To compare flexible distal-chip laryngoscopy (FDL) and rigid telescopic laryngoscopy (RTL) in image quality and diagnostic ability.
Prospective cohort study; blinded comparison.
Eighteen normal adult subjects were recruited to undergo both FDL and RTL and normalized videos were recorded. Three blinded laryngologists compared the videos for color fidelity, illumination, resolution, and vascularity, and indicated superiority with FDL, RTL, or no difference. Raters also reported if an abnormality was seen and in which video it was better visualized. Videos for two subjects were repeated to assess intra-rater reliability, making 20 video comparisons across 3 raters for a total of 60 ratings. Differences in responses were analyzed via Mann-Whitney U and Pearson Χ2. Inter-rater reliability was assessed via Fleiss’ kappa, and intra-rater reliability was assessed via percent agreement.
RTL was rated superior in all categories of image quality (47 vs 5 vs 8, P < 0.01; 47 vs 7 vs 6, P < 0.01; 51 vs 5 vs 4, P<0.01; 44 vs 9 vs 7, P < 0.01, respectively). An abnormality was seen 33 times with both modalities and 6 times with RTL only. When seen with both modalities, visualization was superior in RTL compared with FDL (29 vs 4, P <0.01).
There was significant superiority of RTL in all categories of image quality, with slight inter-rater agreement for color fidelity, resolution, and vascularity. RTL was also significantly better for visualization of abnormalities. These findings suggest superior image quality in RTL compared with FDL, but further research is required to determine if this difference is clinically significant.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Journal of Voice
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Advances in office-based diagnosis and treatment in laryngology.Laryngoscope. 2009; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.20712
- Evaluation of dysphonic patients by general otolaryngologists.J Voice. 2012; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.11.009
- Prevalence of laryngeal irritation signs associated with reflux in asymptomatic volunteers: impact of endoscopic technique (rigid vs. flexible laryngoscope).Laryngoscope. 2005; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000184325.44968.b1
- Differences between flexible and rigid endoscopy in assessing the posterior glottic chink.J Voice. 2011; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.06.006
- Assessment of vibratory characteristics in children following airway reconstruction using flexible and rigid endoscopy and stroboscopy.JAMA Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2015; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2015.1740
- Reliability of thereflux finding score for infants in flexible versus rigid laryngoscopy.Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2016; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.04.017
- Flexible Laryngoscopy: A Comparison of Fiber Optic and Distal Chip Technologies. Part 1: Vocal Fold Masses.J Voice. 2008; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.04.003
- Flexible Laryngoscopy: A Comparison of Fiber Optic and Distal Chip Technologies-Part 2: Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.J Voice. 2009; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2007.10.007
- Prospective, randomized, single-blinded study comparing the use of a flexible nasendoscope and a rigid laryngoscope in outpatient laryngeal and pharyngeal examinations.J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 2009; (Published online)
- Sataloff's Comprehensive Textbook of Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery (Pediatric Otolaryngology) - Volume 6.Jaypee Brothers, Medical Publishers Pvt. Ltd, London, United Kingdom2016https://doi.org/10.5005/jp/books/12712
- Incidence of abnormal laryngeal findings in asymptomatic singing students.Otolaryngol - Head Neck Surg. 1999; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70128-2
- The impact of vocal and laryngeal pathologies among professional singers: a meta-analysis.J Voice. 2019; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.09.002
- The evaluation of benign glottic lesions: rigid telescopic stroboscopy versus suspension microlaryngoscopy.J Voice. 2007; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.09.006
- Interrater reliability in analysis of laryngoscopic features for unilateral vocal fold paresis.J Voice. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.08.018
Published online: March 26, 2021
Accepted: February 2, 2021
Declarations of interest: none
© 2021 The Voice Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.