Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 5, P802.e1-802.e9, September 2019

Influence of Noise Resulting From the Location and Conditions of Classrooms and Schools in Upper Egypt on Teachers' Voices

      Summary

      Purpose

      Teachers are professional voice users, always at high risk of developing voice disorders due to high vocal demand and unfavorable environmental conditions. This study aimed at identifying possible correlations between teachers' voice symptoms and their perception of noise, the location of schools, as well as the location and conditions of their classrooms.

      Method

      One hundred forty teachers (ages 21–56) from schools in Upper Egypt participated in this study. They filled out a questionnaire including questions about the severity and frequency of their voice symptoms, noise perception, and the location and conditions of their schools and classrooms. Questionnaire responses were statistically analyzed to identify possible correlations.

      Results

      There were significant correlations (P < 0.05) between voice symptoms, teachers' noise perception, and noise resulting from the location and conditions of schools and classrooms. Teachers experienced severe dysphonia, neck pain, and increased vocal effort with weekly or daily recurrence. Among the teachers who participated in the study, 24.2% felt they were always in a noisy environment, with 51.4% of the total participants reporting having to raise their voices. The most common sources of noise were from student activities and talking in the teachers' own classrooms (61.4%), noise from adjacent classrooms (52.9%), and road traffic (40.7%).

      Conclusions

      Adverse effect on teachers' voices due to noise from poor school and classroom conditions necessitates solutions for the future improvement of conditions in Egyptian schools. This study may help future studies that focus on developing guidelines for the better planning of Egyptian schools in terms of improved infrastructure and architecture, thus considering the general and vocal health of teachers.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Levak K.
        • Horvat M.
        • Domitrovic H.
        Effects of Noise on Humans.
        (ELMAR, 2008. 50th International Symposium. Vol 1: IEEE)2008 (333–336)
        • Guski R.
        • Felscher-Suhr U.
        • Schuemer R.
        The concept of noise annoyance: how international experts see it.
        J Sound Vib. 1999; 223: 513-527https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1998.2173
        • Cutiva L.C.C.
        • Puglisi G.E.
        • Astolfi A.
        • et al.
        Four-day follow-up study on the self-reported voice condition and noise condition of teachers: relationship between vocal parameters and classroom acoustics.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 120.e1-120.e8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.017
        • Durup N.
        • Shield B.M.
        • Dance S.
        • et al.
        Teachers' voice parameters and classroom acoustics—a field study and online survey.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141: 3540https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4987482
        • Rantala L.M.
        • Hakala S.
        • Holmqvist S.
        • et al.
        Classroom noise and teachers' voice production.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015; 58: 1397-1406https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0248
        • Kristiansen J.
        • Lund S.P.
        • Persson R.
        • et al.
        A study of classroom acoustics and school teachers' noise exposure, voice load and speaking time during teaching, and the effects on vocal and mental fatigue development.
        Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2014; 87: 851-860https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-014-0927-8
        • Ilomäki I.
        • Leppänen K.
        • Kleemola L.
        • et al.
        Relationships between self-evaluations of voice and working conditions, background factors, and phoniatric findings in female teachers.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009; 34: 20-31https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430802042013
        • Thibeault S.L.
        • Merrill R.M.
        • Roy N.
        • et al.
        Occupational risk factors associated with voice disorders among teachers.
        Ann Epidemiol. 2004; 14: 786-792https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.03.004
        • Shield B.
        • Dockrell J.E.
        External and internal noise surveys of London primary schools.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2004; 115: 730-738https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1635837
        • Harght P.
        • Coffeen R.C.
        Comparing classroom acoustics in green and nongreen schools.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2008; 124: 2588https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4783209
        • ANSI.S12.60-2002
        American National Standard Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools.
        (Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America)2002: 1-36
        • Koszarny Z.
        • Goryński P.
        Exposure of schoolchildren and teachers to noise at school.
        Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig. 1990; 41: 297-310
        • Rogerson J.
        • Dodd B.
        Is there an effect of dysphonic teachers' voices on children's processing of spoken language?.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 47-60https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.007
        • Nelson P.
        The changing demand for improved acoustics in our schools.
        Volta Rev. 1999; 101: 23-31
        • Åhlander V.L.
        • Rydell R.
        • Löfqvist A.
        Speaker's comfort in teaching environments: voice problems in Swedish teaching staff.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 430-440https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.12.006
        • Vilkman E.
        Voice problems at work: a challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2000; 52: 120-125https://doi.org/10.1159/000021519
        • Cutiva L.C.C.
        • Vogel I.
        • Burdorf A.
        Voice disorders in teachers and their associations with work-related factors: a systematic review.
        J Commun Disord. 2013; 46: 143-155https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.01.001
        • Tiesler G.
        • Oberdörster M.
        Noise—a stressor? Acoustic ergonomics of schools.
        Build Acoust. 2008; 15: 249-261
        • Berg F.S.
        • Blair J.C.
        • Benson P.V.
        Classroom acoustics: the problem, impact, and solution.
        Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1996; 27: 16-20https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.2701.16
        • Bottalico P.
        • Astolfi A.
        • Hunter E.J.
        Teachers' voicing and silence periods during continuous speech in classrooms with different reverberation times.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141: EL26-EL31https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4973312
        • Puglisi G.E.
        • Astolfi A.
        • Cantor Cutiva L.C.
        • et al.
        Four-day-follow-up study on the voice monitoring of primary school teachers: relationships with conversational task and classroom acoustics.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141: 441-452https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4973805
        • Astolfi A.
        • Carullo A.
        • Pavese L.
        • et al.
        Duration of voicing and silence periods of continuous speech in different acoustic environments.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2015; 137: 565-579https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4906259
        • Durup N.
        • Shield B.
        • Dance S.
        • et al.
        An investigation into relationships between classroom acoustic measurements and voice parameters of teachers.
        Build Acoust. 2015; 22: 225-241
        • Hunter E.J.
        • Bottalico P.
        • Graetzer S.
        • et al.
        Teachers and teaching: speech production accommodations due to changes in the acoustic environment.
        Energy Procedia. 2015; 78: 3102-3107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.764
        • Åhlander V.L.
        • García D.P.
        • Whitling S.
        • et al.
        Teachers' voice use in teaching environments: a field study using ambulatory phonation monitor.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 841.e5-841.e15https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.03.006
        • Bottalico P.
        • Astolfi A.
        Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 131: 2817-2827https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3689549
        • Pelegrín-García D.
        • Brunskog J.
        Speakers' comfort and voice level variation in classrooms: laboratory research.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2012; 132: 249-260https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4728212
        • Bolbol S.A.
        • Zalat M.M.
        • Hammam R.A.
        • et al.
        Risk factors of voice disorders and impact of vocal hygiene awareness program among teachers in public schools in Egypt.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 251.e9-251.e16https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.010
        • Abo-Hasseba A.
        • Waaramaa T.
        • Alku P.
        • et al.
        Difference in voice problems and noise reports between teachers of public and private schools in Upper Egypt.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 508.e11-508.e16https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.016
        • AboulKheir A.E.
        Consideration of primary school design standards with reference to Egyptian schools [doctoral dissertation].
        1967https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-000089241
        • Ibrahim N.
        Efforts for improving buildings conditions in public schools in Egypt: SWOT analysis of two governmental renovation programs.
        ([master thesis] American University in Cairo. Available at) (Accessed March 27, 2018)
        • El Baradei M.
        • El Baradei L.
        Needs assessment of the education sector in Egypt.
        (ZEF Bildungsstudie, Cairo. Available at) (Accessed March 27, 2018)
        • Hamdy A.
        Survey of ICT and education in Africa: Egypt Country Report.
        (Available at) (Accessed March 27, 2018)
        • Ali S.A.
        Investigation of the dose–response relationship for road traffic noise in Assiut, Egypt.
        Appl Acoust. 2004; 65: 1113-1120https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.06.007
        • Ali S.A.
        Railway noise levels, annoyance and countermeasures in Assiut, Egypt.
        Appl Acoust. 2005; 66: 105-113https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2004.06.005
        • Ali S.A.
        Study effects of school noise on learning achievement and annoyance in Assiut City, Egypt.
        Appl Acoust. 2013; 74: 602-606https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2012.10.011
        • Zaki G.R.
        Assessment of ambient noise levels in the urban residential streets of Eastern Alexandria, Egypt.
        J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2012; 87: 96-103https://doi.org/10.1097/01.EPX.0000421367.39770.52
        • Martin S.
        • Darnley L.
        The Teaching Voice.
        2 ed. Whurr, London2004
        • Awad H.S.
        • Farag H.H.
        • Hanafi M.A.
        • et al.
        Architectural acoustics in educational facilities: An empirical study on university classrooms in Egypt.
        (Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics 164ASA. Vol 18: ASA)2012https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4772593 (015002)
        • Herrera L.
        Participation in school upgrading: gender, class and (in) action in Egypt.
        Int J Educ Dev. 2003; 23: 187-199https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00013-5
        • Lombard E.
        Le signe de I'elevation de la voix, Annals Maladiers Oreille.
        Larynx Nez Pharynx. 1911; 37: 101-119
        • Lee J.
        • Ali H.
        • Ziaei A.
        • et al.
        The Lombard effect observed in speech produced by cochlear implant users in noisy environments: a naturalistic study.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2017; 141: 2788-2799https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4979927
        • Augustyńska D.
        • Kaczmarska A.
        • Mikulski W.
        • et al.
        Assessment of teachers' exposure to noise in selected primary schools.
        Arch Acoust. 2010; 35: 521-542https://doi.org/10.2478/v10168-010-0040-2
        • Bronder A.
        Study of phenomenon of voice disorders in the population of teachers and the prevention rules.
        ([doctor's thesis]. Institute of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health in Sosnowiec, Sosnowiec, Poland)2003
        • World Health Organization
        The physical school environment: an essential element of a health-promoting school.
        (Available at:) (Accessed March 27, 2018)
        • Van Renterghem T.
        • Botteldooren D.
        • Verheyen K.
        Road traffic noise shielding by vegetation belts of limited depth.
        J Sound Vib. 2012; 331: 2404-2425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.01.006
        • Gordon D.E.
        Green schools as high performance learning facilities.
        (National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Available at) (Accessed March 27, 2018)
        • Moussa M.
        • Mostafa Y.
        • Elwafa A.
        School site selection process.
        Procedia Environ Sci. 2017; 37: 282-293https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.059
        • Vintturi J.
        • Alku P.
        • Sala E.
        • et al.
        Loading-related subjective symptoms during a vocal loading test with special reference to gender and some ergonomic factors.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2003; 55: 55-69https://doi.org/10.1159/000070088
        • Laukkanen A.-M.
        • Järvinen K.
        • Artkoski M.
        • et al.
        Changes in voice and subjective sensations during a 45-min vocal loading test in female subjects with vocal training.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004; 56: 335-346https://doi.org/10.1159/000081081
        • Laukkanen A.-M.
        • Kankare E.
        Vocal loading-related changes in male teachers' voices investigated before and after a working day.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2006; 58: 229-239https://doi.org/10.1159/000093180
        • Zhai G.
        • Zhang B.
        The design of ventilation and sound insulation window.
        Noise Vib Control. 2004; 1: 014
        • Berglund B.
        • Hassmen P.
        • Job R.S.
        Sources and effects of low-frequency noise.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1996; 99: 2985-3002https://doi.org/10.1121/1.414863
        • Waye K.P.
        • Rylander R.
        • Benton S.
        • et al.
        Effects on performance and work quality due to low frequency ventilation noise.
        J Sound Vib. 1997; 205: 467-474https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1997.1013
        • Leventhall G.
        • Pelmear P.
        • Benton S.
        A review of published research on low frequency noise and its effects.
        (Available at) (Accessed March 27, 2018)
        • Baliatsas C.
        • van Kamp I.
        • van Poll R.
        • et al.
        Health effects from low-frequency noise and infrasound in the general population: is it time to listen? A systematic review of observational studies.
        Sci Total Environ. 2016; 557: 163-169https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.065
        • Zhisheng L.
        • Dongmei L.
        • Sheng M.
        • et al.
        Noise impact and improvement on indoors acoustic comfort for the building adjacent to heavy traffic road.
        Chin J Popul Resour Environ. 2007; 5: 17-25https://doi.org/10.1080/10042857.2007.10677482
        • Munier C.
        • Farrell R.
        Working conditions and workplace barriers to vocal health in primary school teachers.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 127.e31-127.e41https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.004
        • Thomas G.
        • Kooijman P.
        • Cremers C.
        • et al.
        A comparative study of voice complaints and risk factors for voice complaints in female student teachers and practicing teachers early in their career.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck. 2006; 263: 370-380https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-005-1010-6
        • Egypt
        World data on education.
        (Available at) (Accessed March 27, 2018)
        • Ministry of Education
        National strategic plan for pre-university education reform in Egypt 2007/08–2011/12.
        (Cairo)2007
        • American National Standards Institute/Acoustical Society of America
        S12.60-2009/Part 2 American National Standard Acoustical Performance Criteria DR, and Guidelines for Schools, Part 2: Relocatable Classroom Factors.
        (Melville, NY: Acoustical Society of America)2009