Evaluating Safety of Awake, Bilateral Injection Laryngoplasty for Bilateral Vocal Fold Atrophy

  • Zachary Kelly
    Affiliations
    Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Anju K. Patel
    Affiliations
    Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Emory Voice Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Adam M. Klein
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Adam M. Klein, Emory Voice Center, Emory University Hospital Midtown, 550 Peachtree Street, Suite 9-4400, Atlanta 30308, GA.
    Affiliations
    Department of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery, Emory Voice Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
    Search for articles by this author

      Summary

      Objective

      Office-based injection laryngoplasty (IL) has emerged as a useful procedure for otolaryngologists to correct glottic insufficiency while avoiding the costs and risks of general anesthesia. This is the first study focused on addressing the safety of bilateral IL for bilateral vocal fold (VF) atrophy.

      Methods

      Patient records were reviewed from Emory University Hospital Midtown during the period of 2005 to 2017. Patients who underwent awake, bilateral transthyrohyoid, transoral, transcricothyroid, or transthyroid cartilage IL for bilateral VF atrophy were analyzed. All procedures, including repeat injections, were bilateral. Complication rate was used to evaluate safety. Patients with vocal cord paralysis, paresis, scar, and sulcus were excluded from the study.

      Results

      Total 174 procedures met inclusion criteria. There were four complications, yielding a complication rate of 2.3%. Complications included aborted cases for difficult anatomy or poor patient tolerance, injection material not resorbing, and a VF hematoma. No patients had any airway emergencies or required admission to the hospital or evaluation in the emergency room.

      Conclusions

      This study illustrates a low complication rate for awake, bilateral IL in treating bilateral VF atrophy. This supports other studies that promote the safety of this procedure in the awake setting. Complications were associated with patient tolerance, unique anatomy, and in one case, anticoagulant medication. The low complication rate supports the conclusion that bilateral medialization IL is safe to perform in the office-based, awake setting.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brunings W
        Uber eine neue behandlungsmethode der rekurrenslahmung.
        Verh Ver Laryngol. 1911; 18: 151
        • Mallur PS
        • Rosen CA
        Vocal fold injection: review of indications, techniques and materials for augmentation.
        Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; 3: 177-182
        • Sulica L
        • Rosen CA
        • Postma GN
        • et al.
        Current practice in injection augmentation of the vocal folds: indications, treatment principles, techniques, and complications.
        Laryngoscope. 2010; 120: 319-325
        • Ward PH
        • Hanson DG
        • Abemayor E
        Transcutaneous Teflon injection of the paralyzed vocal fold: a new technique.
        Laryngoscope. 1985; 95: 644-649
        • Mallur PS
        • Rosen CA
        Office-based laryngeal injection.
        Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013; 46: 85-100
        • Bove MJ
        • Jabbour N
        • Krishna P
        • et al.
        Operating room versus office-based injection laryngoplasty: a comparative analysis of reimbursement.
        Laryngoscope. 2007; 117: 226-230
        • Chhetri DK
        • Jamal N
        Percutaneous injection laryngoplasty.
        Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 742-745
        • Birkent H
        • Sardesai M
        • Hu A
        • et al.
        Prospective study of voice outcomes and patient tolerance of in-office percutaneous injection laryngoplasty.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 1759-1762
        • Postma GN
        • Blalock DP
        • Koufman JA
        Bilateral medialization laryngoplasty.
        Laryngoscope. 1998; 108: 1429-1434
        • Johns MM
        • Arviso LC
        • Ramadan F
        Challenges and opportunities in the management of the aging voice.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 145: 1-7
        • Jonathan GR
        • David HA
        • Patel N
        • et al.
        Acute and subacute awake injection laryngoplasty for thoracic surgery patients.
        J Voice. 2006; 22: 245-250
        • Andrew JB
        • Huang TL
        • Benninger MS
        • et al.
        Medialization laryngoplasty in the elderly: outcomes and expectations.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017; 157: 664-669
        • Ryu CH
        • Han S
        • Lee MS
        • et al.
        Voice changes in elderly adults: prevalence and the effect of social, behavioral, and health status on voice quality.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015; 63: 1608-1614
        • Roy N
        • Stemple J
        • Merrill RM
        • et al.
        Epidemiology of voice disorders in the elderly: preliminary findings.
        Laryngoscope. 2007; 117: 628-633
        • Golub JS
        • Chen PH
        • Otto KJ
        • et al.
        Prevalence of perceived dysphonia in a geriatric population.
        Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54: 1736-1739
        • Davids T
        • Klein AM
        • Johns MM
        Current dysphonia trends in patients over the age of 65: is vocal atrophy becoming more prevalent?.
        Laryngoscope. 2012; 122: 332-335
        • Sielska-Badurek EM
        • Sobol M
        • Jędra K
        • Rzepakowska A
        • Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E
        • Niemczyk K
        Injection larynoplasty as miniinvasive office-based surgery in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis—voice quality outcomes.
        Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017; 12: 277-284
        • Mathison CC
        • Villari CR
        • Klein AM
        • Johns MM
        Comparison of outcomes and complications between awake and asleep injection laryngoplasty: a case-control study.
        Laryngoscope. 2009; 119: 1417-1423