Bipedicled Vocal Fold Mucosal Flap Use in Phonomicrosurgery: Case Series



      The objective of this study was to present a novel surgical technique involving the use of a “bipedicled vocal fold mucosal flap” to repair a mucosal defect and to evaluate the outcomes of patients in whom it was used.

      Material and methods

      This was a retrospective study of 6 clinical cases. All patients underwent surgery between November 2000 and July 2018, and all procedures were performed by the same surgeon. For the auditory-perceptual assessment, the Grade-Roughness-Breathiness-Asthenia-Strain hoarseness scale was used. We based the stroboscopic evaluation on the European Laryngological Society protocol, analyzing the parameters glottal closure, mucosal wave, and phase symmetry.


      Ages at the time of surgery ranged from 10 to 52 years, and all of the patients were male. Preexisting vocal fold lesions included polyps, cysts, a sulcus, and mucosal bridges. Among the stroboscopic parameters, only the mucosal wave differed significantly between the preoperative and postoperative periods (P = 0.046). There were also significant postoperative improvements in the overall grade of dysphonia (P = 0.025) and in the degree of breathiness (P = 0.025).


      The use of a bipedicled vocal fold mucosal flap appears to promote significant improvements in the mucosal wave and in voice quality. In the patients evaluated here, the technique was used without preoperative planning. However, it proved to be a safe and appropriate means of repairing mucosal defects in the vocal folds, with the potential to preserve rheological properties and promote healing with less chance of fibrosis.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Woo P
        • Casper J
        • Colton R
        • et al.
        Aerodynamic and stroboscopic findings before and after microlaryngeal phonosurgery.
        J Voice. 1994; 8: 186-194
        • Hirano M
        Morphological structure of the vocal fold.
        Folia Phoniatr. 1974; 26: 89-94
        • Courey MS
        • Gardner GM
        • Stone RE
        • et al.
        Endoscopic vocal fold microflap: a three-year experience.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995; 104: 267-273
        • Garrett CG
        • Coleman JR
        • Reinisch L
        Comparative histology and vibration of the vocal folds: implications for experimental studies in microlaryngeal surgery.
        Laryngoscope. 2000; 110: 814-824
        • Hirano M
        Clinical Examination of Voice: Disorders of Human Communication.
        Springer – Verlag, Wien – New York1981
        • Dejonckere PH
        • Bradley P
        • Clemente P
        • et al.
        Committee on phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS). A basic protocol for functional assessment of voice pathology, especially for investigating the efficacy of (phonosurgical) treatments and evaluating new assessment techniques. Guideline elaborated by the committee on phoniatrics of the European Laryngological Society (ELS).
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001; 258: 77-82
        • Rousseau B
        • Hirano S
        • Chan RW
        • et al.
        Characterization of chronic vocal fold scarring in a rabbit model.
        J Voice. 2004; 18: 116-124
        • Rosen CA
        • Simpson B
        Operative Techniques in Laryngology.
        Springer Science & Business Media, 2008
        • Rzepakowska A
        • Sielska-Badurek E
        • Osuch-Wójcikiewicz E
        • et al.
        Multiparametric assessment of voice quality and quality of life in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery—correlation between subjective and objective methods.
        J Voice. 2018; 32 (257.e21-30)
        • Nemr K
        • Simões-Zenari M
        • de Souza GS
        • et al.
        Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and gender in Brazilians with and without voice disorders.
        J Voice. 2015; 30: 765.e7-765.e11
        • Hakkesteegt MM
        • Brocaar MP
        • Wieringa MH
        • et al.
        The relationship between perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric evaluation of dysphonia severity.
        J Voice. 2008; 22: 138-145