness in classically trained singers.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 2016; 31: 179-184
        • Dromey C.
        • Heaton E.
        • Hopkin J.A.
        The acoustic effects of vowel equalization training in singers.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 678-682
        • Herbst C.T.
        • Hess M.
        • Müller F.
        • et al.
        Glottal adduction and subglottal pressure in singing.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 391-402
        • Mürbe D.
        • Pabst F.
        • Hofmann G.
        • et al.
        Effects of a professional solo singer education on auditory and kinesthetic feedback—a longitudinal study of singers' pitch control.
        J Voice. 2004; 18: 236-241
        • Mürbe D.
        • Zahnert T.
        • Kuhlisch E.
        • et al.
        Effects of professional singing education on vocal vibrato—a longitudinal study.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 683-688
        • Salomoni S.
        • van den Hoorn W.
        • Hodges P.
        Breathing and singing: objective characterization of breathing patterns in classical singers.
        PLoS ONE. 2016; 11 (e0155084)
        • Collyer S.
        • Kenny D.T.
        • Archer M.
        Listener perception of the effect of abdominal kinematic directives on respiratory behavior in female classical singing.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: e15-e24
        • Ferguson S.
        • Kenny D.T.
        • Mitchell H.F.
        • et al.
        Change in messa di voce characteristics during 3 years of classical singing training at the tertiary level.
        J Voice. 2013; 27 (e-35-e48): 523
        • Haben C.M.
        Voice rest and phonotrauma in singers.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 2012; 27: 165-168
        • Schutte H.K.
        • Stark J.A.
        • Miller D.G.
        Change in singing voice production, objectively measured.
        J Voice. 2003; 17: 495-501
        • Hallqvist H.
        • Lã F.M.
        • Sundberg J.
        Soul and musical theater: a comparison of two vocal styles.
        J Voice. 2016; (pii: S0892-1997(16)30209-0. [Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.020
        • Kayes G.
        • Welch G.F.
        Can genre be “heard” in scale as well as song tasks? An exploratory study of female singing in western lyric and musical theater styles.
        J Voice. 2016; (pii: S0892-1997(16)30113-8. [Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.015
        • Wendler J.
        • Dejonckere P.H.
        • Wienhausen S.
        • et al.
        Therapeutic consequences from changing voice ideals (clear to harsh, pleasant to jarring): summarizing report on a round-table discussion at the 5th World Voice Congress, Luxor, Egypt, 27–31 October 2012.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2014; 39: 188-190
        • Guzman M.
        • Lanas A.
        • Olavarria C.
        • et al.
        Laryngoscopic and spectral analysis of laryngeal and pharyngeal configuration in non-classical singing styles.
        J Voice. 2015; 29 (e-21-e28): 130
        • Guzman M.
        • Barros M.
        • Espinoza F.
        • et al.
        Laryngoscopic, acoustic, perceptual, and functional assessment of voice in rock singers.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2013; 65: 248-256
        • Thalén M.
        • Sundberg J.
        Describing different styles of singing: a comparison of a female singer's voice source in “classical”, “pop”, “jazz” and “blues”.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2001; 26: 82-93
        • Vanhecke F.
        • Lebacq J.
        • Moerman M.
        • et al.
        Physiology and acoustics of inspiratory phonation.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 769.e9-769.e18
        • Sapthavee A.
        • Yi P.
        • Sims H.S.
        Functional endoscopic analysis of beatbox performers.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 328-331
        • Sadolin C.
        Complete Vocal Technique.
        Shout Publishing, Copenhagen2010
        • Bourne T.
        • Garnier M.
        • Samson A.
        Physiological and acoustic characteristics of the male music theatre voice.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2016; 140: 610
        • DeLeo LeBorgne W.
        • Lee L.
        • Stemple J.C.
        • et al.
        Perceptual findings on the broadway belt voice.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 678-689
        • Lebowitz A.
        • Baken R.J.
        Correlates of the belt voice: a broader examination.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 159-165
        • Echternach M.
        • Popeil L.
        • Traser L.
        • et al.
        Vocal tract shapes in different singing functions used in musical theater singing—a pilot study.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 653.e1-653.e7
        • Schutte H.K.
        • Miller D.G.
        Belting and pop, nonclassical approaches to the female middle voice: some preliminary considerations.
        J Voice. 1993; 7: 142-150
        • Bourne T.
        • Kenny D.
        Vocal qualities in music theater voice: perceptions of expert pedagogues.
        J Voice. 2016; 30 (e1–e12): 128
        • Sundberg J.
        • Gramming P.
        • Lovetri J.
        Comparisons of pharynx, source, formant, and pressure characteristics in operatic and musical theatre singing.
        J Voice. 1993; 7: 301-310
        • Bourne T.
        • Garnier M.
        Physiological and acoustic characteristics of the female music theater voice.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 131: 1586-1594
        • Roll C.
        The evolution of the female broadway belt voice: implications for teachers and singers.
        J Voice. 2016; 30 (e1–e9): 639
        • Tokuda I.T.
        • Zemke M.
        • Kob M.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical modeling of register transitions and the role of vocal tract resonators.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 127: 1528-1536
        • Bunch M.
        • Chapman J.
        Taxonomy of singers used as subjects in scientific research.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 363-369
        • Caffier P.P.
        • Schmidt B.
        • Gross M.
        • et al.
        A comparison of white light laryngostroboscopy versus autofluorescence endoscopy in the evaluation of vocal fold pathology.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 1729-1734
        • McGlashan J.
        • Thuesen M.A.
        • Sadolin C.
        Overdrive and edge as refiners of “belting”?: an empirical study qualifying and categorizing “belting” based on audio perception, laryngostroboscopic imaging, acoustics, LTAS, and EGG.
        J Voice. 2016; (pii: S0892-1997(16)30218-1. [Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.006
        • Svec J.G.
        • Schutte H.K.
        Kymographic imaging of laryngeal vibrations.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012; 20: 458-465
        • Ptok M.
        • Schwemmle C.
        • Iven C.
        • et al.
        On the auditory evaluation of voice quality.
        HNO. 2006; 54: 793-802
        • Johnson A.M.
        • Kempster G.B.
        Classification of the classical male singing voice using long-term average spectrum.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 538-543
        • Fantini M.
        • Fussi F.
        • Crosetti E.
        • et al.
        Estill Voice Training and voice quality control in contemporary commercial singing: an exploratory study.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2016; ([Epub ahead of print]): 1-7
        • Thuesen M.A.
        • McGlashan J.
        • Sadolin C.
        Curbing-The metallic mode in-between: an empirical study qualifying and categorizing restrained sounds known as Curbing based on audio perception, laryngostroboscopic imaging, acoustics, LTAS, and EGG.
        J Voice. 2017; (pii: S0892-1997(16)30414-3; Epub ahead of print)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.01.010
        • Estill J.
        Belting and classic voice quality: some physiological differences.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 1988; 3: 37-43
        • Yanagisawa E.
        • Estill J.
        • Kmucha S.T.
        • et al.
        The contribution of aryepiglottic constriction to “ringing” voice quality—a videolaryngoscopic study with acoustic analysis.
        J Voice. 1989; 3: 342-350
        • Gill B.P.
        • Herbst C.T.
        Voice pedagogy—what do we need?.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2016; 41: 168-173
        • Beeman S.A.
        Perceptions of voice teachers regarding students' vocal behaviors during singing and speaking.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 111.e19-111.e28
        • D'haeseleer E.
        • Claeys S.
        • Meerschman I.
        • et al.
        Vocal characteristics and laryngoscopic findings in future musical theater performers.
        J Voice. 2017; (pii: S0892-1997(16)30416-7. [Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.11.018
        • Abou-Elsaad T.
        • Baz H.
        • Afsah O.
        • et al.
        Validation and adaptation of the singing voice handicap index for egyptian singing voice.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 130.e1-130.e6
        • Zeroual C.
        • Esling J.H.
        • Crevier-Buchman L.
        The contribution of supraglottic laryngeal adjustments to voice: phonetic evidence from Arabic.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2008; 33: 3-11
        • Morton J.
        The integration of voice and dance techniques in musical theatre: anatomical considerations.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 2015; 30: 71-77
        • Titze I.R.
        • Winholtz W.S.
        Effect of microphone type and placement on voice perturbation measurements.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1993; 36: 1177-1190
        • Svec J.G.
        • Granqvist S.
        Guidelines for selecting microphones for human voice production research.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010; 19: 356-368
        • Zuckerwar A.J.
        • Kuhn T.R.
        • Serbyn R.M.
        Background noise in piezoresistive, electret condenser, and ceramic microphones.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 113: 3179-3187