Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 35, ISSUE 4, P663.e1-663.e7, July 2021

Download started.

Ok

Do Phonatory Aerodynamic and Acoustic Measures in Connected Speech Differ Between Vocally Healthy Adults and Patients Diagnosed with Muscle Tension Dysphonia?

Published:January 13, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.12.019

      Summary

      Objectives

      One of the presumed etiologies of primary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD) is a respiratory-phonatory disruption resulting in poor phonatory airflow in speech; however, few data exist on the differences between vocally healthy adults and patients diagnosed with MTD. The goal of this study was to compare aerodynamic and acoustic measures of self-perceived vocally healthy adults with patients diagnosed with MTD.

      Study Design

      Retrospective, observational, matched cohort study.

      Methods

      Vocally healthy adults age 19–60 years were matched on age, gender, and body mass index (BMI) to patients diagnosed with MTD. Recorded samples of the first four sentences of The Rainbow Passage were analyzed for between-group differences in the following acoustic and aerodynamic dependent measures in connected speech: mean airflow during voicing, breath number, reading passage duration, inspiratory and expiratory durations, phonation time, inspiratory and expiratory volumes, cepstral peak prominence (CPP), CPP standard deviation (CPP SD), low to high ratio (L/H ratio), L/H ratio SD, CPP Fo, CPP Fo SD, cepstral spectral index of dysphonia, and dB sound pressure level (SPL).

      Results

      One hundred and seventy participants were studied; 85 patients diagnosed with primary MTD and 85 vocally healthy control participants. The two groups differed significantly in mean SPL, duration of the reading passage, and inspiratory and expiratory airflow duration (P ≤ 0.003). No significant differences were observed between the groups on any other phonatory aerodynamic or acoustic measure. Mean SPL, duration of the reading passage, and inspiratory and expiratory airflow durations were lower and longer, respectively, in patients with MTD. Ranges and standard deviations were greater for all aerodynamic and acoustic measurements in patients with MTD.

      Conclusion

      Large variability in aerodynamic and acoustic measurements were observed in patients with primary MTD with no salient differences at the group level compared to vocally healthy participants. Individual phonatory aerodynamic and acoustic profiles should be used when setting goals for patient treatment plans and to track response to treatment for patients with MTD. Taken in its entirety, connected speech from patients diagnosed with MTD essentially reflect normal acoustic and aerodynamic values.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Morrison M
        • Rammage L
        • Belisle GM
        • et al.
        Muscular tension dysphonia.
        J Otolaryngol. 1983; 12: 302-306
      1. Classification Manual for Voice Disorders - I.
        in: Verdolini K Rosen CA Branski RC Classification Manual for Voice Disorders - I. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ2006
        • Kunduk M
        • Fink DS
        • McWhorter AJ
        Primary muscle tension dysphonia.
        Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep. 2016; 4: 175-182
        • Awan SN
        • Roy N
        Outcomes measurement in voice disorders: application of an acoustic index of dysphonia severity.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009; 52: 482-499
        • Roy N
        Functional dysphonia.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003; 11: 144-148
        • Roy N
        Assessment and treatment of musculoskeletal tension in hyperfunctional voice disorders.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008; 10: 195-209
        • Roy N
        • Leeper HA
        Effects of the manual laryngeal musculoskeletal tension reduction technique as a treatment for functional voice disorders: perceptual and acoustic measures.
        J Voice. 1993; 7: 242-249
        • Gillespie AI
        • Gartner-Schmidt J
        • Rubinstein EN
        • et al.
        Aerodynamic profiles of women with muscle tension dysphonia/aphonia.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013; 56: 481-488
        • Morrison M
        Pattern recognition in muscle misuse voice disorders: how I do it.
        J Voice. 1997; 11: 108-114
        • Hixon TJ
        • Hoit JD
        Evaluation and Management of Speech Breathing Disorders: Principles and Methods.
        Reddington Brown LLC, Tucson, Arizona2005
        • Morrison M
        • Rammage L
        Muscle misuse voice disorders: description and classification.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 1993; 113: 428-434
        • Stone RE
        Management of functional voice disorders: functional dysphonia.
        in: Stemple JC Voice Therapy: Clinical Studies. Mosby, Ann Arbor, MI1993: 186
        • Bassiouny S
        Efficacy of the accent method of voice therapy.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 1998; 50: 146-164
        • Gartner-Schmidt J
        Flow phonation.
        in: Stemple J Hapner E Voice Therapy Clinical Case Studies. 4th ed. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2014
        • Verdolini Abbott K
        Clinician Manual: Casper-Stone Confidential Voice Therapy.
        Multivoicedimensions e-Publication, Kankakee, IL2011
        • da Cunha Pereira G
        • de Oliveira Lemos I
        • Dalbosco Gadenz C
        • et al.
        Effects of voice therapy on muscle tension dysphonia: a systematic literature review.
        J Voice. 2018; 32: 546-552
        • Watts CR
        • Hamilton A
        • Toles L
        • et al.
        A randomized controlled trial of stretch-and-flow voice therapy for muscle tension dysphonia.
        Laryngoscope. 2015; 125: 1420-1425
        • de Oliveira Lemos I
        • da Cunha Pereira G
        • Druck SantAnna G
        • et al.
        Effects of a voice therapy program for patients with muscle tension dysphonia.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2017; 69: 239-245
        • Jafari N
        • Salehi A
        • Izadi F
        • et al.
        Vocal function exercises for muscle tension dysphonia: auditory-perceptual evaluation and self-assessment rating.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 506.e525-506.e531
        • McCullough G
        • Pickett H
        • Balou S
        • et al.
        Treatment of laryngeal hyperfunction with flow phonation: a pilot study.
        J Laryngol Voice. 2012; 2: 64-69
        • Gartner-Schmidt J
        Flow phonation.
        in: Behrman A Haskell J Exercises for Voice Therapy. 2nd ed. Plural Publishing Inc, San Diego, CA2013
        • Watts CR
        • Diviney SS
        • Hamilton A
        • et al.
        The effect of stretch-and-flow voice therapy on measures of vocal function and handicap.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 191-199
        • Espinoza VM
        • Zanartu M
        • Van Stan JH
        • et al.
        Glottal aerodynamic measures in women with phonotraumatic and nonphonotraumatic vocal hyperfunction.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017; 60: 2159-2169
        • Gilman M
        • Petty B
        • Maira C
        • et al.
        Aerodynamic patterns in patients with voice disorders: a retrospective study.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 545-549
        • Carroll L
        • Rooney A
        • Ow TJ
        • et al.
        Pressure and flow comparisons across vocal pathologies.
        J Voice. 2018; 32: 95-100
        • Lewandowski A.
        • Gillespie A.
        • Kridgen S.
        • et al.
        Adult normative data for phonatory aerodynamics in connected speech.
        Laryngoscope. 2017; 128: 904-915
        • Dastolfo C
        • Gartner-Schmidt J
        • Yu L
        • et al.
        Aerodynamic outcomes of four common voice disorders: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 301-307
        • Gillespie A.I.
        • Dastolfo C.
        • Magid N.
        • et al.
        Acoustic analysis of four common voice diagnoses: moving toward disorder-specific assessment.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 582-588
        • Arffa RE
        • Krishna P
        • Gartner-Schmidt J
        • et al.
        Normative values for the voice handicap index-10.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 462-465
        • Littleton SW
        Impact of obesity on respiratory function.
        Respirology. 2012; 17: 43-49
        • Rubin D
        Bias Reduction Using Mahalanobis-Metric Matching. 2. International Biometric Society, 1980: 293-298
        • Gartner-Schmidt J.
        • Hirai R.
        • Dastolfo C.
        • et al.
        Phonatory aerodynamics in connected speech.
        Laryngoscope. 2015; 125: 2764-2771
        • Fairbanks G
        Voice and Articulation Drill Book.
        2nd ed. Harper and Row, New York1960
        • Hillman RE
        • Holmberg EB
        Objective assessment of vocal hyperfunction: an experimental framework and initial results.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1989; 32: 373-392
        • Hillman E
        • Holmberg EB
        • Perkell JS
        • et al.
        Objective assessment of vocal hyperfunction: an experimental framework and initial results.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1989; 32: 373-392
        • Aronson AE
        Clinical Voice Disorders: An Interdisciplinary Approach.
        3rd ed. Thieme, New York1990
        • Zraick RI
        • Smith-Olinde L
        • Shotts LL
        Adult normative data for the KayPENTAX Phonatory Aerodynamic System Model 6600.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 164-176
        • Gilman M
        • Petty B
        • Maira C
        • et al.
        Aerodynamic Patterns in Patients with Voice Disorders: A Retrospective Study. 31. Elsevier Inc, 2017: 545-549
        • Gillespie A.I.
        • Slivka W.
        • Atwood Jr., C.W.
        • et al.
        The effects of hyper- and hypocapnia on phonatory laryngeal airway resistance in women.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015; 58: 638-652
        • Iwarsson J
        • Thomasson M
        • Sundberg J
        Effects of lung volume on the glottal voice source.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 424-433

      Linked Article

      • Aerodynamic Measures in Muscle Tension Dysphonia
        Journal of Voice
        • Preview
          In the recent article from Belsky et al,1 which evaluates aerodynamic and acoustic measurements in healthy patients and patients with primary muscle tension dysphonia (MTD), the authors concluded that connected speech from patients diagnosed with MTD essentially reflect normal acoustic and aerodynamic values. We greatly appreciated the authors for their work and for their effort in including aerodynamic studies in the assessment of MTD, which we think is important for the understanding of this voice disorder.
        • Full-Text
        • PDF