Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 3, P487.e21-487.e30, May 2020

A Pilot Study Assessing the Therapeutic Potential of a Vibratory Positive Expiratory Pressure Device (Acapella Choice) in the Treatment of Voice Disorders

  • Brian Saccente-Kennedy
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Brian Saccente-Kennedy, Speech and Language Therapy (ENT), The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, 330 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8DB, United Kingdom.
    Affiliations
    Speech and Language Therapy (ENT), The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Pedro Amarante Andrade
    Affiliations
    Faculty of Sport, Health and Wellbeing, Department of Health and Wellbeing, Plymouth Marjon University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ruth Epstein
    Affiliations
    Speech and Language Therapy (ENT), The Royal National Throat, Nose and Ear Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
    Search for articles by this author
Published:October 26, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.019

      Summary

      Introduction

      Semioccluded vocal tract exercises (SOVTEs) can involve a single source of vibration (eg, vocal folds in the straw exercise) or a dual source of vibration (eg, vocal folds and water bubbling in tube phonation) in the vocal tract. Oftentimes, this secondary source of vibration causes large oscillations in intraoral pressure and has been likened to a "massage effect." This study assesses the implementation of a positive expiratory pressure device (Acapella Choice) as a possible alternative SOVTE, which presents a secondary source of vibration without the need of a water container.

      Methods

      Twenty-two normophonic participants underwent acoustic, electroglottographic, and aerodynamic assessment before, during, and after phonation with two different established SOTVEs (silicone tube in water and straw in air) in addition to Acapella Choice.

      Results

      Acapella Choice produced the largest peak-to-peak amplitudes of intraoral pressure oscillation. Straw in air produced the largest static intraoral pressure. Straw in air and Acapella Choice presented significantly larger ranges of static pressures than tube in water phonation. Post-exercise condition showed a statistically larger sound pressure level for Acapella Choice.

      Conclusions

      Positive expiratory pressure devices, such as Acapella Choice, may be a promising alternative to established SOVTEs as it promotes large oscillatory pressures in the vocal tract without the need for a water container. This exercise also produces larger sound pressure level with no significant changes in glottic contact quotient, indicating improved vocal economy.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Middendorf JH.
        Phonotrauma in children: management and treatment.
        ASHA Lead. 2007;
        • Lã FMB
        • Wistbacka G
        • Andrade PA
        • et al.
        Real-time visual feedback of airflow in voice training: aerodynamic properties of two flow ball devices.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 390.e1-390.e8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.024
        • Mills R
        • Hays C
        • Al-Ramahi J
        • et al.
        Validation and evaluation of the effects of semi-occluded face mask straw phonation therapy methods on aerodynamic parameters in comparison to traditional methods.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 323-328https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.04.009
        • Awan SN
        • Gartner-Schmidt JL
        • Timmons LK
        • et al.
        Effects of a variably occluded face mask on the aerodynamic and acoustic characteristics of connected speech in patients with and without voice disorders.
        J Voice. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.002
        • Titze IR
        • Finnegan E
        • Laukkanen A-M
        • et al.
        Raising lung pressure and pitch in vocal warm-ups: the use of flow-resistant straws.
        J Sing. 2002;
        • Andrade PA
        • Wood G
        • Ratcliffe P
        • et al.
        Electroglottographic study of seven semi-occluded exercises: LaxVox, straw, lip-trill, tongue-trill, humming, hand-over-mouth, and tongue-trill combined with hand-over-mouth.
        J Voice. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.11.004
        • Story BH
        • Laukkanen AM
        • Titze IR
        Acoustic impedance of an artificially lengthened and constricted vocal tract.
        J Voice. 2000; https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80003-X
        • Titze IR
        • Story BH
        Acoustic interactions of the voice source with the lower vocal tract.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418246
        • Enflo L
        • Sundberg J
        • Romedahl C
        • et al.
        Effects on vocal fold collision and phonation threshold pressure of resonance tube phonation with tube end in water.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013; https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0040)
        • Granqvist S
        • Simberg S
        • Hertegård S
        • et al.
        Resonance tube phonation in water: high-speed imaging, electroglottographic and oral pressure observations of vocal fold vibrations—a pilot study.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015; https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2014.913682
        • Wistbacka G
        • Sundberg J
        • Simberg S
        Vertical laryngeal position and oral pressure variations during resonance tube phonation in water and in air. A pilot study.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2016; https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2015.1028101
        • Amarante Andrade P
        • Wistbacka G
        • Larsson H
        • et al.
        The flow and pressure relationships in different tubes commonly used for semi-occluded vocal tract exercises.
        J Voice. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.02.004
        • Simberg S
        • Laine A
        The resonance tube method in voice therapy: description and practical implementations.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2007; https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430701207790
        • Guzmán M
        • Castro C
        • Madrid S
        • et al.
        Air pressure and contact quotient measures during different semioccluded postures in subjects with different voice conditions.
        J Voice. 2016; 30 (759.e1–759.e10)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.010
        • Radolf V
        • Laukkanen A
        • Horacek J
        • et al.
        In vivo measurements of air pressure, vocal folds vibration and acoustic characteristics of phonation into a straw and resonance tube used in vocal exercising.
        in: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference Engineering Mechanics, Czech Republic. 2013: 478-483
        • Sovijärvi A
        Die Bestimmung der Stimmkategorien mittels Resonanzröhren [voice classification according to resonance tubes].
        in: Fifth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Basel, NY. 1965
      1. Sihvo M, Denizoglu I. LaxVox voice therapy technique (downloadable handouts). http://laxvox.com/documents/LAXVOX%20handouts.pdf.

        • Patterson JE
        • Hewitt O
        • Kent L
        • et al.
        Acapella (R) versus 'usual airway clearance’ during acute exacerbation in bronchiectasis: a randomized crossover trial.
        Chron Respir Dis. 2007; 4: 67-74https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972306075483
        • Horáček J
        • Radolf V
        • Bula V
        • et al.
        Experimental investigation of air pressure and acoustic characteristics of human voice. Part 1: measurement in vivo.
        in: 18th International Conference Engineering Mechanics, Svratka, Czech Republic. 2012: 403-417
        • Guzman M
        • Muñoz D
        Do different semi-occluded voice exercises affect vocal fold adduction differently in subjects diagnosed with hyperfunctional dysphonia?.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2015; 67: 68-75https://doi.org/10.1159/000437353
        • Wistbacka G
        • Andrade PA
        • Simberg S
        • et al.
        Resonance tube phonation in water-the effect of tube diameter and water depth on back pressure and bubble characteristics at different airflows.
        J Voice. 2018; 32 (126.e11–126.e22)
        • Mueller G
        • Bersch-Porada I
        • Koch-Borner S
        • et al.
        Laboratory evaluation of four different devices for secretion mobilization: Acapella choice, green and blue versus water bottle.
        Respir Care. 2014; 59: 673-677https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.02654
        • Cochrane DJ.
        Vibration exercise: the potential benefits.
        Int J Sports Med. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268010
        • Guzman M
        • Higueras D
        • Fincheira C
        • et al.
        Immediate acoustic effects of straw phonation exercises in subjects with dysphonic voices.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2013; https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2012.731079
        • Guzman M
        • Laukkanen A-M
        • Krupa P
        • et al.
        Vocal tract and glottal function during and after vocal exercising with resonance tube and straw.
        J Voice. 2013; 27 (523.e19–523.e34)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.02.007
        • Gaskill CS
        • Erickson ML
        The effect of a voiced lip trill on estimated glottal closed quotient.
        J Voice. 2008; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.03.012
        • Gaskill CS
        • Quinney DM
        The effect of resonance tubes on glottal contact quotient with and without task instruction: a comparison of trained and untrained voices.
        J Voice. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.03.003
        • Gaskill CS
        • Erickson ML
        The effect of an artificially lengthened vocal tract on estimated glottal contact quotient in untrained male voices.
        J Voice. 2010; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.05.004
        • Laukkanen AM
        • Mäki E
        • Leppänen K
        Electroglottogram-based estimation of vocal economy: “quasi-output-cost ratio.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2009; 61: 316-322https://doi.org/10.1159/000252847
        • Awan SN
        • Roy N
        • Jetté ME
        • et al.
        Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V.
        Clin Linguist Phon. 2010; 24: 742-758https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2010.492446
        • Chen G
        • Feng X
        • Shue Y
        • et al.
        On using voice source measures in automatic gender classification of children's speech.
        InterSpeech. 2010; 2010: 673-676
        • Zraick R
        • Smith-Olinde L
        • Shotts L
        Adult normative data for the KayPENTAX phonatory aerodynamic system model 6600.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 164-176
        • Klich R
        Relationships of vowel characteristics to listener ratings of breathiness.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1982;
        • Cochrane DJ
        The potential neural mechanisms of acute indirect vibration.
        J Sport Sci Med. 2011; https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1268010
        • Mester J
        • Kleinöder H
        • Yue Z
        Vibration training: benefits and risks.
        J Biomech. 2006; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.02.015
        • Nigg BM
        Impact forces in running.
        Curr Opin Orthop. 1997; https://doi.org/10.1097/00001433-199712000-00007