Advertisement

Evaluation of the Electroglottographic Signal Variability in Organic and Functional Dysphonia

Published:October 12, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.09.005

      Summary

      Objectives

      To confirm the data reported in our previous studies on the analysis of the variability of the electroglottographic signal in the pathological voice; to evaluate possible differences in variability between organic and functional pathologies; to identify any distinctive/typical EGG patterns for these pathologies.

      Methods

      One hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled (36 euphonic and 89 pathological: 24 functional dysphonia, 21 bilateral vocal nodules, 23 unilateral polyps and 21 unilateral cysts). All subjects were studied with videolaryngostroboscopy, spectrographic analysis of voice and electroglottography (EGG).
      The EGG signal variability was then investigated using amplitude-speed combined analysis, by means of a proprietary software algorithm. Amplitude and Speed variation were expressed as a new parameter, the Variability Index (VI), calculated both for the whole EGG signal recorded (VI-tot) and in each phase of the glottic cycle (VI-Q, absolute value; VI-Q%, percentage value).

      Results

      In the comparison of VI values between pathological and normal groups, VI-tot and VI-Q2% (which corresponds to the final phase of vocal fold contact) were significantly greater in pathological subjects (P= 0.002). The comparison of VI values among subgroups of the various pathologies showed a difference for VI-tot (P< 0.0001) and VI-Q2% (P= 0.001); this difference was more marked in the cysts than in the functional dysphonia. The cut-off values of VI-tot and VI-Q2% were 0.191 and 18.17%, respectively (sensitivity and specificity 65.2% and 66.7% for VI-tot and 84.3% and 77.8% for VI-Q2%).

      Conclusions

      The variability of the EGG signal investigated through the combined analysis of the amplitude and the speed of vibration using a proprietary algorithm software has proved useful not only to distinguish the normal voice from the pathological voice, but also to characterize which phases are more altered in the various voice pathologies studied, both functional and organic. Furthermore, the analysis of the VI parameter allowed to propose cut-off values characterized by a good sensitivity and specificity to discriminate dysphonia from the euphonic voice. Larger groups of patients will be needed to confirm these results.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Herbst CT
        Electroglottography - an update.
        J Voice. 2020; 34: 503-526
        • Baer T
        • Löfqvist A
        • McGarr NS
        Laryngeal vibrations: a comparison between high-speed filming and glottographic techniques.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73: 1304-1308
        • Howard DM.
        Electroglottography/electrolaryngography.
        (Eds)in: Fried MP Ferlito A The Larynx. 3rd ed. Plural Press, San Diego2009: 227-243
        • Hampala V
        • Garcia M
        • Svec JG
        Relationship between the electroglottographic signal and vocal fold contact area.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 161-171
        • Fourcin A
        • Abberton E.
        First application of a new laryngograph.
        Med Biol Illus. 1971; 21: 172-182
        • Baken RJ
        • Orlikoff RF.
        Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice.
        2nd ed. Singular Publishing, Thompson Learning, 2000
        • Kitzing P
        Electroglottography.
        in: Ferlito A Diseases of the Larynx. Arnold, New York2000: 127-138
        • Baken RJ.
        Electroglottography.
        J Voice. 1992; 6: 98-110
        • Scherer RC
        • Druker DG
        • Titze IR
        Electroglottography and direct measurement of vocal fold contact area.
        (ed.)in: Fujimura O Vocal Fold Physiology, Vol.2: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions. Ed. Raven Press, New York1988: 279-290
        • Childers DG
        • Krishnamurty AK.
        A critical review of electroglottography.
        Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1985; 12: 131-161
        • Baken RJ
        • Orlikoff RF.
        Clinical Measurement of Speech and Voice.
        2nd ed. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego2000: 413-427
        • Fourcin A
        Precision stroboscopy, voice quality and electroglottography.
        in: Kent RD Ball MJ Voice Quality Measurement. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego2000
        • Kania R
        • Hartl D
        • Hans S
        • et al.
        Fundamental frequency histograms measured by electroglottography during speech: a pilot study for standardization.
        J Voice. 2006; 20: 18-24
        • Hirano M.
        Clinical Examination of Voice.
        Springer Verlag, New York1981
        • Hosokawa K
        • Yoshida M
        • Yoshii T
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of the computed analysis of electroglottographic signals in muscle tension dysphonia.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2012; 64: 145-150
        • Somanath K
        • Mau T.
        A measure of the auditory-perceptual quality of strain from electroglottographic analysis of continuous dysphonic speech: application to adductor spasmodic dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2016; 30 (e9-770.e21): 770
        • Hillman R
        • Montgomery W
        • Zeitels S
        Current diagnostics and office practice: appropriate use of objective measures of vocal function in the multidisciplinary management of voice disorders.
        Currn Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997; 5: 172-175
        • Carding P
        • Horsley I
        • Docherty G
        A study of the effectiveness of voice therapy in the treatment of 45 patients with nonorganic dysphonia.
        J Voice. 1999; 13: 72-104
        • Echternach M
        • Burk F
        • Burdumy M
        • et al.
        The influence of vocal fold mass lesions on the passaggio region of professional singers.
        Laryngoscope. 2017; 127: 1392-1401
        • Vaca M
        • Cobeta I
        • Mora E
        • et al.
        Clinical assessment of glottal insufficiency in age-related dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2017; 31 (e1–128. e5): 128
        • Saito M
        • Imagawa H
        • Sakakibara K
        • et al.
        High-speed digital imaging and electroglottography of tracheoesophageal phonation by Amatsu's method.
        Acta Otolaryngol. 2006; 126: 521-525
        • Fourcin A
        • Abberton E
        • Miller D
        Laryngograph: speech pattern element tools for therapy, training and assessment.
        Eur J Disord Commun. 1995; 30: 101-115
        • Howard DM.
        Variation of electrolaryngographically derived closed quotient for trained and untrained adult female singers.
        J Voice. 1995; 9: 163-172
        • Herbst CT
        • Howard DM
        • Schlömicher-Thier J
        Using electroglottographic real-time feed-back to control posterior glottal adduction during phonation.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 72-85
        • Childers DG
        • Hicks DM
        • Moore GP
        Electroglottography and vocal fold physiology.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1990; 33: 245-254
        • Colton R
        • Conture E.
        Problems and pitfalls of electroglottography.
        J Voice. 1990; 4: 10-24
        • Childers DG
        • Naik JM
        • Larar JN
        Electroglottography, speech, and ultra-high speed cinematography.
        in: Titze IR Scherer R Vocal Fold Physiology and Biophysics of Voice. 1983: 202-220 (Denver)
        • Berke G
        • Moore D
        • Hantke D
        • et al.
        Laryngeal modeling: theoretical, in vitro, in vivo.
        Laryngoscope. 1987; 97: 871-881
        • Herbst CT
        • Lohscheller J
        • Švec JG
        • et al.
        Glottal opening and closing events investigated by electroglottography and super-high-speed video recordings.
        J Exp Biol. 2014; 217: 955-963
        • Rothenberg M
        • Mahshie JJ
        Monitoring vocal fold abduction through vocal fold contact area.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1988; 31: 338-351
        • Macerata A
        • Nacci A
        • Manti M
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the electroglottographic signal variability by amplitude-speed combined analysis.
        Biomed Signal Process Control. 2017; 37: 61-68
        • Nacci A
        • Romeo SO
        • Cavaliere MD
        • et al.
        Comparison of electroglottographic variability index in euphonic and pathological voice.
        Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2019; 39: 381-388
        • Titze IR.
        Workshop on Acoustic Voice Analysis: Summary Statement.
        National Center for Voice and Speech, Iowa City1995
        • Sprecher A
        • Olszewski A
        • Jiang JJ
        Updating signal typing in voice: addition of type 4 signals.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 127: 3710-3716
        • Chakravarti IM
        • Laha RG
        • Roy J
        Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics. Volume I. John Wiley and Sons, 1967
      1. Berg R, Gall V.Voice cascadation and electroglottography-basics and practise. In: Dejonckere PH, Peters HFM (Eds), Communication and Its Disorders: A Science in Progress, Vol. 1, Proceedings of the 24th Congress International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. (International Association of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Groningen, The Netherlands), pp. 5-8, 1999b.