Advertisement

Immediate Effects of Straw Phonation in Water Exercises on Parameters of Vocal Loading in Carnatic Classical Singers

  • Usha Devadas
    Affiliations
    Department of Speech and Hearing, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • Devika Vinod
    Affiliations
    Department of Speech-Language Sciences, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Manasagangothri, Mysore, India
    Search for articles by this author
  • Santosh Maruthy
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Santosh Maruthy, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Naimisham Campus, Manasagangothri, Mysore, Karnataka, India 570006.
    Affiliations
    Department of Speech-Language Sciences, All India Institute of Speech and Hearing, Manasagangothri, Mysore, India
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 04, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.11.007

      Summary

      Objective

      The present study aimed to investigate the effect of vocal loading and the immediate effects of straw phonation in water exercises on parameters of vocal loading in Carnatic classical singers.

      Study Design

      A within-subject pretest-posttest design.

      Methods

      Twelve healthy Carnatic classical singers participated in the vocal loading experiment for 2 days, referred to as no-treatment and treatment conditions. The vocal loading task consisted of 1 hour of continuous singing in the presence of background noise. For the treatment condition, the participants followed a 10-minute straw phonation in water exercises before the vocal loading task. Acoustic, electroglottographic, and self-rated perceptual voice measures were recorded before and after the vocal loading task on both days.

      Results

      Pretest and posttest comparison of various outcome measures during no-treatment day suggested a significant increase in shimmer percent, decrease in maximum phonation duration of vowel /a/, and increase in perceived phonatory effort, perceived vocal effort, and Evaluation of Ability to Sing Easily scores. Pretest and posttest comparisons during treatment day showed a significant increase in Mean F0, Highest F0, and Lowest F0, perceived phonatory effort, and perceived vocal effort scores. However, changes in Mean F0, Highest F0, and Lowest F0 measures were small in the posttest condition compared to pretest.

      Conclusion

      The present results suggest that vocal loading did induce changes in Carnatic classical singers' voices. However, there is no substantial evidence that straw phonation is effective in reducing the vocal loading in Carnatic classical singers. Further studies are required to corroborate the current findings.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Zimmer V
        • Cielo CA
        • Ferreira FM
        Vocal behavior of popular singers/Comportamento vocal de cantores populares.
        Revista CEFAC Atualizacao Cientifica Fonoaudiologia Educacao. 2012; 14: 298-308
        • Menon R
        The Penguin Dictionary of Indian Music.
        Penguin Publication, India1995
        • Shankar V
        The Art and Science of Carnatic Music.
        Parampara, India, Chennai1999
        • Durga SAK
        Voice Culture with Special Reference to South Indian Music.
        Indian MusicologicalSociety, Baroda, India1997
        • Scherer RC
        • Radhakrishnan N
        • Boominathan P
        • et al.
        Rate of change of Fo in performance singing.
        J Acoustic Soc Am. 2008; 123: 3379
        • Chandra A
        Relationship between Fundamental Frequency of Voice and ‘a:dha:ra shruthi’ in Carnatic Vocal Music [Master's thesis].
        University of Mysore, India, Mysore2001
        • Boominathan P
        • Scherer RC
        • Shrivastav R
        • et al.
        Carnatic singing (South Indian classical): Pitch matching, practice F0range and life style.
        in: Poster Presentation at the 35th Symposium: Care of the Professional Voice, Philadelphia, USA2006
        • Devadas U
        • Kumar PC
        • Maruthy S
        Prevalence of and risk factors for self-reported voice problems among Carnatic singers.
        J Voice. 2020; 34: 303.e1-303.e15https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.013
        • Miller MK
        • Verdolini K
        Frequency and risk factors for voice problems in teachers of singing and control subjects.
        J Voice. 1995; 9: 348-362https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80197-3
        • Phyland DJ
        • Oates J
        • Greenwood KM
        Self-reported voice problems among three groups of professional singers.
        J Voice. 1999; 13: 602-611https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(99)80014-9
        • Zeitels SM
        The art and craft of phonomicrosurgery in Grammy award-winning elite performers.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019; 128: 7S-24Shttps://doi.org/10.1177/0003489418810697
        • Bradshaw N
        • Coopeer AL
        Medical privacy and the professional singer: injury stigma, disclosure, and professional ramifications on Broadway.
        J Singing. 2018; 74: 513-520
        • Pizzorni N
        • Schindler A
        • Sozzi M
        • et al.
        The vocal score profile in Verdi's characters.
        J Voice. 2019; 33: 805.e13-805.e20https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.03.013
        • Pacheco C
        • Behlau M
        Immediate impact of vocal demand on musical theater singers in Brazil.
        J Voice. 2019; 33: 804.e13-804.e22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.04.013
        • Martin E
        • Battaglini C
        Health status of live theater actors: a systematic literature review.
        Med Probl Perform Art. 2019; 34: 108-117https://doi.org/10.21091/mppa.2019.2010
        • Pestana PM
        • Vaz-Freitas S
        • Manso MC
        Prevalence, characterization, and impact of voice disorders in Fado singers.
        J Voice. 2020; 34: 380-386https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.10.015
        • Weekly EM
        • Carroll LM
        • Korovin GS
        • et al.
        A vocal health survey among amateur and professional voice users.
        J Voice. 2018; 32: 474-478https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.07.012
        • Boominathan P
        • Nagarajan R
        • Krishnan S
        • et al.
        A profile of the vocal and non-vocal habits of Carnatic singers.
        Asia Pacific J Speech Lang Hear. 2004; 18: 77-88
        • Vilkman E
        Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2004; 56: 220-253https://doi.org/10.1159/000078344
        • Hunter EJ
        • Titze IR
        Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009; 118: 449-460https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940911800608
        • Remacle A
        • Morsomme D
        • Berrué E
        • et al.
        Vocal impact of a prolonged reading task in dysphonic versus normophonic female teachers.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 820.e1-820.e8213https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.06.002
        • Phyland D
        • Miles A
        Occupational voice is a work in progress: active risk management, habilitation and rehabilitation.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 27: 439-447https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000584
        • Stemple JC
        • Stanley J
        • Lee L
        Objective measures of voice production in normal subjects following prolonged voice use.
        J Voice. 1995; 9: 127-133https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80245-0
        • Solomon NP
        • DiMattia MS
        Effects of a vocally fatiguing task and systemic hydration on phonation threshold pressure.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 341-362https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80080-6
        • Enflo L
        • Sundberg J
        • McAllister A
        Collision and phonation threshold pressures before and after loud, prolonged vocalization in trained and untrained voices.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 527-530https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.03.008
        • Yiu EM
        • Wang G
        • Lo AC
        • et al.
        Quantitative high-speed laryngoscopic analysis of vocal fold vibration in fatigued voice of young karaoke singers.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 753-761https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.6.010
        • Titze IR
        • Hunter EJ
        Comparison of vocal vibration-dose measures for potential-damage risk criteria.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015; 58: 1425-1439https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-13-0128
        • Colton RH
        • Casper JK
        Understanding Voice Disorders: A physiology Perspective for Diagnosis and Treatment.
        Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore1996 (259-8)
        • Titze I.
        How to use the flow-resistant straws.
        J Singing. 2002; 58: 429-430
        • Nix J
        Voice research and technology: semi-occluded vocal tract postures and their application in the singing voice studio.
        J Singing. 2008; 64: 339-342
        • Portillo MP
        • Rojas S
        • Guzman M
        • et al.
        Comparison of effects produced by physiological versus traditional vocal warm-up in contemporary commercial music singers.
        J Voice. 2018; 32: 200-208https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.03.022
        • Titze IR
        Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: rationale and scientific underpinnings.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49: 448-459https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/035)
        • Mendes AP
        • Rothman HB
        • Sapienza C
        • et al.
        Effects of vocal training on the acoustic parameters of the singing voice.
        J Voice. 2003; 17: 529-543https://doi.org/10.1067/s0892-1997(03)00083-3
        • Amir O
        • Amir N
        • Michaeli O
        Evaluating the influence of warm-up on singing voice quality using acoustic measures.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 252‐260https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.008
        • Laukkanen AM
        • Titze IR
        • Hoffman H
        • et al.
        Effects of a semioccluded vocal tract on laryngeal muscle activity and glottal adduction in a single female subject.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008; 60: 298‐311https://doi.org/10.1159/000170080
        • Laukkanen AM
        • Horáček J
        • Havlík R
        Case-study magnetic resonance imaging and acoustic investigation of the effects of vocal warm-up on two voice professionals.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2012; 37: 75‐82https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2012.660502
        • Verdolini K
        • Druker DG
        • Palmer PM
        • et al.
        Laryngeal adduction in resonant voice.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 315‐327https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(98)80021-0
        • Story BH
        • Laukkanen AM
        • Titze IR
        Acoustic impedance of an artificially lengthened and constricted vocal tract.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 455‐469https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(00)80003-x
        • Smith SL
        • Titze IR.
        Characterization of flow-resistant tubes used for semi-occluded vocal tract voice training and therapy.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 113.e1-113.e8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.04.001
        • Hirano M
        Clinical Examination of Voice.
        Springer Verlag, New York1981: 81-84
        • Meerschman I
        • Van Lierde K
        • Ketels J
        • et al.
        Effect of three semi-occluded vocal tract therapy programmes on the phonation of patients with dysphonia: lip trill, water-resistance therapy and straw phonation.
        Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019; 54: 50‐61https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12431
        • Haynes WO
        • Pindzola RH
        Diagnosis and Evaluation in Speech Pathology.
        5th ed. Allyn and Bacon, Boston: MA1998
        • Finger LS
        • Cielo CA
        • Schwarz K
        Acoustic vocal measures in women without voice complaints and with normal larynxes.
        BrazJ Otorhinolaryngol. 2009; 75: 432-440
        • Gelfer MP
        • Andrews ML
        • Schmidt CP
        Effects of prolonged loud reading on selected measures of vocal function in trained and untrained singers.
        J Voice. 1991; 5: 158-167
        • Rantala L
        • Vilkman E.
        Relationship between subjective voice complaints and acoustic parameters in female teachers' voices.
        J Voice. 1999; 13: 484-495
        • Stemple JC
        Clinical Voice Pathology: Theory and Management.
        3rd ed. Singular Publishing Group, San Diego1995
        • Vilkman E
        • Lauri ER
        • Alku P
        • et al.
        Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms.
        J Voice. 1999; 13: 303-312
        • Rantala L
        • Vilkman E
        • Bloigu R
        Voice changes during work: subjective complaints and objective measurements for female primary and secondary schoolteachers.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 344-355
        • Södersten M
        • Granqvist S
        • Hammarberg B
        • et al.
        Vocal behavior and vocal loading factors for preschool teachers at work studied with binaural DAT recordings.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 356-371
        • Schneider B
        • Enne R
        • Cecon M
        • et al.
        Effects of vocal constitution and autonomic stress-related reactivity on vocal endurance in female student teachers.
        J Voice. 2006; 20: 242-250
        • Maryn Y
        • Weenink D
        Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 35‐43https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.06.015
        • Heman-Ackah YD
        • Michael DD
        • Goding GS
        The Relationship between cepstral peak prominence and selected parameters of dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 20-27
        • Ferrer-Riesgo C
        • De Bodt MS
        • Maryn Y
        • et al.
        Properties of the cepstral peak prominence and its usefulness in vocal quality measurements.
        Maveba. 2007; 2007: 93-96
        • Maryn Y
        • Weenink D
        Objective dysphonia measures in the program Praat: smoothed cepstral peak prominence and acoustic voice quality index.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 35-43
        • Van Riper C
        Speech Correction: Principles and Methods.
        Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs1954
        • Jilek C
        • Marienhagen J
        • Hacki T
        Vocal stability in functional dysphonic versus healthy voices at different times of voice loading.
        J Voice. 2004; 18 (15567046): 443-453https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.01.002
        • Sundarrajan A
        • Fujiki RB
        • Loerch SE
        • et al.
        Vocal loading and environmental humidity effects in older adults.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 707‐713https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.02.002
        • Phyland DJ
        • Pallant JF
        • Benninger MS
        • et al.
        Development and preliminary validation of the EASE: a tool to measure perceived singing voice function.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 454‐462https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.01.019
        • Cohen J.
        Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        2nd ed. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ1988
        • Dargin TC
        • Searl J
        Semi-occluded vocal tract exercises: aerodynamic and electroglottographic measurements in singers.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 155‐164https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.05.009
        • Kelchner LN
        • Lee L
        • Stemple JC
        Laryngeal function and vocal fatigue after prolonged reading in individuals with unilateral vocal fold paralysis.
        J Voice. 2003; 17: 513‐528https://doi.org/10.1067/s0892-1997(03)00067-5
        • Chang A
        • Karnell MP.
        Perceived phonatory effort and phonation threshold pressure across a prolonged voice loading task: a study of vocal fatigue.
        J Voice. 2004; 18: 454‐466https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.01.004
        • Södersten M
        • Ternström S
        • Bohman M
        Loud speech in realistic environmental noise: phonetogram data, perceptual voice quality, subjective ratings, and gender differences in healthy speakers.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 29‐46https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.05.002
        • Gorham-Rowan M
        • Berndt A
        • Carter M
        • et al.
        The effect of a vocal loading task on vocal function before and after 24 hours of thickened liquid use.
        J. Speech Pathol. Ther. 2016; 1: 1-5
        • Fujiki RB
        • Sivasankar MP.
        A review of vocal loading tasks in the voice literature.
        J Voice. 2017; 31 (388.e33‐388.e39.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.09.019)
        • Whitling S
        • Rydell R
        • Åhlander VL
        Design of a clinical vocal loading test with long-time measurement of voice.
        J Voice. 2015; 29 (261.e13‐261.e2.61E27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.07.012)
        • Phyland DJ
        • Pallant JF
        • Thibeault SL
        • et al.
        Measuring vocal function in professional music theater singers: construct validation of the Evaluation of the Ability to Sing Easily (EASE).
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2014; 66: 100-108https://doi.org/10.1159/000366202
        • De Bodt MS
        • Wuyts FL
        • Van de Heyning PH
        • et al.
        Predicting vocal outcome by means of a vocal endurance test: a 5-year follow-up study in female teachers.
        Laryngoscope. 1998; 108: 1363‐1367https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199809000-00020
        • Buekers R
        Are voice endurance tests able to assess vocal fatigue?.
        Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998; 23: 533‐538https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2273.1998.2360533.x
        • Erickson-Levendoski E
        • Sivasankar M.
        Investigating the effects of caffeine on phonation.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: e215-e219
        • Solomon NP
        • Ramanathan P
        • Makashay MJ
        Phonation threshold pressure across the pitch range: preliminary test of a model.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 541-550https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.04.002