Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 37, ISSUE 3, P410-414, May 2023

Download started.

Ok

Barriers to Voice Therapy in Dysphonic Children

Published:February 23, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.01.008

      Summary

      Background

      The most common etiologies of dysphonia in the pediatric population are vocal fold nodules and muscle tension dysphonia. Vocal therapy is the first line treatment for these disorders in children. Despite this, not all children undergo therapy. The goal of this study is to examine how factors such as patient demographics and parental perceptions differ between children that choose to undergo or not to undergo voice therapy.

      Methods

      A retrospective review was conducted of all pediatric patients seen at a tertiary voice clinic between January 2014 and December 2017. Patients were included if diagnosed with vocal fold nodules and/or muscle tension dysphonia. Patients were divided into groups of children that received voice therapy at our institution and those that did not. Data include demographics, Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) scores and pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI) scores. Distance to therapy site was approximated using patient zip codes.

      Results

      Three hundred and forty-six children were included, 224 (65%) boys and 122 (35%) girls. In the 2 years following initial diagnosis, 74 (21%) children participated in voice therapy at our institution. Patients who underwent voice therapy were older than those who did not (mean age: 9.1 [SD 3.5] vs 7.6 [SD 3.8] years; P = 0.004). Patients who received voice therapy were more likely to live closer to the therapy site (mean distance: 15.5 [SD 13.0] vs 24.3 [SD 23.9] miles; P< 0.001). Likelihood of receiving voice therapy did not differ by gender or health insurance status (private vs public). Patients who underwent voice therapy had significantly greater CAPE-V Overall Severity scores than those who did not (mean score: 44.6 [SD 19.4] vs 37.4 [SD 18.0]; P = 0.003). Higher CAPE-V Strain scores were associated with increased likelihood of voice therapy. pVHI scores did not differ between the two groups.

      Conclusion

      Older age, shorter distance to therapy site, and increased CAPE-V Overall Severity and Strain scores were associated with higher likelihood of receiving voice therapy. Gender, insurance status, and pVHI scores did not affect likelihood of receiving voice therapy. Patients may primarily consider ease of access and necessity of treatment when considering voice therapy.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations:

      MTD (Muscle Tension Dysphonia), CAPE-V (Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice), pVHI (Pediatric Voice Handicap Index)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Carding PN
        • Roulstone S
        • Northstone K
        • ALSPAC Study Team
        The prevalence of childhood dysphonia: a cross-sectional study.
        J Voice. 2006; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.07.004
        • Martins RHG
        • Hidalgo Ribeiro CB
        • Fernandes de Mello BMZ
        • et al.
        Dysphonia in children.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 674.e17-674.e20https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.03.004
        • Akif Kiliç M
        • Okur E
        • Yildirim I
        • et al.
        The prevalence of vocal fold nodules in school age children.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004; 68: 409-412https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.11.005
        • Ongkasuwan J
        • Friedman EM
        Is voice therapy effective in the management of vocal fold nodules in children?.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 2930-2931https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23830
        • Kempster GB
        • Gerratt BR
        • Verdolini Abbott K
        • et al.
        Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.
        Am J speech-language Pathol. 2009; 18: 124-132https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017
        • Zur KB
        • Cotton S
        • Kelchner L
        • et al.
        Pediatric Voice Handicap Index (pVHI): a new tool for evaluating pediatric dysphonia.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.09.004
        • Tezcaner CZ
        • Ozgursoy SK
        • Sati I
        • et al.
        Changes after voice therapy in objective and subjective voice measurements of pediatric patients with vocal nodules.
        Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2009; 266: 1923-1927https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-009-1008-6
        • Mudd P
        • Noelke C
        Vocal fold nodules in children.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018; 26: 426-430https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000496
        • Trani M
        • Ghidini A
        • Bergamini G
        • et al.
        Voice therapy in pediatric functional dysphonia: a prospective study.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 71: 379-384https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2006.11.002
        • Niedzielska G
        Acoustic analysis in the diagnosis of voice disorders in children.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2001; 57: 189-193https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(00)00411-0
        • Hartnick C
        • Ballif C
        • De Guzman V
        • et al.
        Indirect vs direct voice therapy for children with vocal nodules.
        JAMA Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2018; 144: 156https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2618
        • Johnson K
        Comparison of the pediatric voice handicap index with perceptual voice analysis in pediatric patients with vocal fold lesions.
        Arch Otolaryngol Neck Surg. 2011; 137: 1258https://doi.org/10.1001/archoto.2011.193
        • Brehm SB
        • Weinrich B
        • Kelchner L
        A practical discussion of current approaches to providing voice therapy to children with dysphonia.
        Perspect ASHA Spec Interes Groups. 2018; 3: 40-46https://doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG3.40
        • Doarn CR
        • Zacharias S
        • Keck CS
        • et al.
        Design and implementation of an interactive website for pediatric voice therapy—the concept of in-between care: a telehealth model.
        Telemed e-Health. 2019; 25: 415-422https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0108
        • Grillo EU
        An online telepractice model for the prevention of voice disorders in vocally healthy student teachers evaluated by a smartphone application.
        Perspect ASHA Spec Interes Groups. 2017; 2: 63-78https://doi.org/10.1044/persp2.SIG3.63
        • Helou LB
        • Solomon NP
        • Henry LR
        • et al.
        The role of listener experience on Consensus Auditory-perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) ratings of postthyroidectomy voice.
        Am J speech-language Pathol. 2010; 19: 248-258
        • Zraick RI
        • Kempster GB
        • Connor NP
        • et al.
        Establishing Validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
        Am J speech-language Pathol. 2011; 20: 14-22
        • Prendes BL
        • Yung KC
        • Likhterov I
        • et al.
        Long-term effects of injection laryngoplasty with a temporary agent on voice quality and vocal fold position.
        Laryngoscope. 2012; 122: 2227-2233