Advertisement

The Effects of Collegiate Sports Coaching on the Male Voice: Pilot Data

  • Irena Vincent
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author: Irena Vincent, State University of New York College at Cortland, Communication Disorders and Sciences Department, Professional Studies Building, Room 2203, Cortland, NY 13045.
    Affiliations
    State University of New York College at Cortland, Communication Disorders and Sciences Department, Cortland, NY
    Search for articles by this author
  • Mary J. Emm
    Affiliations
    State University of New York College at Cortland, Communication Disorders and Sciences Department, Cortland, NY
    Search for articles by this author
Published:December 27, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.11.021

      Abstract

      Purpose

      This research gathered pilot data on the effects of a typical collegiate athletic season on the male coach's voice.

      Materials and methods

      Ten male coaches and ten age- and sex-matched controls participated. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed to assess group differences in: 1) written self-reports obtained during one session, 2) acoustic and aerodynamic variables obtained during regular season and during off-season for the coaches and only once for the controls, and 3) auditory-perceptual data provided by three speech-language pathologists using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice during one listening session. Data pertaining to the coaches’ regular season, to the coaches’ off-season, and to the control participants were designated as in-season, off-season, and control, respectively.

      Results

      Significant self-reported findings included more phonotraumatic behaviors in the coaches than in the controls and higher in-season than off-season and control vocal demand. The coaches’ history of voice problems was unrelated and the controls’ was related to respiratory illness and addressing a large audience. A significant acoustic finding was lower off-season than control low fundamental frequency. Finally, trained listeners perceived control loudness as more aberrant than off-season loudness and they noted vocal fry twice as many times in in-season and off-season than in control voices.

      Conclusions

      This study exposed traces of adverse voice reactions to coaching and confirmed that coaches harbor a job-based proclivity to voice overuse. Self-reported measures appeared to be the least and aerodynamic the most immune to phonatory exertion that pervades daily coaching tasks. Future studies are warranted to further delineate how athletic coaching interferes with voice production.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Titze IR
        • Lemke J
        • Montequin D
        Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: A preliminary report.
        J Voice. 1997; 11: 254-259https://doi.org/10.1016/s0892-1997(97)80002-1
        • Vilkman E
        Voice problems at work: A challenge for occupational safety and health arrangement.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2000; 52: 120-125https://doi.org/10.1159/000021519
        • Williams NR
        Occupational groups at risk of voice disorders: A review of the literature.
        Occup Med (Chic Ill). 2003; 53: 456-460https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqg113
        • Mattiske JA
        • Oates JM
        • Greenwood KM
        Vocal problems among teachers: A review of prevalence, causes, prevention, and treatment.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 489-499https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80058-1
        • Roy N
        • Merrill RM
        • Thibeault S
        • Gray SD
        • Smith EM
        Voice disorders in teachers and the general population: Effects on work performance, attendance, and future career choices.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47: 542-551https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/042
        • Smith E
        • Gray SD
        • Dove H
        • Kirchner L
        • Heras H
        Frequency and effects of teachers’ voice problems.
        J Voice. 1997; 11: 81-87https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(97)80027-6
        • Van Houtte E
        • Claeys S
        • Wuyts F
        • Van Lierde K
        Voice disorders in teachers: Occupational risk factors and psycho-emotional factors.
        Logop Phoniatr Vocology. 2012; 37: 107-116https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2012.660499
        • Hočevar-Boltežar I
        Prevalence and risk factors for voice problems in priests.
        Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009; 121: 276-281https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-009-1163-1
        • Hagelberg AM
        • Simberg S
        Prevalence of voice problems in priests and some risk factors contributing to them.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 389.e11-389.e18https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.08.015
        • Middleton RL
        • Hinton VA
        A preliminary investigation of the vocal behaviors and characteristics of female pastors.
        J Voice. 2009; 23: 594-602https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.01.002
        • Jones K
        • Sigmon J
        • Hock L
        • Nelson E
        • Sullivan M
        • Ogren F
        Prevalence and risk factors for voice problems among telemarketers.
        Arch Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2002; 128: 571-577https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.128.5.571
        • Lehto L
        • Alku P
        • Bäckström T
        • Vilkman E
        Voice symptoms of call-centre customer service advisers experienced during a work-day and effects of a short vocal training course.
        Logop Phoniatr Vocology. 2005; 30: 14-27https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430510006659
        • Rechenberg L
        • de Goulart BNG
        • Roithmann R
        Impact of call center work in subjective voice symptoms and complaints - An analytic study.
        J Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2011; 23: 301-307https://doi.org/10.1590/S2179-64912011000400003
        • Smith E
        • Lemke J
        • Taylor M
        • Kirchner HL
        • Hoffman H
        Frequency of voice problems among teachers and other occupations.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 480-488https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80057-X
        • Smith E
        • Kirchner HL
        • Taylor M
        • Hoffman H
        • Lemke JH
        Voice problems among teachers: Differences by gender and teaching characteristics.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 328-334https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80022-2
        • Dallaston K
        • Rumbach AF
        Vocal performance of group fitness instructors before and after instruction: Changes in acoustic measures and self-ratings.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 127.e1-127.e8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.02.007
        • Davis S
        A preliminary study on the need for structured vocal seminars for fitness instructors to prevent voice disorders and improve overall voice use during instruction.
        Perspect ASHA Spec Interes Groups. 2020; 5: 435-438https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_persp-19-00018
        • Heidel SE
        • Torgerson JK
        Vocal problems among aerobic instructors and aerobic participants.
        J Commun Disord. 1993; 26: 179-191https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(93)90007-W
        • Long J
        • Williford HN
        • Olson MS
        • Wolfe V
        Voice problems and risk factors among aerobics instructors.
        J Voice. 1998; 12: 197-207https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80039-8
        • Newman C
        • Kersner M
        Voice problems of aerobics instructors: Implications for preventative training.
        Logop Phoniatr Vocology. 1998; 23: 177-180https://doi.org/10.1080/140154398434086
        • Rumbach AF
        Vocal problems of group fitness instructors: Prevalence of self-reported sensory and auditory-perceptual voice symptoms and the need for preventative education and training.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 524.e11-524.e21https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.01.016
        • Rumbach AF
        Voice problems of group fitness instructors: Diagnosis, treatment, perceived and experienced attitudes and expectations of the industry.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 786.e1-786.e9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.03.012
        • Rumbach A
        • Khan A
        • Brown M
        • Eloff K
        • Poetschke A
        Voice problems in the fitness industry: Factors associated with chronic hoarseness.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015; 17: 441-450https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.987820
        • Wolfe V
        • Long J
        • Youngblood HC
        • Williford H
        • Olson MS
        Vocal parameters of aerobic instructors with and without voice problems.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 52-60https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(02)00072-3
        • Buckley KL
        • O'Halloran PD
        • Oates JM
        Occupational vocal health of elite sports coaches: An exploratory pilot study of football coaches.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 476-483https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.09.017
        • Fellman D
        • Simberg S
        Prevalence and risk factors for voice problems among soccer coaches.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 121.e9-121.e15https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.02.003
        • Gorham-Rowan M
        • Iwahashi M
        • Quattlebaum L
        • Rivers D
        Voice wear and tear: A pilot study of voice care for soccer coaches.
        Appl Res Coach Athlet Ann. 2004; 19: 35-51
        • O'Neill J
        • McMenamin R
        Voice use in professional soccer management.
        Logop Phoniatr Vocology. 2014; 39: 169-178https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2013.825008
        • U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Coaches and Scouts
        Occupational outlook handbook, 2018.
        2018 (http://www.bls.gov/ooh/entertainment-and-sports/coaches-and-scouts.htm. Accessed 27 August 2020)
        • Boone DR
        • McFarlane SC
        • Von Berg SL
        • Zraick RI
        Management and therapy for special populations.
        in: Dragin SD The Voice and Voice Therapy. 8th ed. Allyn & Bacon, 2010: 247-275
        • Coelho AC
        • Medved DM
        • Brasolotto AG
        Hearing loss and the voice.
        in: Bahmad Jr., F Update on Hearing Loss. InTech, 2015: 103-128
        • Fairbanks G
        The Rainbow Passage.
        Voice and Articulation Drillbook. 2nd ed. Harper & Row, New York, NY1960 (1960)
        • Ferrand CT
        Voice Disorders: Scope of Theory and Practice.
        Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ2012
        • Cohen J
        Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
        2nd ed. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ1988
        • Koo TK
        • Li MY
        A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
        • Hunter EJ
        • Tanner K
        • Smith ME
        Gender differences affecting vocal health of women in vocally demanding careers.
        Logop Phoniatr Vocology. 2011; 36: 128-136https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2011.587447
        • Higgins MB
        • Saxman JH
        A comparison of selected phonatory behaviors of healthy aged and young adults.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1991; 34: 1000-1010https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3405.1000
        • Torre P
        • Barlow JA
        Age-related changes in acoustic characteristics of adult speech.
        J Commun Disord. 2009; 42: 324-333https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.03.001
        • Wilcox KA
        • Horii Y
        Age and changes in vocal jitter.
        Journals Gerontol. 1980; 35: 194-198https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/35.2.194
        • Xue SA
        • Deliyski D
        Effects of aging on selected acoustic voice parameters: Preliminary normative data and educational implications.
        Educ Gerontol. 2001; 27: 159-168https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270151075561
        • Goy H
        • Fernandes DN
        • Pichora-Fuller MK
        • Van Lieshout P
        Normative voice data for younger and older adults.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 545-555https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.03.002
        • Ramig LA
        • Ringel RL
        Effects of physiological aging on selected acoustic characteristics of voice.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1983; 26: 22-30https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2601.22
        • Golub JS
        • Chen PH
        • Otto KJ
        • Hapner E
        • Johns MM
        Prevalence of perceived dysphonia in a geriatric population.
        J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54: 1736-1739https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00915.x
        • Turley R
        • Cohen S
        Impact of voice and swallowing problems in the elderly.
        Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2009; 140: 33-36https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.10.010
        • Ptacek PH
        • Sander EK
        • Maloney WH
        • Jackson CCR
        Phonatory and related changes with advanced age.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1966; 9: 353-360https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0903.353
        • Ma EPM
        • Love AL
        Electroglottographic evaluation of age and gender effects during sustained phonation and connected speech.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 146-152https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.08.004
        • Nishio M
        • Niimi S
        Changes in speaking fundamental frequency characteristics with aging.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008; 60: 120-127https://doi.org/10.1159/000118510
        • Maslan J
        • Leng X
        • Rees C
        • Blalock D
        • Butler SG
        Maximum phonation time in healthy older adults.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 709-713https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.10.002
        • Kempster GB
        • Gerratt BR
        • Abbott KV
        • Barkmeier-Kraemer J
        • Hillman RE
        Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: Development of a standardized clinical protocol.
        Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2009; 18: 124-132https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017
        • Mehta DD
        • Hillman RE
        Voice assessment: Updates on perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, and endoscopic imaging methods.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008; 16: 211-215https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282fe96ce
        • Helou LB
        • Solomon NP
        • Henry LR
        • Coppit GL
        • Howard RS
        • Stojadinovic A
        The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
        Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2010; 19: 248-258https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0012
        • Park Y
        • Stepp CE
        Test-retest reliability of relative fundamental frequency and conventional acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual measures in individuals with healthy voices.
        J Speech, Lang Hear Res. 2019; 62: 1707-1718https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-18-0507
        • Zraick RI
        • Kempster GB
        • Connor NP
        • Klaben BK
        • Bursac Z
        • Thrush CR
        • Glaze LE
        Establishing validity of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V).
        Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2011; 20: 14-22https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105
        • Nemr K
        • Simões-Zenari M
        • Cordeiro GF
        • Tsuji D
        • Ogawa AI
        • Ubrig MT
        • Menezes MHM
        GRBAS and CAPE-V scales: High reliability and consensus when applied at different times.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 812e17-812e22https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.005
        • Youssef S
        • Bayan S
        • Ekbom D
        • Lohse C
        • Zimmerman T
        • Pittelko R
        • Orbelo DM
        Breathiness and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) in patients undergoing medialization laryngoplasty with or without arytenoid adduction.
        J Voice. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.08.016
        • Hollien H
        • Moore P
        • Wendahl RW
        • Michel JF
        On the nature of vocal fry.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1966; 9: 245-247https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.0902.245
        • Abdelli-Beruh NB
        • Wolk L
        • Slavin D
        Prevalence of vocal fry in young adult male American English speakers.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 185-190https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.011
        • Wolk L
        • Abdelli-Beruh NB
        • Slavin D
        Habitual use of vocal fry in young adult female speakers.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: e111-e116https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.04.007
        • Dallaston K
        • Docherty G
        The quantitative prevalence of creaky voice (vocal fry) in varieties of English: A systematic review of the literature.
        PLoS One. 2020; 15e0229960https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229960
        • Blomgren M
        • Chen Y
        • Ng ML
        • Gilbert HR
        Acoustic, aerodynamic, physiologic, and perceptual properties of modal and vocal fry registers.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1998; 103: 2649-2658https://doi.org/10.1121/1.422785
        • Gottliebson RO
        • Lee L
        • Weinrich B
        • Sanders J
        Voice problems of future speech-language pathologists.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 699-704https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.07.003
        • National Collegiate Athletic Association
        NCAA demographics database [Data visualization dashboard].
        2020 (http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/ncaa-demographics-database. Accessed July 14, 2020)