Research Article| Volume 37, ISSUE 3, P466.e17-466.e34, May 2023

Download started.


Effectiveness of Intensive Voice Therapy Versus Weekly Therapy for Muscle Tension Dysphonia: A Noninferiority Randomised Controlled Trial With Nested Focus Group



      To investigate the noninferiority of intensive voice therapy and compare its effects with weekly voice therapy on multidimensional outcomes of voice and well-being, satisfaction, and attendance in people with muscle tension dysphonia (MTD). The study further aimed to explore clinician's perceptions of barriers and enablers to implementation of intensive therapy.

      Study Design

      Noninferiority randomised controlled trial with nested focus group.


      Twenty adults with MTD were randomised to receive either weekly voice therapy (1 hour per week for 8 weeks) or intensive voice therapy (1 hour, 4 days per week for 2 weeks). Participants were assessed by a blinded assessor twice before treatment, once post treatment and once at 4 weeks follow up on the primary outcome measure VHI and a range of secondary auditory-perceptual, acoustic, and patient (i.e., VoiSS, satisfaction) and clinician reported outcome measures (i.e., AusTOMs, attendance rates). Five Speech Language Pathologists also participated in a focus group to explore barriers and enablers to implementing intensive therapy, with questions and analyses guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework.


      While noninferiority for the primary outcome measure VHI was not confirmed, secondary outcome measures revealed comparable within group clinically important improvements for VoiSS and the AusTOMs, as well as selected acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures for both groups. A trend of more improvements being maintained in the intensive group was identified. Comparably high satisfaction and attendance was also found between groups. Clinicians reported more enablers than barriers to providing intensive therapy which included beliefs that it led to greater progression and consolidation of patient learning, was supported by the local context and was associated with positive emotions. Barriers related to difficulties with booking and scheduling and the belief that intensive therapy was not for all patients.


      While the current study was likely underpowered to establish non-inferiority of intensive therapy, secondary outcomes suggested that intensive therapy may produce comparable benefits to voice, wellbeing, satisfaction and attendance compared to weekly therapy and may be a viable therapy option for individuals with MTD. When implementing intensive therapy, clinicians should consider patient's preferences and availability, as well as systems which allow for flexible booking and therapy provision for patients. Clear recommendations for future research including the use of a larger sample and telehealth are also provided.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Dworkin-Valenti J.P.
        • Stachler R.J.
        • Amjad E.H.
        Pathophysiologic Perspectives on Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
        Archives of Otolaryngology and Rhinology. 2018; 4: 001-0010
        • Baker J.
        • Ben-Tovim B.
        • Butcher A.
        • et al.
        Development of a modified diagnostic classification system for voice disorders with inter-rater reliability study.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015; 32: 99-112
        • Van Houtte E.
        • Claeys S.
        • Wuyts F.
        • et al.
        The Impact of Voice Disorders Among Teachers: Vocal Complaints, Treatment-Seeking Behavior, Knowledge of Vocal Care, and Voice-Related Absenteeism.
        Journal of Voice. 2011; 25: 570-575
        • Willinger U.
        • Völkl-Kernstock S.
        • Aschauer H.N.
        Marked depression and anxiety in patients with functional dysphonia.
        Psychiatry Research. 2005; 134: 85-91
        • Baker J.
        The role of psychogenic and psychosocial factors.
        International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2008; 10: 210-230
      1. Eastwood, C., C. Madill, and P. McCabe, The behavioural treatment of muscle tension voice disorders: A systematic review. 2015. p. 287-303.

        • Ruotsalainen J.
        • Sellman J.
        • Lehto L.
        • et al.
        Interventions for treating functional dysphonia in adults.
        Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews. 2009; CD006373
        • Speyer R.
        Effects of Voice Therapy: A Systematic Review.
        Journal of Voice. 2008; 22: 565-580
        • Carding P.
        • Bos-Clark M.
        • Fu S.
        • et al.
        Evaluating the efficacy of voice therapy for functional, organic and neurological voice disorders.
        Clin Otolaryngol. 2017; 42: 201-217
        • Behlau M.
        • Madazio G.
        • Oliveira G.
        Functional dysphonia: strategies to improve patient outcomes.
        Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015; 6: 243-253
        • Baker E.
        Optimal intervention intensity in speech-language pathology: Discoveries, challenges, and unchartered territories.
        International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2012; 14: 478-485
        • Meerschman I.
        • Claeys S.
        • Bettens K.
        • et al.
        Massed Versus Spaced Practice in Vocology: Effect of a Short-Term Intensive Voice Therapy Versus a Long-Term Traditional Voice Therapy.
        Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research. 2019; 62: 611-630
        • De Bodt M.
        • Patteeuw T.
        • Versele A.
        Temporal Variables in Voice Therapy.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 611-617
        • Bergan C.
        Motor Learning Principles and Voice Pedagogy: Theory and Practice.
        Journal of Singing. 2010; 66: 457-468
        • Thibeault S.L.
        • Zelazny S.K.
        • Cohen S.
        Voice Boot Camp: Intensive Treatment Success.
        ASHA Leader. 2009; 14: 26-27
        • Hapner E.
        • Portone-Maira C.
        • Johns M.
        A study of Voice Therapy drop out.
        The Journal of Voice. 2009; 23: 337-340
        • Patel R.R.
        • Bless D.M.
        • Thibeault S.L.
        Boot Camp: A Novel Intensive Approach to Voice Therapy.
        Journal of Voice. 2011; 25: 562-569
        • Portone C.
        • Johns 3rd, M.M.
        • Hapner E.R.
        A review of patient adherence to the recommendation for voice therapy.
        Journal of Voice. 2008; 22: 192-196
        • Wenke R.J.
        • Stabler P.
        • Walton C.
        • et al.
        Is More Intensive Better? Client and Service Provider Outcomes for Intensive Versus Standard Therapy Schedules for Functional Voice Disorders.
        Journal of Voice. 2014; 28: 652
        • Fischer M.J.
        • Gutenbrunner C.
        • Ptok M.
        Intensified voice therapy: a new model for the rehabilitation of patients suffering functional dysphonias.
        International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2009; 32: 348-355
        • Fox C.M.
        • Ramig L.O.
        • Ciucci M.R.
        • et al.
        The Science and Practice of LSVT/LOUD; Neural Plasticity-Principled Approach to Treating Individuals with Parkinson Disease and Other Neurological Disorders.
        Seminars in Speech and Language. 2006; 27: 283-299
        • Ramig L.O.
        • Sapir S.
        • Countryman S.
        • et al.
        Intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for patients with Parkinson's disease: a 2 year follow up.
        Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2001; 71: 493-498
        • Ramig L.O.
        • Sapir S.
        • Fox C.
        • et al.
        Changes in vocal loudness following intensive voice treatment (LSVT) in individuals with Parkinson's disease: A comparison with untreated patients and nornal age-matched controls.
        Movement Disorders. 2001; 16 (2001. Date of Publication: Jan 2001): 79-83
        • Sapir S.
        • Ramig L.O.
        • Hoyt P.
        • et al.
        Speech loudness and quality 12 months after intensive voice treatment (LSVT) for Parkinson's disease: A comparison with an alternative speech treatment.
        Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2002; 54 (2002. Date of Publication: 2002): 296-303
        • Behlau M.
        • Madazio G.
        • Pacheco C.
        • et al.
        Intensive Short-Term Voice Therapy: The Brazilian Experience.
        Perspectives on Voice & Voice Disorders. 2014; 24: 98
        • Verdolini-Marston K.
        • Burke M.
        • Lessac A.
        • et al.
        Preliminary study of two methods of treatment for laryngeal nodules.
        Journal of Voice. 1995; 9: 74-85
      2. Fu, S., D.G. Theodoros, and E.C. Ward, Delivery of Intensive Voice Therapy for Vocal Fold Nodules Via Telepractice: A Pilot Feasibility and Efficacy Study. 2015. p. 696-706.

        • Fu S.
        • Theodoros D.G.
        • Ward E.C.
        Intensive versus traditional voice therapy for vocal nodules: perceptual, physiological, acoustic and aerodynamic changes.
        J of Voice. 2015; 29: 260.e31-260.e44
        • Fu S.
        • Theodoros D.G.
        • Ward E.C.
        Long-term effects of an intensive voice treatment for vocal fold nodules.
        Int J Speech Lang Path. 2016; 18: 77-88
        • Verdolini Abbott K.
        Lessac-Madsen Resonant Voice Therapy: Clinician manual.
        Plural Publishing, San DIego, ca2008
        • Stemple J.C.
        • Lee L.
        • D'Amico B.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of vocal function exercises as a method of improving voice production.
        J Voice. 1994; 8: 271-278
        • Fu S.
        • Theodoros D.G.
        • Ward E.C.
        Intensive versus traditional voice therapy for vocal nodules: perceptual, physiological, acoustic and aerodynamic changes.
        Journal Of Voice: Official Journal Of The Voice Foundation. 2015; 29: 260.e31-260.e44
        • Bagnall A.D.
        • McCulloch K.
        The Impact of Specific Exertion on the Efficiency and Ease of the Voice: A Pilot Study.
        Journal of Voice. 2005; 19: 384-390
        • DeJonckere P.H.
        • Crevier-Buchman L.
        • Marie J.P.
        • et al.
        Implementation of the European Laryngological Society (ELS) basic protocol for assessing voice treatment effect.
        Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie. 2003; 124: 279-283
        • Walton C.
        • Carding P.
        • Conway E.
        • et al.
        Voice Outcome Measures for Adult Patients With Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis: A Systematic Review.
        The Laryngoscope. 2019; 129: 187-197
      3. Cardell, E., et al., A pilot study: Intensive vs non-intensive treatment dosage for functional dysphonia - multidimensional outcomes. Disability and Rehabilitation Under Rev.

        • Piaggio G.
        • Elbourne D.R.
        • Pocock S.J.
        • et al.
        Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement.
        JAMA. 2012; 308: 2594-2604
        • Perry A.
        • Skeat J.
        AusTOMs for Speech Pathology.
        Melbourne La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia2004
      4. Sealed Envelope: Randomisation and online databases for clinical trials.
        2020 ([cited 2020 May 6th ]; Available from:)
        • Morrison M.
        • Rammage L.A.
        Muscle misuse and voice disorders: Description and Classification.
        Acta Otolaryngoloy. 1993; 113: 428-434
        • Jacobson B.H.
        • Johnson A.
        • Grywalski C.
        • et al.
        The Voice Handicap Index (VHI): Development and Validation.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 1997; 6: 66-70
        • Wevosys
        LingWAVES Voice Clinic Suite Handbook.
        WEVOS-WEVOSYS, Germany2005
        • Fairbanks G.
        Voice and articulation drillbook.
        Harper and Row, New York1960
        • Heman-Ackah Y.D.
        • Sataloff R.T.
        • Laureyns G.
        • et al.
        Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 783-788
      5. ASHA, Consensus auditory-perceptual evalutaion of voice (CAPE-V). American Speech and Hearing Association Special Interest Division 3, 2002-2006.

        • Deary I.
        • Wilson J.
        • Carding P.
        • et al.
        VoiSS: a patient derived Voice Symptom Scale.
        Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 2003; 54: 483-489
        • Atkins L.
        • Francis J.
        • Islam R.
        • et al.
        A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.
        Implementation Science. 2017; 12: 77
        • Cane J.
        • O'Connor D.
        • Michie S.
        Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.
        Implement Sci. 2012; 7: 37
      6. Hoffmann, T.C., P.P. Glasziou, I. Boutron, et al., Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.2014. 348: p. g1687.

        • Verdolini K.
        • Druker D.G.
        • Palmer P.M.
        • et al.
        Laryngeal adduction in resonant voice.
        Journal of Voice. 1998; 12: 315-327
        • Theodoros D.G.
        • Hill A.J.
        • Russell T.G.
        Clinical and Quality of Life Outcomes of Speech Treatment for Parkinson's Disease Delivered to the Home Via Telerehabilitation: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Trial.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2016; 25: 214-232
        • Wasserstein R.L.
        • Schirm A.L.
        • Lazar N.A.
        Moving to a World Beyond “p < 0.05”.
        The American Statistician. 2019; 73: 1-19
        • Marshall A.P.
        • Hughes I.
        Statistics: The grammar of science.
        Australian Critical Care. 2020; 33: 113-115
        • Herbert R.
        Research Note: Significance testing and hypothesis testing: meaningless, misleading and mostly unnecessary.
        J Physiother. 2019; 65: 178-181
        • Wasserstein R.L.
        • Lazar N.A.
        The ASA Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose.
        The American Statistician. 2016; 70: 129-133
      7. Young, V.N., K. Jeong, S.D. Rothenberger, et al., Minimal clinically important difference of voice handicap index-10 in vocal fold paralysis.2018. 128(6): p. 1419-1424.

        • Kent P.
        • Sullivan P.
        • Smith A.
        • et al.
        RESTORE—Cognitive functional therapy with or without movement sensor biofeedback versus usual care for chronic, disabling low back pain: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
        BMJ Open. 2019; 9e031133
        • Cheney J.
        • Vidmar S.
        • Gailer N.
        • et al.
        Health-related quality-of-life in children with cystic fibrosis aged 5-years and associations with health outcomes.
        J Cyst Fibros. 2020; 19: 483-491
        • Åvitsland A.
        • Leibinger E.
        • Resaland G.K.
        • et al.
        Effects of school-based physical activity interventions on mental health in adolescents: The School in Motion cluster randomized controlled trial.
        Ment Health Phys Act. 2020; 19100348
        • NVivo Software
        QSR International.
        2018 (Melbourne, Australia)
        • Rose T.A.
        • Copley A.
        • Scarinci N.A.
        Benefits of providing an acute simulated learning environment to speech pathology students: An exploratory study.
        Focus on Health professional education: A multi-disciplinary journal. 2017; 18: 44-59
        • Sauder C.
        • Bretl M.
        • Eadie T.
        Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice ( ADSV ).
        Journal of Voice. 2017; 31: 557-566
        • WEVOSYS
        Voice Protocol Norms.
        Wevosys, Medical Technology GmBH, Baunach, Germany2013
        • Kempster G.B.
        • Gerratt B.R.
        • Abbott K.Verdolini
        • et al.
        Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009; 18: 124-132
        • Kleemola L.
        • Helminen M.
        • Rorarius E.
        • et al.
        Twelve-month clinical follow-up study of voice patients' recovery using the Voice Activity and Participation Profile (VAPP).
        J Voice. 2011; 25: e245-e254
        • Mansuri B.
        • Torabinezhad F.
        • Jamshidi A.-A.
        • et al.
        Effects of Voice Therapy on Vocal Tract Discomfort in Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
        Iranian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2019; 31: 297-304
        • Dehqan A.
        • Scherer R.C.
        Positive Effects of Manual Circumlaryngeal Therapy in the Treatment of Muscle Tension Dysphonia (MTD): Long Term Treatment Outcomes.
        J Voice. 2019; 33: 866-871
        • Khoramshahi H.
        • Khatoonabadi A.R.
        • Khoddami S.M.
        • et al.
        Responsiveness of Persian Version of Consensus Auditory Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), Persian Version of Voice Handicap Index (VHI), and Praat in Vocal Mass Lesions with Muscle Tension Dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2018; 32: 770.e21-770.e30
        • Ziegler A.
        • Dastolfo C.
        • Hersan R.
        • et al.
        Perceptions of voice therapy from patients diagnosed with primary muscle tension dysphonia and benign mid-membranous vocal fold lesions.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 742-752
        • Chan A.K.
        • McCabe P.
        • Madill C.J.
        The implementation of evidence-based practice in the management of adults with functional voice disorders: A national survey of speech-language pathologists.
        International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2013; 15: 334-344
        • Goffi-Fynn J.C.
        • Carroll L.M.
        Collaboration and Conquest: MTD as Viewed by Voice Teacher (Singing Voice Specialist) and Speech-Language Pathologist.
        Journal of Voice. 2013; 27: 391.e9-391.e14
        • Behrman A.
        Facilitating Behavioral Change in Voice Therapy: The Relevance of Motivational Interviewing.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2006; 15: 215-225
        • van Leer E.
        • Connor N.P.
        Patient perceptions of voice therapy adherence.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 458-469
        • Gunning D.
        • Wenke R.
        • Ward E.C.
        • et al.
        Clinicians’ perceptions of delivering new models of high intensity aphasia treatment.
        Aphasiology. 2017; 31: 406-426
        • Babbitt E.M.
        • Worrall L.E.
        • Cherney L.R.
        Clinician perspectives of an intensive comprehensive aphasia program.
        Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013; 20: 398-408