Advertisement

Systematic Review of Literature on Prevalence of Vocal Fatigue Among Teachers

  • Milena Moreno
    Affiliations
    Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana, Department Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bogotá Colombia

    Vocology Center, Bogotá, Colombia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Carlos Calvache
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to Corporacion Universitaria Iberoamericana, Department Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bogotá, Cundinamarca, Colombia.
    Affiliations
    Corporación Universitaria Iberoamericana, Department Communication Sciences and Disorders, Bogotá Colombia

    Vocology Center, Bogotá, Colombia
    Search for articles by this author
  • Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva
    Affiliations
    Vocology Center, Bogotá, Colombia

    Department of Collective Health, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia

    Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, Michigan State University, MICH
    Search for articles by this author
Published:September 19, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.07.029

      Summary

      Background

      Previous results suggest that teaching is a high-risk profession for developing voice disorders.

      Objective

      This study aims to determine the prevalence of vocal fatigue among teachers and its relationship with voice acoustic parameters reported in previous studies.

      Method

      Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement Guidelines, we performed a systematic literature review including five databases: Scopus, Scielo, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Web of Science. Information on study population, definition and evaluation of vocal fatigue, and teaching characteristics were extracted from each paper. The quality of the included publications was assessed using the “Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies”.

      Results

      In total, 14 publications met the inclusion criteria. The two most common work-related factors of vocal fatigue were high levels of noise inside classrooms and loud speaking voice use. Some investigations reported voice acoustic parameters such as fundamental frequency and vocal Sound Pressure Levels as associated with vocal fatigue.

      Conclusion

      Vocal fatigue is a prevalent symptom among teachers associated with teaching vocal demands. However, studies on objective parameters that complement self-reports, to quantify vocal fatigue are needed to determine permissible values for healthy occupational voice use.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Seifpanahi S
        • Izadi F
        • Jamshidi AA
        • et al.
        Prevalence of voice disorders and associated risk factors in teachers and nonteachers in Iran.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2016; 30 (506.e19-23)
        • Titze IR
        • Lemke J
        • Montequin D.
        Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 1997; 11: 254-259
        • Angelillo M
        • Di Maio G
        • Costa G
        • et al.
        Prevalence of occupational voice disorders in teachers.
        J Prev Med Hyg. 2009; 50: 26-32
        • Roy N
        • Merrill RM
        • Thibeault S
        • et al.
        Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR. 2004; 47: 281-293
      1. de Alvear RB, Martínez-Arquero G. Teachers’ voice disorders collateral effects. 2009;8.

        • Cantor Cutiva LC
        • Burdorf A
        Factors associated with voice-related quality of life among teachers with voice complaints.
        J Commun Disord. 2014; 52: 134-142
        • Mora Pino KM
        • Clavijo Rocha FJ
        • Galdames Durán SP
        • et al.
        Contexto ocupacional, abuso y mal uso vocal en profesores de la ciudad de iquique.
        Cienc Amp Trab. 2018; 20: 116-120
        • Hazlett DE
        • Duffy OM
        • Moorhead SA.
        Review of the impact of voice training on the vocal quality of professional voice users: implications for vocal health and recommendations for further research.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 181-191
        • Rabelo ATV
        • Santos JN
        • Souza BO
        • et al.
        The influence of noise on the vocal dose in women.
        J Voice. 2019; 33: 214-219
        • McCabe DJ
        • Titze IR.
        Chant therapy for treating vocal fatigue among public school teachers: a preliminary study.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2002; 11: 356-369
        • Cohn JR
        • Spiegel JR
        • Sataloff RT.
        Vocal disorders and the professional voice user: the allergist's role.
        Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995; 74: 363-376
        • Sala E
        • Airo E
        • Olkinuora P
        • et al.
        Vocal loading among day care center teachers.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2002; 27: 21-28
        • Cutiva LCC
        • Burdorf A.
        Effects of noise and acoustics in schools on vocal health in teachers.
        Noise Health. 2015; 17: 17-22
        • Kristiansen J
        • Lund SP
        • Persson R
        • et al.
        The effects of acoustical refurbishment of classrooms on teachers’ perceived noise exposure and noise-related health symptoms.
        Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2016; 89: 341-350
        • Mota AF de B
        • Pellicani AD
        • Dornelas R
        • et al.
        Vocal teacher production condition in differents functional situations.
        CoDAS. SciELO Brasil. 2022; 34: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20202020208
        • Lin S
        • Lipton E
        • Lu Y
        • et al.
        Are classroom thermal conditions, lighting, and acoustics related to teacher health symptoms?.
        Indoor Air. 2020; 30: 544-552https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12640
      2. Thomas H, Ciliska D, Dobbins M. Quality assessment tool for quantitative studies. 2003.

        • Hunter EJ
        • Banks RE.
        Gender differences in the reporting of vocal fatigue in teachers as quantified by the vocal fatigue index.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2017; 126: 813-818
        • Santos G
        • Leonardo A
        • Mendes J
        • et al.
        Vocal fatigue in professors at the beginning and end of the school year.
        CoDAS. 2019; 32e20180233
        • Moghtader M
        • Soltani M
        • Mehravar M
        • et al.
        The relationship between vocal fatigue index and voice handicap index in university professors with and without voice complaint.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2020; 34: 809.e1-809.e5
        • Devadas U
        • Bellur R
        • Maruthy S.
        Prevalence and risk factors of voice problems among primary school teachers in india.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2017; 31 (117.e1-117.e10)
        • Rantala L
        • Paavola L
        • Korkko P
        • et al.
        Working-day effects on the spectral characteristics of teaching voice.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop Off Organ Int Assoc Logop Phoniatr IALP. 1998; 50: 205-211
        • Kankare E
        • Geneid A
        • Laukkanen AM
        • et al.
        Subjective evaluation of voice and working conditions and phoniatric examination in kindergarten teachers.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop Off Organ Int Assoc Logop Phoniatr IALP. 2012; 64: 12-19
        • Herndon NE
        • Sundarrajan A
        • Sivasankar MP
        • et al.
        Respiratory and laryngeal function in teachers: pre and postvocal loading challenge.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2019; 33: 302-309
        • Escalona E.
        Prevalencia de síntomas de alteraciones de la voz y condiciones de trabajo en docentes de escuela primaria: Aragua-Venezuela.
        Salud Los Trab. 2006; 14: 31-54
        • Pizolato RA
        • Mialhe FL
        • Cortellazzi KL
        • et al.
        Avaliação dos fatores de risco para distúrbios de voz em professores e análise acústica vocal como instrumento de avaliação epidemiológica.
        Rev CEFAC. 2013; 15: 957-966
        • Halpern AE
        • Spielman JL
        • Hunter EJ
        • et al.
        The inability to produce soft voice (IPSV): a tool to detect vocal change in school-teachers.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2009; 34: 117-127
        • Godall P
        • Gassull C
        • Godoy A
        • et al.
        Epidemiological voice health map of the teaching population of Granollers (Barcelona) developed from the EVES questionnaire and the VHI.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2015; 40: 171-178
        • Dornelas R
        • da Silva K
        • Carregosa ES
        • et al.
        Relação entre a função glótica e a desvantagem vocal em professores da rede pública de ensino.
        Rev CEFAC. 2017; 19: 303-307
        • Menon UK
        • Raj M
        • Antony L
        • et al.
        Prevalence of voice disorders in school teachers in a district in south india.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2021; 35: 1-8
        • Preciado-Lopez J
        • Perez-Fernandez C
        • Calzada-Uriondo M
        • et al.
        Epidemiological study of voice disorders among teaching professionals of La Rioja, Spain.
        J Voice Off J Voice Found. 2008; 22: 489-508
        • Hunter EJ
        • Titze IR.
        Quantifying vocal fatigue recovery: Dynamic vocal recovery trajectories after a vocal loading exercise.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2009; 118: 449-460
        • Hunter EJ
        • Cantor-Cutiva LC
        • van Leer E
        • et al.
        Toward a consensus description of vocal effort, vocal load, vocal loading, and vocal fatigue.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res JSLHR. 2020; 63: 509-532
        • Stemple JC
        • Roy N
        • Klaben BK.
        Clinical Voice Pathology: Theory and Management, Sixth Edition.
        Plural Publishing, 2018: 130-133
        • Xue C
        • Kang J
        • Hedberg C
        • et al.
        Dynamically monitoring vocal fatigue and recovery using aerodynamic, acoustic, and subjective self-rating measurements.
        J Voice. 2019; 33 (809.e11-809.e18.)
        • D'haeseleer E.
        • Behlau M.
        • Bruneel L.
        • et al.
        Factors involved in vocal fatigue: a pilot study.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop Off Organ Int Assoc Logop Phoniatr IALP. 2016; 68: 112-118
        • Vilkman E.
        Occupational safety and health aspects of voice and speech professions.
        Folia Phoniatr Logop Off Organ Int Assoc Logop Phoniatr IALP. 2004; 56: 220-253