Advertisement

Exploring Personality and Perceived Present Control as Factors in Postsurgical Voice Rest: A Case Comparison

Published:January 11, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.12.014

      Summary

      Objective

      This case comparison explored the relation between personality, perceived present control, and postoperative voice rest (as estimated by self-report and objective voice use) following surgery for benign vocal fold lesions.

      Method

      Two participants were included. Both participants were diagnosed with benign vocal fold pathology, underwent phonosurgery, and were assigned to either complete voice rest (CVR) or relative voice rest (RVR) postoperatively. During voice rest (VR), a visual analog scale (VAS) and a dosimeter (the Vocalog2) were used daily to estimate self-perceived and objective voice use, respectively. The participants also completed questionnaires on voice-related demographics, the Voice Handicap Index (VHI), Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI), and Perceived Present Control (PPC). After 7 days of CVR or RVR, participants completed a postoperative questionnaire and a final VAS for overall voice use.

      Results

      A wide discrepancy was observed in one of two participant's subjective perception of voice use (using the VAS) versus objective dosimetry data wherein she reported significantly more voice use than was observed objectively. Differences in personality and PPC between the participants did not appear to affect their voice use following the VR protocols.

      Conclusion

      The amount of voice use in both VR protocols for these two participants suggests that personality and PPC did not affect their adherence to recommendations of VR. Patients may perceive their voice use differently across time, which might play a role in their adherence to voice rest recommendations: voice use measured as instances versus a unit of time (seconds).

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Martins RH
        • do Amaral HA
        • Tavares EL
        • et al.
        Voice disorders: etiology and diagnosis.
        J Voice. 2016; 30: 761.e1-761.e9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.09.017
        • Herrington-Hall BL
        • Lee L
        • Stemple JC
        • et al.
        Description of laryngeal pathologies by age, sex, and occupation in a treatment-seeking sample.
        J Speech Hear Disord. 1988; 53: 57-64https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5301.57
        • Boone D
        • McFarlane S
        • Von Berg S
        • et al.
        The Voice and Voice Therapy.
        10th ed. Pearson, Hoboken, NJ2019
        • Etter NM
        • Stemple JC
        • Howell DM
        Defining the lived experience of older adults with voice disorders.
        J Voice. 2013; 27: 61-67
        • Hansen JK
        • Thibeault SL.
        Current understanding and review of the literature: vocal fold scarring.
        J Voice. 2006; 20: 110-120
        • Hirano S.
        Current treatment of vocal fold scarring.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13: 143-147
        • Koufman JA
        • David Blalock P
        Is voice rest never indicated?.
        J Voice. 1989; 3: 87-91
      1. White AC, Carding P. Pre- and postoperative voice therapy for benign bocal fold lesions: factors influencing a complex intervention. J Voice. 2020;Jan;36(1):59–67

        • Rousseau B
        • Hirano S
        • Chan RW
        • et al.
        Characterization of chronic vocal fold scarring in a rabbit model.
        J Voice. 2004; 18: 116-124
        • Rousseau B
        • Hirano S
        • Scheidt TD
        • et al.
        Characterization of vocal fold scarring in a canine model.
        Laryngoscope. 2003; 113: 620-627
        • Rousseau B
        • Sohn J
        • Montequin DW
        • et al.
        Functional outcomes of reduced hyaluronan in acute vocal fold scar.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2004; 113: 767-776
        • Thibeault SL
        • Gray SD
        • Bless DM
        • et al.
        Histologic and rheologic characterization of vocal fold scarring.
        J Voice. 2002; 16: 96-104
        • Coombs AC
        • Carswell AJ
        • Tierney PA
        Voice rest after vocal fold surgery: current practice and evidence.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2013; 127: 773-779
        • Dhaliwal SS
        • Doyle PC
        • Failla S
        • et al.
        Role of voice rest following laser resection of vocal fold lesions: a randomized controlled trial.
        Laryngoscope. 2020; 130: 1750-1755
        • Divakaran S
        • Alexander A
        • Vijayakumar S
        • et al.
        Voice outcome following carbon dioxide laser assisted microlaryngeal surgery.
        Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 67: 361-365
        • Joshi A
        • Johns MM
        Current practices for voice rest recommendations after phonomicrosurgery.
        Laryngoscope. 2018; 128: 1170-1175
        • Whitling S
        • Lyberg-Åhlander V
        • Rydell R
        Absolute or relative voice rest after phonosurgery: a blind randomized prospective clinical trial.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018; 43: 143-154
        • Rihkanen H
        • Geneid A
        Voice rest and sick leave after phonosurgical procedures: surveys among European laryngologists and phoniatricians.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 276: 483-487
        • Misono S
        • Banks K
        • Gaillard P
        • et al.
        The clinical utility of vocal dosimetry for assessing voice rest.
        Laryngoscope. 2015; 125: 171-176
        • Rihkanen H
        • Geneid A.
        Voice rest and sick leave after phonosurgical procedures: surveys among European laryngologists and phoniatricians.
        Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 276: 483-487https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05283-1
        • Slavych BK
        • Zraick RI
        • Bursac Z
        • et al.
        An investigation of the relationship between adherence to voice therapy for muscle tension dysphonia and employment, social support, and life satisfaction.
        J Voice. 2021; 35: 386-393https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2019.10.015
        • Toles LE
        • Roy N
        • Sogg S
        • et al.
        Relationships among personality, daily speaking voice use, and phonotrauma in adult female singers.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2021; 64: 4580-4598https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00274
        • Van Stan JH
        • Maffei M
        • Masson MLV
        • et al.
        Self-ratings of vocal status in daily life: reliability and validity for patients with vocal hyperfunction and a normative group.
        Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2017; 26: 1167-1177https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-17-0031
        • Rousseau B
        • Cohen SM
        • Zeller AS
        • et al.
        Compliance and quality of life in patients on prescribed voice rest.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 144: 104-107
        • Gosling S
        • Rentfrow P
        • Swann W
        A very brief measure of the big five personality domains.
        J Res Pers. 2003; 37: 504-528
        • Goldberg LR
        The structure of phenotypic personality traits.
        Amer Psych. 1993; 48: 26-34
        • John OP.
        The “Big Five” factor taxonomy: dimension of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires.
        in: Pervin LA Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. Guilford Press (New York City, NY), 1990: 66-100
        • Roy N
        • Bless DM.
        Personality traits and psychological factors in voice pathology: a foundation for future research.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000; 43: 737-748https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4303.737
        • Frazier P
        • Merians A
        • Misono S.
        Perceived control and voice handicap in patients with voice disorders.
        Health Psych. 2017; 36: 1105-1108
        • Nguyen-Feng VN
        • Frazier PA
        • Roy N
        • et al.
        Perceived control, voice handicap, and barriers to voice therapy.
        J Voice. 2021; 35: 326.e313-326.e319
        • Nsamenang SA
        • Hirsch JK.
        Positive psychological determinants of treatment adherence among primary care patients.
        Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015; 16: 398-406https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423614000292
        • Roy N
        • Bless DM
        • Heisey D
        Personality and voice disorders: a superfactor trait analysis.
        J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000; 43: 749-768https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4303.749
        • Roy N
        • Bless
        DM Toward a theory of the dispositional bases of functional dysphonia and vocal nodules: exploring the role of personality and emotional adjustment.
        in: Kent RD Ball MJ The Handbook of Voice Quality Measurement. Singular Publishing Group, Norwich, England2000: 461-480
        • Free N
        • Stemple JC
        • Smith JA
        • et al.
        The impact of a vocal loading task on voice characteristics of female speakers with benign vocal fold lesions.
        J Voice. 2021; ([published online ahead of print, 2021 Dec 23]) (S0892-1997(21)00396-9)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.11.009
        • Nguyen-Feng VN
        • Frazier PA
        • Stockness A
        • et al.
        Web-based perceived present control intervention for voice disorders: a pilot study.
        J Voice. 2020; 34: 300.e1-300.e9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.08.006
        • Rousseau B
        • Gutmann ML
        • Mau T
        • et al.
        Randomized controlled trial of supplemental augmentative and alternative communication versus voice rest alone after phonomicrosurgery.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015; 152: 494-500
        • King RE
        • Dailey SH
        • Thibeault SL.
        Role of voice therapy in adherence to voice rest after office-based vocal fold procedures.
        Amer J Sp-Lang Path. 2021; : 1-12