Advertisement

Can Resident Auditory-Perceptual Voice Assessments Predict Medical Urgency of Voice Disorders?

      Abstract

      Background/Objectives

      Growing reliance on telemedicine has created new triaging challenges. This study investigated how effectively otolaryngology resident auditory-perceptual voice assessments performed via telemedicine determined the need for urgent in-person clinic visits.

      Methods

      Twelve otolaryngology resident physicians (PGY1–PGY5) performed auditory-perceptual assessments on 25 voice samples recorded during initial voice evaluations. Voice samples were balanced in severity and taken in equal numbers from patients with the following diagnoses: benign laryngeal lesions, laryngeal cancer, functional voice disorders, laryngeal edema (associated with LPR), and laryngeal paralysis/paresis. Urgent diagnoses were defined as laryngeal cancer and severe unilateral laryngeal paralysis. For each voice sample, residents were initially blinded to patient medical history. Residents rated severity of voice disorder, predicted patient diagnosis, and determined the urgency of seeing the patient in clinic. Residents then reviewed information from the patient's medical history and again rated urgency of voice disorder.

      Results

      On average, residents identified urgent voice disorders in 56% of cases. After reviewing medical history, this number significantly increased to 77% (P = 0.001). Voice severity, smoking history, time since onset, and course of symptoms were considered most influential when determining medical urgency of voice patients. Year in residency program had no effect on rating accuracy. As expected, diagnostic accuracy of auditory-perceptual assessments was low, ranging from 40% for laryngeal paralysis/paresis to 5% for laryngeal edema.

      Conclusion

      Auditory-perceptual voice assessment, combined with medical history, predicted most medically urgent voice disorders. Further work should investigate if task-specific training might improve these results and which medical history items are most critical. Until accuracy of auditory-perceptual assessment of medical urgency is improved, these data underscore the importance of laryngeal examination in identifying medical urgency and etiology of dysphonia.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Bryson PC
        • Benninger MS
        • Band J
        • et al.
        Telemedicine in laryngology: Remote evaluation of voice disorders-setup and initial experience.
        Laryngoscope. 2018; 128: 941-943https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26975
        • Molini-Avejonas DR
        • Rondon-Melo S
        • Amato CA de LH
        • et al.
        A systematic review of the use of telehealth in speech, language and hearing sciences.
        J Telemed Telecare. 2015; 21: 367-376https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X15583215
        • Mashima PA
        • Birkmire-Peters DP
        • Syms MJ
        • et al.
        Telehealth: voice therapy using telecommunications technology.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003; 12: 432-439https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/089
        • Zhang X
        • Zhang P.
        Telemedicine in clinical setting.
        Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine. 2016; 12: 2405-2407https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3656
        • Kohlert S
        • Murphy P
        • Tse D
        • et al.
        Improving Access to Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Expert Advice Through eConsultations.
        The Laryngoscope. 2018; 128: 350-355https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26677
        • Barua B.
        Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada. 2015 Report Vancouver.
        The Fraser Institute, British Columbia, Canada2016: 1-98 (Published online)
        • Pollock K
        • Setzen M
        • Svider P.
        Embracing telemedicine into your otolaryngology practice amid the COVID-19 crisis: An invited commentary.
        Am J Otolaryngol. 2020; : 41https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102490
        • Triantafillou V
        • Rajasekaran K.
        A Commentary on the Challenges of Telemedicine for Head and Neck Oncologic Patients during COVID-19.
        Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 2020; 163: 81-82
        • Mashima PA
        • Brown JE.
        Remote management of voice and swallowing disorders.
        Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011; 44: 1305-1316https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2011.08.007
        • Strohl M
        • Dwyer C
        • y Ma
        • et al.
        Implementation of Telemedicine in a Laryngology Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned, Experiences Shared.
        Journal of Voice. 2021; (Published online In Press)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.06.017
        • Roy N
        • Barkmeier-Kraemer J
        • Eadie T
        • et al.
        Evidence-based clinical voice assessment: a systematic review.
        American journal of speech-language pathology. 2013; 22: 212-226https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0014
        • Patel R
        • N. Awan Shaheen
        • Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer
        • et al.
        Recommended Protocols for Instrumental Assessment of Voice: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Expert Panel to Develop a Protocol for Instrumental Assessment of Vocal Function.
        American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 2018; 27: 887-905https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009
        • Zraick R
        • Kempster G
        • Connor N
        • et al.
        Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
        American Journal of speech-language pathology. 2011; 20: 14-22https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0105
        • Kelchner L
        • Brehm S
        • Weinrich B
        • et al.
        Perceptual evaluation of severe pediatric voice disorders: rater reliability using the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice.
        Journal of Voice. 2010; 24: 441-449https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.09.004
        • Webb A
        • Carding P
        • Deary I
        • et al.
        The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia.
        Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-L. 2004; 261: 429-434
        • Bhuta T
        • Patrick L
        • Garnett JD.
        Perceptual evaluation of voice quality and its correlation with acoustic measurements.
        J Voice. 2004; 18: 299-304https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.12.004
        • Awan S
        • Roy N
        • Jetté M
        • et al.
        Quantifying dysphonia severity using a spectral/cepstral-based acoustic index: Comparisons with auditory-perceptual judgements from the CAPE-V.
        Clin Linguist Phon. 2010; 24: 742-758
        • Eadie T
        • Doyle P.
        Classification of dysphonic voices: acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures.
        J Voice. 2005; 19: 1-14https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.02.002
        • De Bodt M
        • Wuyts F
        • Van De Heyning P
        • et al.
        Test-Retest Study of the GRBAS Scale: Influence of Experience and Professional Background on Perceptual Rating of Voice Quality.
        Journal Of Voice. 1995; 11: 74-80
        • Eadie TL
        • Baylor CR.
        The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice.
        J Voice. 2006; 20: 527-544https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.007
        • Kreiman J
        • Gerratt BR
        • Precoda K.
        Listener experience and perception of voice quality.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1990; 33: 103-115https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3301.103
        • Eadie T
        • Kapsner-Smith M.
        The Effect of Listener Experience and Anchors on Judgments of Dysphonia.
        JSLHR. 2011; 54: 430-447https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0205
        • Eadie T
        • Sroka A
        • Wright D
        • et al.
        Does Knowledge of Medical Diagnosis Bias Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia?.
        Journal Of Voice. 2011; 25: 420-429https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.12.009
        • Sauder C
        • Eadie T.
        Does the Accuracy of Medical Diagnoses Affect Novice Listeners’ Auditory-Perceptual Judgments of Dysphonia Severity?.
        Journal of Voice. 2020; 34: 197-207https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.08.001
        • Kreiman J
        • Gerratt BR
        • Ito M.
        When and why listeners disagree in voice quality assessment tasks.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; 122: 2354-2364https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2770547
        • Misono S
        • Merati L
        • Eadie T
        Developing Auditory-Perceptual Judgment Reliability in Otolaryngology Residents.
        Journal of Voice. 2012; 26: 358-364https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.07.006
        • Kempster GB
        • Gerratt BR
        • Verdolini Abbott K
        • et al.
        Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice: development of a standardized clinical protocol.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2009; 18: 124-132https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2008/08-0017
        • Ko H
        • Lee L
        • Li H
        • et al.
        Etiologic Features in Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis in Taiwan.
        Chang Gung Med J. 2009; 32: 290-296
        • Toutounchi S
        • Eydi M
        • Golzari S
        • et al.
        Vocal Cord Paralysis and its Etiologies: A Prospective Study.
        J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2014; 6: 47-50https://doi.org/10.5681/jcvtr.2014.009
        • Chen C
        • Jen Y
        • Wang C
        • et al.
        Etiology of Vocal Cord Paralysis.
        ORL : Journal for Oto - Rhino - Laryngology and its Related Specialties. 2007; 69: 167-171https://doi.org/10.1159/000099226
        • Halperin A
        • Spielman J
        • Hunter E
        • et al.
        The inability to produce soft voice (IPSV): A tool to detect vocal change in school-teachers.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009; 34: 117-127https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430903062712
        • Bastian R
        • Keidar A
        • Verdolini-Marston K.
        Simple vocal tasks for detecting vocal fold swelling.
        J Voice. 1990; 4: 172-183https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80144-4
        • Thomas SA
        • Maruthy S.
        Comparison of Habitual and High Pitch Phonation in Teachers With and Without Vocal Fatigue.
        Journal of Voice. 2020; (Published online May 13)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.04.016
        • Fujiki RB
        • Huber JE
        • Sivasankar MP.
        Mitigating the Effects of Acute Vocal Exertion in Individuals With Vocal Fatigue.
        Laryngoscope. 2021; (Published online May 19)https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29627
        • Belafsky PC
        • Mouadeb DA
        • Rees CJ
        • et al.
        Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008; 117: 919-924https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940811701210
        • Weerathunge HR
        • Segina RK
        • Tracy L
        • et al.
        Accuracy of Acoustic Measures of Voice via Telepractice Videoconferencing Platforms.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; (Published online June 22): 1-14https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00625
        • Fujiki RB
        • Sanders PW
        • Sivasankar MP
        • Halum S
        Determining Medical Urgency of Voice Disorders Using Auditory-Perceptual Voice Assessments Performed by Speech-Language Pathologists..
        Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. 2021; Published online July 20https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894211032779