Advertisement

The Effectiveness of Gender Affirming Voice Training for Transfeminine Clients: A Comparison of Traditional Versus Intensive Delivery Schedules

      Summary

      Introduction

      Gender affirming voice training is a service provided by speech language pathologists to members of the trans and gender diverse community. While there is some evidence to support the effectiveness of this training, the evidence base is limited by a lack of prospective studies with large sample sizes. Finally, there has been only limited research investigating the effectiveness of this training when delivered on intensive (compressed) schedules, even though such schedules are used in clinical practice and may have practical benefits such as increasing service access for this vulnerable population.

      Methodology

      This study aimed to investigate and compare the effectiveness gender affirming voice training among 34 trans individuals presumed male at birth aiming to develop a perceptually feminine/female-sounding voice. Among these 34 participants, 17 received their training on a traditional schedule (one 45-minute session per week over 12 weeks) and 17 on an intensive scheduled (three 45-minute sessions per week over 4 weeks). Building on a previous mixed methodological study which indicated that these two training groups were equally satisfied with training outcomes, the current study utilised a wide range of self-report, acoustic, and auditory-perceptual outcome measures (including self-ratings and listener-ratings of voice) to investigate training effectiveness.

      Discussion

      Results from this study indicated that both training programs were similarly effective, producing positive statistically significant change among participants on a range of outcome measures. Participants in both groups demonstrated significant auditory-perceptual and acoustic voice change and reported increased satisfaction with voice, increased congruence between gender identity and expression, and a reduction in the negative impact of voice concerns on everyday life. However, as has been the case in past studies, training was not sufficient for all participants to achieve their goal of developing a consistently feminine/female-sounding voice.

      Conclusion

      This study provides evidence to suggest that gender affirming voice training for transfeminine clients may be similarly effective whether delivered intensively or traditionally. This study provides evidence to support the practice of using a wide range of outcome measures to gain holistic insight into client progress in gender affirming voice training programs.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. World Professional Association for Transgender Health. Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people [7th version]; 2012. https://www.wpath.org/publications/soc

        • American Psychological Association
        Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people.
        Am Psychol. 2015; 70: 832-864https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039906
        • Vincent B.
        Introducing trans terminology.
        Transgender Health : A Practitioner's Guide to Binary and Non-Binary Trans Patient Care. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2018: 17-38
        • Richards C
        • Bouman WP
        • Seal L
        • et al.
        Non-binary or genderqueer genders.
        Int Rev Psychiatry. 2016; 28: 95-102https://doi.org/10.3109/09540261.2015.1106446
        • Azul D.
        On the varied and complex factors affecting gender diverse people's vocal situations: implications for clinical practice.
        Perspect Voice Voice Disord. 2015; 25: 75-86https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd25.2.75
        • Azul D
        • Hancock AB.
        Who or what has the capacity to influence voice production? Development of a transdisciplinary theoretical approach to clinical practice addressing voice and the communication of speaker socio-cultural positioning.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020; 0: 1-12https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2019.1709544
        • Fiani CN
        • Han HJ.
        Navigating identity: Experiences of binary and non-binary transgender and gender non-conforming (TGNC) adults.
        Int J Transgenderism. 2019; 20: 181-194https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1426074
        • Reisner SL
        • Poteat T
        • Keatley JA
        • et al.
        Global health burden and needs of transgender populations: a review.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 412-436https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00684-X
        • Valentine SE
        • Shipherd JC.
        A systematic review of social stress and mental health among transgender and gender non-conforming people in the United States.
        Clin Psychol Rev. 2018; 66: 24-38https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.03.003
        • Zeeman L
        • Sherriff N
        • Browne K
        • et al.
        A review of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex (LGBTI) health and healthcare inequalities.
        Eur J Public Health. 2019; 29: 974-980https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/cky226
        • Garrison S.
        On the limits of “Trans Enough”: authenticating trans identity narratives.
        Gend Soc. 2018; 32: 613-637https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243218780299
        • Vincent B.
        Breaking down barriers and binaries in trans healthcare: the validation of non-binary people.
        Int J Transgenderism. 2019; 20: 132-137https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2018.1534075
        • Mills M
        • Stoneham G
        • Georgiadou I.
        Expanding the evidence: Developments and innovations in clinical practice, training and competency within voice and communication therapy for trans and gender diverse people.
        Int J Transgenderism. 2017; 18: 328-342https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1329049
        • Kalra M.
        Voice therapy with a transsexual.
        in: Gemme R Wheeler CC Progress in Sexology: Selected Papers from the Proceedings of the 1976 International Congress of Sexology. Plenum Press, 1977: 77-84
        • Oates J.
        Evidence-based practive in voice training for trans women.
        in: Adler R Hirsch S Pickering J Voice and Communication Therapy for the Transgender/Transsexual Client: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. 3rd ed. Plural Publishing, 2019: 87-103
        • Leyns C
        • Papeleu T
        • Tomassen P
        • et al.
        Effects of speech therapy for transgender women: a systematic review.
        Int J Transgender Heal. 2021; 0: 1-21https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2021.1915224
      2. Oates J, Dacakis G. Submission to the senate inquiry: prevalence of different types of speech, language, and communication disorders and speech pathology services in Australia.; 2014. http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Community_Affairs/Speech_Pathology

        • Antoni C.
        Service delivery and the challenges of providing service to people who are transgender.
        Perspect Voice Voice Disord. 2015; 25: 59-65https://doi.org/10.1044/vvd25.2.59
        • Quinn S
        • Oates J
        • Dacakis G.
        The experiences of trans and gender diverse clients in an intensive voice training program: a mixed-methodological study.
        J Voice. 2021; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.033
        • Baker E.
        Optimal intervention intensity.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 14: 401-409https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.700323
        • Baker E.
        Optimal intervention intensity in speech-language pathology: Discoveries, challenges, and unchartered territories.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 14: 478-485https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.717967
        • Van Borsel J
        • De Maesschalck D.
        Speech rate in males, females, and male-to-female transsexuals.
        Clin Linguist Phon. 2008; 22: 679-685https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200801976695
        • Warren SF
        • Fey ME
        • Yoder PJ.
        Differential treatment intensity research: a missing link to creating optimally effective communication interventions.
        Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007; 13: 70-77https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20139
        • Dacakis G.
        Considerations for intake and assessment.
        in: Adler R Hirsch S Pickering J Voice and Communication Therapy for the Transgender/Transsexual Client: A Comprehensive Clinical Guide. 3rd ed. Plural Publishing, 2019: 105-126
        • Byrne LA.
        My Life as a Woman: Placing Communication Within the Social Context of Life for Transsexual Women.
        La Trobe University, 2007 (Dissertation)
        • Stewart L
        • O'Halloran P
        • Oates J.
        Investigating the social integration and wellbeing of transgender individuals: a meta-synthesis.
        Int J Transgenderism. 2018; 19: 46-58https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2017.1364199
        • Wenke RJ
        • Stabler P
        • Walton C
        • et al.
        Is more intensive better? Client and service provider outcomes for intensive versus standard therapy schedules for functional voice disorders.
        J Voice. 2014; 28: 652.e31-652.e43https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.02.005
        • Wenke RJ
        • Lawrie M
        • Hobson T
        • et al.
        Feasibility and cost analysis of implementing high intensity aphasia clinics within a sub-acute setting.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014; 16: 250-259https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2014.887777
        • Gunning D
        • Wenke RJ
        • Ward EC
        • et al.
        Clinicians’ perceptions of delivering new models of high intensity aphasia treatment.
        Aphasiology. 2017; 31: 406-426https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1236359
        • Roy N.
        Optimal dose–response relationships in voice therapy.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 14: 419-423https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2012.686119
        • Wylie K
        • Barrett J
        • Besser M
        • et al.
        Good practice guidelines for the assessment and treatment of adults with gender dysphoria.
        Sex Relatsh Ther. 2014; 29: 154-214https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.883353
      3. International Commission of Jurists. The Yogyakarta principles plus 10 - additional principles and state obligation on the application of international human rights law in relation to sexual orientation, gender expression and sex characteristics to complement the Yogyakarta principles; 2017. http://yogyakartaprinciples.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/A5_yogyakartaWEB-2.pdf

        • Quinn S
        • Swain N
        Efficacy of intensive voice feminization therapy in a transgender young offender.
        J Commun Disord. 2018; 72: 1-15https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCOMDIS.2018.02.001
        • De Bodt M
        • Patteeuw T
        • Versele A.
        Temporal variables in voice therapy.
        J Voice. 2015; 29: 611-617https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.12.001
        • Leung Y
        • Oates J
        • Chan SP.
        Voice, articulation and prosody contribute to listener perceptions of speaker gender: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018; 61: 266-297https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0067
        • Nasser Kotby M
        The Accent Method of Voice Therapy. 1. Singular P., 1995
        • Titze IR.
        Voice training and therapy with a semi-occluded vocal tract: rationale and scientific underpinnings.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49: 448-459https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/035
        • Stemple JC
        • Lee L
        • D'Amico B
        • Pickup B.
        Efficacy of vocal function exercises as a method of improving voice production.
        J Voice. 1994; 8: 271-278https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(05)80299-1
        • Yiu EML
        • Lo MCM
        • Barrett EA.
        A systematic review of resonant voice therapy.
        Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017; 19: 17-29https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2016.1226953
        • International Phonetic Association
        Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet.
        Cambridge University Press, 1999
      4. Australian/New Zealand Standard. Acoustics - Recommended design sound levels and reverberation times for building interiors; 2016. https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-au/Standards/AS-NZS-2107-2016-1882409/

        • Patel RR
        • Awan SN
        • Barkmeier-Kraemer J
        • et al.
        Recommended protocols for instrumental assessment of voice: American speech-language-hearing association expert panel to develop a protocol for instrumental assessment of vocal function.
        Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2018; 27: 887-905https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-17-0009
        • Švec JG
        • Granqvist S.
        Tutorial and guidelines on measurement of sound pressure level (SPL) in voice and speech.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018; 61: 441-461https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0095
      5. Audacity [Computer software]. Version 2.2.2. Audacity Team; 1999-2018. http://audacity.sourceforge.net/

      6. Stachler RJ, Francis DO, Schwartz SR, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) (Update). Vol 158.; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817751030

        • Maryn Y
        • De Bodt M
        • Roy N
        The acoustic voice quality index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders.
        J Commun Disord. 2010; 43: 161-174https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004
        • Boersma P.
        Acoustic analysis.
        in: Podesva RJ Sharma D Research Methods in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, 2014: 375-398
        • MATLAB [Computer software]
        Version 7.10.0 (R2010a). Natick.
        The MathWorks Inc., Massachusetts2010
      7. RecVox [Computer software]. Version 0.0.0.20. Tolvan Data; 2020.

        • Boersma P.
        Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer.
        Glot Int. 2001; 5: 341-347https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31821473f7
        • Van Borsel J
        • Baeck H.
        The voice in transsexuals.
        Logop Foniatría y Audiol. 2014; 34: 40-48
        • Cosyns M
        • Van Borsel J
        • Wierckx K
        • et al.
        Voice in female-to-male transsexual persons after long-term androgen therapy.
        Laryngoscope. 2014; 124: 1409-1414https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24480
        • Hwa Chen S
        Sex differences in frequency and intensity in reading and voice range profiles for Taiwanese adult speakers.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2006; 59: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1159/000096545
        • Herbst CT
        • Hertegard S
        • Zangger-Borch D
        • et al.
        Freddie Mercury—acoustic analysis of speaking fundamental frequency, vibrato, and subharmonics.
        Logop Phoniatr Vocol. 2017; 42: 29-38https://doi.org/10.3109/14015439.2016.1156737
        • Barsties B
        • Maryn Y.
        The improvement of internal consistency of the acoustic voice quality index.
        Am J Otolaryngol - Head Neck Med Surg. 2015; 36: 647-656https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.04.012
        • Uloza V
        • Latoszek BB V.
        • Ulozaite-Staniene N
        • et al.
        A comparison of dysphonia severity index and acoustic voice quality index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
        Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 2018; 275: 1-10https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x
        • Barsties B
        • Maryn Y.
        External validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 with Extended Representativity.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2016; 125: 571-583https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489416636131
        • Barsties v
        • Latoszek B
        • Ulozaitė-Stanienė N
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of dysphonia classification of DSI and AVQI.
        Laryngoscope. 2019; 129: 692-698https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27350
        • Maryn Y
        • De Bodt M
        • Roy N.
        The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders.
        J Commun Disord. 2010; 43: 161-174https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004
        • Fairbanks G.
        Voice and Articulation Drillbook.
        2nd ed. Harper and Row, 1960
        • Carew L
        • Dacakis G
        • Oates J.
        The effectiveness of oral resonance therapy on the perception of femininity of voice in male-to-female transsexuals.
        J Voice. 2007; 21: 591-603https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.05.005
        • Hancock AB
        • Helenius L.
        Adolescent male-to-female transgender voice and communication therapy.
        J Commun Disord. 2012; 45: 313-324https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.06.008
        • Dacakis G
        • Oates J
        • Douglas JM.
        Further evidence of the construct validity of the transsexual voice questionnaire (TVQMtF) using principal components analysis.
        J Voice. 2017; 31: 142-148https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.001
        • Kozee HB
        • Tylka TL
        • Bauerband LA.
        Measuring transgender individuals’ comfort with gender identity and appearance: development and validation of the transgender congruence scale.
        Psychol Women Q. 2012; 36: 179-196https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684312442161
        • Robson P.
        Development of a new self-report questionnaire to measure self esteem.
        Psychol Med. 1989; 19: 513-518https://doi.org/10.1017/S003329170001254X
        • Fugl-Meyer AR
        • Melin R
        • Fugl-Meyer KS
        Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: In relation to gender, age, partner and immigrant status.
        J Rehabil Med. 2002; 34: 239-246https://doi.org/10.1080/165019702760279242
        • Melin R
        • Fugl-Meyer KS
        • Fugl-Meyer AR.
        Life satisfaction in 18-to 64-year-old Swedes: In relation to education, employment situation, health and physical activity.
        J Rehabil Med. 2003; 35: 84-90https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970306119
        • Cohen S
        • Kamarck T
        • Mermelstein R.
        A global measure of perceived stress.
        J Heal Soc Behav. 1983; 24: 385-396https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
        • Zigmond AS
        • Snaith RP.
        The hospital anxiety and depression scale.
        Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983; 67: 361-370
        • Quinn S
        • Oates J
        • Dacakis G.
        Perceived gender and client satisfaction in transgender voice work: comparing self and listener rating scales across a training program.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2021; (Published online): 1-16https://doi.org/10.1159/000521226
        • Meerschman I
        • Van Lierde K
        • Peeters K
        • et al.
        Short-term effect of two semi-occluded vocal tract training programs on the vocal quality of future occupational voice users: “resonant voice training using nasal consonants” versus “straw phonation.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017; 60: 2519-2536https://doi.org/10.23959/sfahrj-1000001
        • Pinheiro J
        • Bates D
        • Härdle W.
        Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS.
        Springer, 2010
        • Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models (nlme)
        [R software package].
        R Core Team, 2021 (Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D)
      8. R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer Software]. Versions R3.6.3-R4.1.12. R Core Team; 2020-2021.

      9. Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means (emmeans). [R software package]. Lenth R, Buerkner P, Herve M, Love J, Riebl H, Singmann H; 2021. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html

        • Lenth R.
        Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans.
        J. Stat. Softw. 2016; 69: 1-33https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v069.i01
        • Gelfer MP
        • Tice RM.
        Perceptual and acoustic outcomes of voice therapy for male-to-female transgender individuals immediately after therapy and 15 months later.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 335-347https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.009
        • Pausewang Gelfer M
        • Van Dong BR
        A preliminary study on the use of vocal function exercises to improve voice in male-to-female transgender clients.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 321-334https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.07.008
        • Dacakis G.
        Long-term maintenance of fundamental frequency increases in male-to-female transsexuals.
        J Voice. 2000; 14: 549-556https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80010-7
        • Hancock AB
        • Garabedian LM.
        Transgender voice and communication treatment: a retrospective chart review of 25 cases.
        Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2013; 48: 54-65https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2012.00185.x
        • Mészáros K
        • Vitéz LC
        • Szabolcs I
        • et al.
        Efficacy of conservative voice treatment in male-to-female transsexuals.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2005; 57: 111-118https://doi.org/10.1159/000083572
        • Söderpalm E
        • Larsson A
        • Almquist SA.
        Evaluation of a consecutive group of transsexual individuals referred for vocal intervention in the west of sweden.
        Logop Phonatrics Vocology. 2004; 29: 18-30https://doi.org/10.1080/14015430310021618
        • Iwarsson J
        • Morris DJ
        • Balling LW.
        Cognitive load in voice therapy carry-over exercises.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017; 60: 1-12https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-S-15-0235
        • Reynolds V
        • Buckland A
        • Bailey J
        • et al.
        Objective assessment of pediatric voice disorders with the acoustic voice quality index.
        J Voice. 2012; 26: 672.e1-672.e7https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.02.002
        • Hancock AB
        • Krissinger J
        • Owen K.
        Voice perceptions and quality of life of transgender people.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 553-558https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.07.013
        • McNeill EJM
        • Wilson JA
        • Clark S
        • et al.
        Perception of voice in the transgender client.
        J Voice. 2008; 22: 727-733https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.12.010
        • Holmberg EB
        • Oates J
        • Dacakis G
        • et al.
        Phonetograms, aerodynamic measurements, self-evaluations, and auditory perceptual ratings of male-to-female transsexual voice.
        J Voice. 2010; 24: 511-522https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.02.002
        • Owen K
        • Hancock AB.
        The role of self- and listener perceptions of femininity in voice therapy.
        Int J Transgenderism. 2010; 12: 272-284https://doi.org/10.1080/15532739.2010.550767
        • Haskell JA
        • Baken RJ.
        Self perception of speaking pitch levels.
        J Speech Hear Disord. 1978; 43: 3-8https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4301.03
        • Lader M
        • Marks I.
        Clinical Anxiety.
        Elsevier Science & Technology, 1971
        • Shefcik G
        • Tsai PT.
        Voice-related Experiences of Nonbinary Individuals (VENI) development and content validity.
        J Voice. 2021; (Published online)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2020.12.037
        • Leung Y
        • Oates J
        • Chan SP
        • et al.
        Associations between speaking fundamental frequency, vowel formant frequencies, and listener perceptions of speaker gender and vocal femininity–masculinity.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; 64: 2600-2622
        • Hancock AB
        • Pool SF.
        Influence of listener characteristics on perceptions of sex and gender.
        J Lang Soc Psychol. 2017; 36: 599-610https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17704460
        • Zraick RI
        • Skaggs SD
        • Montague JC
        The effect of task on determination of habitual pitch.
        J Voice. 2000; 14 (In press): 484-489https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(00)80005-3