Voice Acoustics and Vocal Effort in Mask-Wearing Healthcare Professionals: A Comparison Pre- and Post-Workday



      We evaluated voice acoustics and self-perceptual ratings in healthcare workers required to wear face masks throughout their workday.


      Eighteen subjects (11 cisgender female, 7 cisgender male; M = 33.72 years, SD = 8.30) completed self-perceptual ratings and acoustic recordings before and after a typical workday. Chosen measures were specific to vocal effort, dysphonia, and laryngeal tension. Mixed effects models were calculated to determine the impact of session, mask type, sex, and their interactions on the set of perceptual and acoustic measures.


      The subjects self-reported a significant increase in vocal effort following the workday. These perceptual changes coincided with an increase in vocal intensity and harmonics-to-noise ratio, but decrease in relative fundamental frequency offset 10. As expected, men and women differed in measures related to fundamental frequency and vocal tract length.


      Healthcare professionals wearing masks reported greater vocal symptoms post-workday compared to pre-workday. These symptoms coincided with acoustic changes previously related to vocal effort; however, the degree of change was considered mild. Further research is needed to determine whether vocal hygiene strategies may reduce vocal symptoms in mask-wearing workers.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Titze IR
        • Lemke J
        • Montequin D.
        Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report.
        J Voice. 1997; 11: 254-259
        • Roy N
        • Merrill RM
        • Thibeault S
        • et al.
        Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004; 47: 281-293
        • Bartoszko JJ
        • Farooqi MAM
        • Alhazzani W
        • et al.
        Medical masks vs N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
        Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2020; 14: 365-373
        • Corey RM
        • Jones U
        • Singer AC.
        Acoustic effects of medical, cloth, and transparent face masks on speech signals.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2020; 148: 2371-2375
        • Monson BB
        • Hunter EJ
        • Lotto AJ
        • et al.
        The perceptual significance of high-frequency energy in the human voice.
        Front Psychol. 2014; 5: 1-11
        • Mendel LL
        • Gardino JA
        • Atcherson SR.
        Speech understanding using surgical masks: A problem in health care?.
        J Am Acad Audiol. 2008; 19: 686-695
        • Champion J
        • Holt R.
        Dental care for children and young people who have a hearing impairment.
        Br Dent J. 2000; 189: 155-159
        • Radonovich LJ
        • Yanke R
        • Cheng J
        • et al.
        Diminished speech intelligibility associated with certain types of respirators worn by healthcare workers.
        J Occup Environ Hyg. 2009; 7: 63-70
        • Ribeiro VV
        • Dassie-Leite AP
        • Pereira EC
        • et al.
        Effect of wearing a face mask on vocal self-perception during a pandemic.
        J Voice. 2020; (Published online)S0892199720303568
        • Dallaston K
        • Rumbach AF.
        Vocal performance of group fitness instructors before and after instruction: changes in acoustic measures and self-ratings.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 127.e1-127.e8
        • Laukkanen A-M
        • Ilomäki I
        • Leppänen K
        • et al.
        Acoustic measures and self-reports of vocal fatigue by female teachers.
        J Voice. 2008; 22: 283-289
        • Lehto L
        • Laaksonen L
        • Vilkman E
        • et al.
        Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic measurements—do they correlate?.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2006; 31: 147-152
        • Rantala L
        • Vilkman E
        • Bloigu R.
        Voice changes during work.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 344-355
        • Anand S
        • Bottalico P
        • Gray C.
        Vocal fatigue in prospective vocal professionals.
        J Voice. 2019; (Published onlinein press)
        • Boominathan P
        • Anitha R
        • Shenbagavalli M
        • et al.
        Voice characteristics and recovery patterns in indian adult males after vocal loading.
        J India Inst Speech Hear. 2010; 29: 220-231
        • Remacle A
        • Finck C
        • Roche A
        • et al.
        Vocal impact of a prolonged reading task at two intensity levels: objective measurements and subjective self-ratings.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: e177-e186
        • Stemple JC
        • Stanley J
        • Lee L.
        Objective measures of voice production in normal subjects following prolonged voice use.
        J Voice. 1995; 9: 127-133
        • Vintturi J
        • Alku P
        • Lauri E-R
        • et al.
        The effects of post-loading rest on acoustic parameters with special reference to gender and ergonomic factors.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2001; 53: 338-350
        • Whitling S
        • Rydell R
        • Lyberg Åhlander V
        Design of a clinical vocal loading test with long-time measurement of voice.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 261.e13-261.e27
        • Fujiki RB
        • Sivasankar MP.
        A review of vocal loading tasks in the voice literature.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 388.e33-388.e39
        • Remacle A
        • Garnier M
        • Gerber S
        • et al.
        Vocal change patterns during a teaching day: Inter- and intra-subject variability.
        J Voice. 2018; 32: 57-63
        • Awan SN
        • Roy N
        • Dromey C.
        Estimating dysphonia severity in continuous speech: Application of a multi-parameter spectral/cepstral model.
        Clin Linguist Phon. 2009; 23: 825-841
        • Heman-Ackah YD
        • Sataloff RT
        • Laureyns G
        • et al.
        Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 783-788
        • Fujiki RB
        • Chapleau A
        • Sundarrajan A
        • et al.
        The interaction of surface hydration and vocal loading on voice measures.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 211-217
        • Gorham Rowan M
        • Berndt A.
        The effect of a vocal loading task on vocal function before and after 24 hours of thickened liquid use.
        J Speech Pathol Ther. 2016; 1: 1-5
        • Sandage MJ
        • Hamby HA
        • Barnett LA
        • et al.
        Vocal function differences before and after sorority recruitment.
        J Voice. 2020; (Published onlinein press)
        • Hunter EJ
        • Cantor-Cutiva LC
        • van Leer E
        • et al.
        Toward a consensus description of vocal effort, vocal load, vocal loading, and vocal fatigue.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63: 509-532
        • McKenna VS
        • Diaz-Cadiz ME
        • Shembel AC
        • et al.
        The relationship between physiological mechanisms and the self-perception of vocal effort.
        JSLHR. 2019; 62: 815-834
        • McKenna VS
        • Stepp CE.
        The relationship between acoustical and perceptual measures of vocal effort.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2018; 144: 1643-1658
        • Rosenthal AL
        • Lowell SY
        • Colton RH.
        Aerodynamic and acoustic features of vocal effort.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 144-153
        • Stepp CE
        • Merchant GR
        • Heaton JT
        • et al.
        Effects of voice therapy on relative fundamental frequency during voicing offset and onset in patients with vocal hyperfunction.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011; 54: 1260-1266
        • Eadie TL
        • Stepp CE.
        Acoustic correlate of vocal effort in spasmodic dysphonia.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2013; 122: 169-176
        • Lowell SY
        • Kelley RT
        • Colton RH
        • et al.
        Position of the hyoid and larynx in people with muscle tension dysphonia.
        The Laryngoscope. 2012; 122: 370-377
        • Roy N
        • Ferguson N.
        Formant frequency changes following manual circumalaryngeal therapy for functional dysphonia: evidence of laryngeal lowering?.
        J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2001; 9: 169-175
        • Morrison M.
        Pattern recognition in muscle misuse voice disorders: how I do it.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 1997; 11: 108-114
        • Khoddami SM
        • Ansari NN
        • Jalaie S.
        Review on laryngeal palpation methods in muscle tension dysphonia: Validity and reliability issues.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2015; 29: 459-468
        • Roy N.
        Assessment and treatment of musculoskeletal tension in hyperfunctional voice disorders.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008; 10: 195-209
        • Lammert AC
        • Narayanan SS.
        On short-time estimation of vocal tract length from formant frequencies.
        PLOS ONE. 2015; 10 (Larson CR, ed)e0132193
        • Borg G.
        Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion.
        Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982; 14: 377-381
        • Borg G.
        Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.
        Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990; 16: 55-58
        • Sandage MJ
        • Connor NP
        • Pascoe DD.
        Voice function differences following resting breathing versus submaximal exercise.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 572-578
        • Sundarrajan A
        • Fujiki RB
        • Loerch SE
        • et al.
        Vocal loading and environmental humidity effects in older adults.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 707-713
        • Tanner K
        • Fujiki RB
        • Dromey C
        • et al.
        Laryngeal desiccation challenge and nebulized isotonic saline in healthy male singers and nonsingers: Effects on acoustic, aerodynamic, and self-perceived effort and dryness measures.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 670-676
        • Lien Y-AS
        • Heller Murray ES
        • Calabrese CR
        • et al.
        Validation of an algorithm for semi-automated estimation of voice relative fundamental frequency.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017; 126: 712-716
        • McKenna VS
        • Heller Murray ES
        • Lien Y-AS
        • et al.
        The relationship between relative fundamental frequency and a kinematic estimate of laryngeal stiffness in healthy adults.
        JSLHR. 2016; 59: 1283-1294
        • Boersma P.
        Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.
        Glot Int. 2001; 5: 341-345
        • Wakita H.
        Normalization of vowels by vocal-tract length and its application to vowel identification.
        IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Signal Process. 1977; 25: 183-192
        • Koo TK
        • Li MY.
        A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163
        • Vilkman E
        • Lauri E-R
        • Alku P
        • et al.
        Effects of prolonged oral reading on F0, SPL, subglottal pressure and amplitude characteristics of glottal flow waveforms.
        J Voice. 1999; 13: 303-312
        • Heller Murray ES
        • Hands GL
        • Calabrese CR
        • et al.
        Effects of adventitious acute vocal trauma: Relative fundamental frequency and listener perception.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 177-185
        • Joseph BE
        • Joseph AM
        • Jacob TM.
        Vocal fatigue—do young speech-language pathologists practice what they preach?.
        J Voice. 2020; 34: 647.e1-647.e5
        • Lyberg-Åhlander V
        • Pelegrín García D
        • Whitling S
        • et al.
        Teachers’ voice use in teaching environments: A field study using ambulatory phonation monitor.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 841.e5-841.e15
        • Van Stan JH
        • Mehta DD
        • Zeitels SM
        • et al.
        Average ambulatory measures of sound pressure level, fundamental frequency, and vocal dose do not differ between adult females with phonotraumatic lesions and matched control subjects.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015; 124: 864-874
        • Švec J
        • Popolo P
        • Titze I.
        Measurement of vocal doses in speech: experimental procedure and signal processing.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2003; 28: 181-192
        • Titze IR
        • Švec JG
        • Popolo PS.
        Vocal dose measures: quantifying accumulated vibration exposure in vocal fold tissues.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46: 919-932