Advertisement

Eliciting and Characterizing Porcine Vocalizations: When Pigs Fly

      Summary

      Background/Objectives

      While voice-related therapeutic interventions are often researched preclinically in the porcine model, there are no well-established methods to induce porcine glottic phonation. Described approaches, such as training animals to phonate for positive reinforcement are time-consuming and plagued by inherent variability in the type of phonation produced and contamination of background noise. Thus, a reliable method of assessing glottic phonation in the porcine model is needed.

      Methods

      In this study, we have created a novel pulley-based apparatus with harness for “pig-lifting” with surrounding acoustic insulation and high-directional microphone with digital recorder for recording phonation. Praat and Matlab were used to analyze all porcine vocalizations for fundamental frequency (F0), intensity, duration of phonation and cepstral peak prominence (CPP). Glottic phonation was detected using F0 (≥2000 hz), duration (≥3 seconds) and researcher perceptual judgment. Partial-glottic phonations were also analyzed. Reliability between researcher judgment and acoustic measures for glottic phonation detection was high.

      Results

      Acoustic analysis demonstrated that glottic and partial-glottic phonation was consistently elicited, with no formal training of the minipigs required. Glottic vocalizations increased with multiple lifts. Glottic phonation continued to be elicited after multiple days but became less frequent. Glottic and partial-glottic phonations had similar CPP values over the 6 experimental days.

      Conclusion

      Our cost-effective, reliable method of inducing and recording glottic phonation in the porcine model may provide a cost effective, preclinical tool in voice research.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Hughes HC
        Swine in cardiovascular research.
        Lab Anim Sci. 1986; 36 (Available at:): 348-350
        • Swindle MM
        • Makin A
        • Herron AJ
        • Clubb Jr, FJ
        • Frazier KS
        Swine as models in biomedical research and toxicology testing.
        Vet Pathol. 2012; 49: 344-356https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985811402846
        • Tumbleson ME
        • Schook LB
        Advances in Swine in Biomedical Research. 2. Springer Science & Business Media, Germany1996
      1. Kurita, S A comparative study of the layer structure of the vocal fold. Vocal fold physiology. 1981; 3-21. doi: 10.11334/jibi1954.28.4Supplement2_699.

        • Jiang JJ
        • Raviv JR
        • Hanson DG
        Comparison of the phonation-related structures among pig, dog, white-tailed deer, and human larynges.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001; 110: 1120-1125https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940111001207
        • Illmann G
        • Hammerschmidt K
        • Spinka M
        • Tallet C
        Calling by domestic piglets during simulated crushing and isolation: a signal of need?.
        PLOS One. 2013; 13 (8): e83529https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083529
        • Marx G
        • Horn T
        • Thielebein J
        • Knubel B
        • von Borell E
        Analysis of pain-related vocalization in young pigs.
        J Sound Vibration. 2003; 266: 687-698https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-460X(03)00594-7
        • Jensen P
        • Algers B
        An ethogram of piglet vocalizations during suckling.
        Appl Animal Ethol. 1984; 11: 237-248https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3762(84)90030-0
        • Aker M
        • Long J
        Establishing a novel form of phonation analysis for a stem-cell based outer vocal fold replacement (COVR)Poster presented at: DGSOM Josiah Brown Summer Research Session, Los Angeles, CA2020
        • Barker E
        • Macchiarini P
        • Murison P
        • et al.
        An ex vivo model for reperfusion of laryngotracheal grafts.
        Laryngoscope. 2005; 115: 699-702https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000161330.75600.4b
        • Durkes A
        • Sivasankar MP
        In vivo investigation of acidified pepsin exposure to porcine vocal fold epithelia.
        Laryngoscope. 2016; 126: E12-E17https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25478
        • Gorti GK
        • Birchall MA
        • Haverson K
        • Macchiarini P
        • Bailey M
        A preclinical model for laryngeal transplantation: anatomy and mucosal immunology of the porcine larynx.
        Transplantation. 1999; 68: 1638-1642https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-199912150-00006
        • Gould FDH
        • Yglesias B
        • Ohlemacher J
        • German RZ
        Pre-pharyngeal swallow effects of recurrent laryngeal nerve lesion on bolus shape and airway protection in an infant pig model.
        Dysphagia. 2017; 32: 362-373https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-016-9762-2
        • Johanes I
        • Mihelc E
        • Sivasankar M
        • Ivanisevic A
        Morphological properties of collagen fibers in porcine lamina propria.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 254-257https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.006
        • Rohlfing ML
        • Kuperstock JE
        • Friedman D
        • Spiegel JH
        An ex vivo porcine model of the anterior glottoplasty for voice feminization surgery.
        Laryngoscope. 2020; 130: E206-E212https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28204
        • Ayache S
        • Ouaknine M
        • Dejonkere P
        • Prindere P
        • Giovanni A
        Experimental study of the effects of surface mucus viscosity on the glottic cycle.
        J Voice. 2004; 18: 107-115https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.07.004
        • Maunsell R
        • Ouaknine M
        • Giovanni A
        • Crespo A
        Vibratory pattern of vocal folds under tension asymmetry.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006; 135: 438-444https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.023
        • Ouaknine M
        • Garrel R
        • Giovanni A
        Separate detection of vocal fold vibration by optoreflectometry: a study of biphonation on excised porcine larynges.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2003; 55: 28-38https://doi.org/10.1159/000068058
        • Rousseau B
        • Tateya I
        • Lim X
        • Munoz-del-Rio A
        • Bless DM
        Investigation of anti-hyaluronidase treatment on vocal fold wound healing.
        J Voice. 2006; 20: 443-451https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.06.002
        • Manteuffel G
        • Schon PC
        Measuring pig welfare by automatic monitoring of stress calls.
        Bornier Agratechnische, Bericht. 2004; 29: 110-118
        • Tykalova T
        • Hlavnicka J
        • Macakova M
        • et al.
        Grunting in a genetically modified minipig animal model for Huntington's disease—pilot experiments.
        Ceska a Slov Neurol a Neurochir. 2015; 78/111: 61-65https://doi.org/10.14735/amcsnn20152S61
        • Blakeslee DB
        • Banks RE
        • Eusterman V
        • Brooks D
        Analysis of vocal fold function in the miniswine model.
        J Invest Surg. 1995; 8: 409-424https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939509031607
        • Murugappan S
        • Boyce S
        • Khosla S
        • Kelchner L
        • Gutmark E
        Acoustic characteristics of phonation in "wet voice" conditions.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2010; 127: 2578-2589https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3308478
        • Gorjian B
        • Hayati A
        • Pourkhoni P
        Using Praat software in teaching prosodic features to EFL learners.
        Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 2013; 84: 34-40https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.505
        • Nishio N
        • Fujimoto Y
        • Suga K
        • et al.
        Autologous fat injection therapy including a high concentration of adipose-derived regenerative cells in a vocal fold paralysis model: animal pilot study.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2016; 130: 914-922https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215116008707
        • Lamprecht R
        • Maghzinajafabdi M
        • Semmler M
        • Sutor A
        Imaging the vocal folds: a feasibility study on strain imaging and elastography of porcine vocal folds.
        Appl Sci. 2019; 9: 2729https://doi.org/10.3390/app9132729
        • Burks WG
        Dissertation.
        Virginia Tech, 2020
        • Diana A
        • Carpentier L
        • Piette D
        • et al.
        An ethogram of biter and bitten pigs during an ear biting event: first step in the development of a precision livestock farming tool.
        Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2019; : 26-36https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLANIM.2019.03.011
        • Vandermeulen J
        • Bahr C
        • Tullo E
        • et al.
        Discerning pig screams in production environments.
        PLOS One. 2015; 29 (10)e0123111https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123111
        • Murton O
        • Hillman R
        • Mehta D
        Cepstral peak prominence values for clinical voice evaluation.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020; 4 (29): 1596-1607https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_AJSLP-20-00001
        • Carter RA
        • Johnson P
        • Read M
        A minimal injury restraining device for swine.
        Lab Animal Sci. 1980; 30: 716-718
        • Grandin T
        Minimizing stress in pig handling in the research lab.
        Lab Animal. 1986; 15 (Available at:)
        • Heman-Ackah YD
        • Heuer RJ
        • Michael DD
        • et al.
        Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003; 112: 324-333https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940311200406
        • Alipour F
        • Jaiswal S
        • Vigmostad S
        Vocal fold elasticity in the pig, sheep, and cow larynges.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 130-136https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.002
        • Burks G
        • De Vita R
        • Leonessa A
        Characterization of the continuous elastic parameters of porcine vocal folds.
        J Voice. 2020; 34: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.007
        • Semmler M
        • Berry DA
        • Schützenberger A
        • Döllinger M
        Fluid-structure-acoustic interactions in an ex vivo porcine phonation model.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 2021; 149: 1657https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0003602
        • Zhang C
        • Paddock K
        • Chou A
        • Scholp A
        • Gong T
        • Jiang JJ
        Prolonged phonation impairs the integrity and barrier function of porcine vocal fold epithelium: a preliminary study.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 275: 1547-1556https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4973-9
        • Durkes A
        • Sivasankar MP
        A method to administer agents to the larynx in an awake large animal.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017; 60: 3171-3176https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0040
        • Liu X
        • Mustonen A
        • Zheng W
        • Sivasankar MP
        • Durkes AC
        Cigarette Smoke Exposure to Pig Larynx in an Inhalation Chamber.
        J Voice. 2019; 33: 846-850https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.05.005
        • Pisanski K
        • Raine J
        • Reby D
        Individual differences in human voice pitch are preserved from speech to screams, roars and pain cries.
        R Soc Open Sci. 2020; 7191642https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191642
        • Riley JL
        • Riley WD
        • Carroll LM
        Frequency characteristics in animal species typically used in laryngeal research: an exploratory investigation.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 767.e17-767.e24https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.019