Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 33, ISSUE 5, P620-626, September 2019

Comparative Anatomy of Pig Arytenoid Cartilage and Human Arytenoid Cartilage

      Summary

      Objective

      This study aims to investigate the feasibility of pig arytenoid cartilage as an animal model for simulating arytenoidectomy under microlaryngoscope by comparing the similarities and differences between pig arytenoid cartilage and human arytenoid cartilage.

      Study Design

      This is a methodological study on the excised pig arytenoid cartilage and human arytenoid cartilage.

      Methods

      Five excised human adult cadaver larynges and five adult excised porcine larynges were dissected and all the soft tissue and mucous membrane attached to the arytenoid and cricoarytenoid joint were removed. The anatomical structure and morphology of the arytenoid cartilage were observed and measured with a vernier caliper. Measurements included cricoarytenoid articular facet major and minor diameter, cricoarytenoid articular facet center distance, cricoarytenoid facet major and minor diameter, length of vocal process and muscular process, and distance between tip of vocal process, muscular process, and junction/apex of arytenoid cartilage. Data were then compared across these major anatomic markers using student t test.

      Results

      The gross anatomy of the pig arytenoid cartilage was similar to the human. However, the size of the pig larynx arytenoid cartilage was obviously larger in total, and there was statistical significance for almost all measurements (P < 0.05), except the mean value of cricoarytenoid articular facet center distance, the cricoarytenoid facet minor diameter, and the length of vocal process of pig and human, without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Moreover, the biggest differences between the pig arytenoid cartilage and the human arytenoid cartilage were that the pig arytenoid cartilage apex had the angle winding structure toward the back, and that the posterior part of the bilateral arytenoid cartilages was partially connected. Whereas after the angle winding was removed from the junction, pig arytenoid cartilage and human arytenoid cartilage were shaped both like a triangular pyramid.

      Conclusion

      The data of this metric comparative study indicate that pig arytenoid, after resecting the angle winding structure and incising the interarytenoid cartilage, is similar to the human's. Therefore, pig larynx is an appropriate experimental model for endoscopic arytenoidectomy. In addition, regarding the pig laryngeal angle winding structure, we still require further basic and clinical research to clarify its physiological function and significance.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Schook L.B.
        • Collares T.V.
        • Darfour-Oduro K.A.
        • et al.
        Unraveling the swine genome: implications for human health.
        Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2015; 3: 219-244
        • Swindle M.M.
        • Makin A.
        • Herron A.J.
        • et al.
        Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing.
        Vet Pathol. 2011; 49: 344-356
        • Cooper D.K.
        • Ekser B.
        • Ramsoondar J.
        • et al.
        The role of genetically engineered pigs in xenotransplantation research.
        J Pathol. 2016; 238: 288-299
        • Nasser Kotby M.
        • Wahba H.A.
        • Kamal E.
        • et al.
        Animal model for training and improvement of the surgical skills in endolaryngeal microsurgery.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 351-357
        • Yilmaz T.
        • Altuntas O.M.
        • Suslu N.
        • et al.
        Total and partial laser arytenoidectomy for bilateral vocal fold paralysis.
        Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 3601612
        • Garrett C.G.
        • Coleman J.R.
        • Reinisch L.
        Comparative histology and vibration of the vocal folds: implications for experimental studies in microlaryngeal surgery.
        Laryngoscope. 2000; 110: 814-824
        • Riley J.L.
        • Riley W.D.
        • Carroll L.M.
        Frequency characteristics in animal species typically used in laryngeal research: an exploratory investigation.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 717-767
        • Alipour F.
        • Jaiswal S.
        Glottal airflow resistance in excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 40-50
        • Zrunek M.
        • Happak W.
        • Hermann M.
        • et al.
        Comparative anatomy of human and sheep laryngeal skeleton.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 1988; 105: 155-162
        • Jiang J.J.
        • Raviv J.R.
        • Hanson D.G.
        Comparison of the phonation-related structures among pig, dog, white-tailed deer, and human larynges.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016; 110: 1120-1125
        • Kim M.J.
        • Hunter E.J.
        • Titze I.R.
        Comparison of human, canine, and ovine laryngeal dimensions.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004; 113: 60-68
        • Tayama N.
        • Chan R.W.
        • Kaga K.
        • et al.
        Geometric characterization of the laryngeal cartilage framework for the purpose of biomechanical modeling.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001; 110: 1154-1161
        • Klockars T.
        • Kinnari T.J.
        An affordable model for endolaryngeal phonomicrosurgery: chicken wings and foam pipe insulation tube.
        Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 1906-1908
        • Kus L.H.
        • Negandhi J.
        • Sklar M.C.
        • et al.
        Angiogenesis in costal cartilage graft laryngotracheoplasty: a corrosion casting study in piglets.
        Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 2411-2417
        • Connor M.P.
        • Brown A.
        • Palazzolo M.
        • et al.
        Effect of vocal fold injection of cidofovir and bevacizumab in a porcine model.
        JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014; 140: 155
        • King W.
        • Teare J.
        • Vandrevala T.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of a novel Surgicric®cricothyroidotomy device for emergency tracheal access in a porcine model.
        Anaesthesia. 2016; 71: 177-184
        • Nishio N.
        • Fujimoto Y.
        • Suga K.
        • et al.
        Autologous fat injection therapy including a high concentration of adipose-derived regenerative cells in a vocal fold paralysis model: animal pilot study.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130: 914-922
        • Lau D.P.
        • Chng C.B.
        • Choo J.Q.
        • et al.
        Development of a microclip for laryngeal microsurgery: initial animal studies.
        Laryngoscope. 2012; 122: 1809-1814
        • Foerster G.
        • Arnold D.
        • Bischoff S.
        • et al.
        Pre-clinical evaluation of a minimally invasive laryngeal pacemaker system in mini-pig.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; 273: 151-158
        • Woodson G.
        Developing a porcine model for study of vocal fold scar.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 706-710
        • Bakhshaee H.
        • Young J.
        • Yang J.C.W.
        • et al.
        Determination of strain field on the superior surface of excised larynx vocal folds using DIC.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 659-667
        • Wrona E.A.
        • Peng R.
        • Born H.
        • et al.
        Derivation and characterization of porcine vocal fold extracellular matrix scaffold.
        Laryngoscope. 2016; 126: 928-935
        • Paskhover B.
        • Wadie M.
        • Sasaki C.T.
        Thyroarytenoid cross-innervation by the external branch of the superior laryngeal nerve in the porcine model.
        Laryngoscope. 2015; 125: 177-179
        • Lang A.
        • Koch R.
        • Rohn K.
        • et al.
        Histomorphometric analysis of collagen and elastic fibres in the cranial and caudal fold of the porcine glottis.
        Anat Histol Embryol. 2015; 44: 186-199
        • Folk D.
        • Paskhover B.
        • Wadie M.
        • et al.
        External branch of the superior laryngeal nerve mediated glottic closing force in the porcine model.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016; 125: 421-424
        • Knight M.J.
        • McDonald S.E.
        • Birchall M.A.
        Intrinsic muscles and distribution of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the pig larynx.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 262: 281-285
        • Stevens K.A.
        • Thomson S.L.
        • Jetté M.E.
        • et al.
        Quantification of porcine vocal fold geometry.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 416-426
        • Ajmani M.L.
        A metrical study of the laryngeal skeleton in adult Nigerians.
        J Anat. 1990; 171: 187-191
        • Jotz G.P.
        • Stefani M.A.
        • Pereira Da Costa Filho O.
        • et al.
        A morphometric study of the larynx.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 668-672
        • Eckel H.E.
        • Sittel C.
        • Zorowka P.
        • et al.
        Dimensions of the laryngeal framework in adults.
        Surg Radiol Anat. 1994; 16: 31-36
        • Sprinzl G.M.
        • Eckel H.E.
        • Sittel C.
        • et al.
        Morphometric measurements of the cartilaginous larynx: an anatomic correlate of laryngeal surgery.
        Head Neck. 1999; 21: 743-750
        • Joshi M.
        • Joshi S.
        • Joshi S.
        Morphometric study of cricoid cartilages in Western India.
        Australas Med J. 2011; 4: 542-547