Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

Postoperative Voice Surgical Outcomes in Professional Singers vs Non-Singers

Published:February 04, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.12.021

      Summary

      Objectives

      Professional singers often are described as vocal athletes, and just as professional athletes get injured, injuries to professional singers can occur during practice and performances. In other fields of medicine, research has shown that competitive sports athletes recover more quickly after orthopedic surgical procedures compared to non-athletes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether similar differences occur with voice patients by comparing voice surgical outcomes between professional singers and non-singers.

      Methods

      A retrospective cohort study was conducted that included a consecutive sample of 194 adult subjects who underwent voice surgical procedures in the operating room. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon, the senior author of this study (RTS). Data were reviewed for patients with medical records between January 1, 2010 to February 1, 2022. Subjects who reported receiving income from singing or reported studying voice at a collegiate level or higher were classified as professional singers. Subjects reporting careers in all other professions, including unpaid avocational singers or singers without formal training, were assigned to the non-singer control group. The data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Statistical significance was determined using independent samples t test for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test or binary logistic regression for binary outcomes.

      Results

      There were 194 subjects included in this study (43.81% male/56.19% female). The average age was 42.60 ± 15.17. Ninety subjects were professional singers and 104 were non-singers. Revision of surgical plan was significantly different for professional singers compared to non-singers (14.44% versus 0%, P < 0.001). The rate of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the singer and non-singer groups, even when adjusting for other factors. Professional singers presented with slightly more severe vocal fold hemorrhages on the first postoperative visit compared to non-singers (1.73 ± 0.73 versus 1.32 ± 0.65, P = 0.003), but there was no difference by the second visit. Following surgery, professional singers adhered to a longer duration of voice rest. However, both groups participated equally in voice therapy postoperatively.

      Conclusions

      No differences were found in operative complications between professional singers and non-singers. This study describes outcomes and considerations in patient care for professional singers. It also provides insight into potentially modifiable factors, such as voice rest, that could impact patient care postoperatively.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Sataloff RT.
        Professional singers: the science and art of clinical care.
        Am J Otolaryngol. 1981; 2: 251-266
        • Sataloff RT.
        Introduction.
        in: Sataloff RT. Professional voice: the science and art of clinical care. 4th Edition. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2017: 3-7
        • Sataloff RT
        • Sataloff JB
        • Hawkshaw MJ.
        Care of the professional voice.
        in: Fried M Tan M Clinical Laryngology The Essentials. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart2015: 151-167
        • Timmermans B
        • Vanderwegen J
        • De Bodt MS.
        Outcome of vocal hygiene in singers.
        Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005; 13: 138-142
        • Clapp IM
        • Nwachukwu BU
        • Beck EC
        • et al.
        Comparing outcomes of competitive athletes versus nonathletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
        Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 159-166
        • Peppard RC
        • Bless DM
        • Milenkovic P.
        Comparison of young adult singers and nonsingers with vocal nodules.
        J Voice. 1988; 2: 250-260
        • Rendon MdMR
        • Ermakova T
        • Freymann M-L
        • et al.
        Efficacy of phonosurgery, logopedic voice treatment and vocal pedagogy in common voice problems of singers.
        Adv Ther. 2018; 35: 1069-1086
        • Zeitels SM
        • Hillman RE
        • Mauri M
        • et al.
        Phonomicrosurgery in singers and performing artists: treatment outcomes, management theories, and future directions.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2002; 111: 21-40
        • Yiu EM-L
        • Chan RM.
        Effect of hydration and vocal rest on the vocal fatigue in amateur karaoke singers.
        J Voice. 2003; 17: 216-227
        • Jamal N
        • Berke G.
        Principles of phonosurgery.
        in: Fried M Tan M Clinical Laryngology The Essentials. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart2015
        • Rubin AD
        • Codino J.
        The art of caring for the professional singer.
        Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019; 52: 769-778
        • Sataloff RT
        • Castell DO
        • Katz PO
        Reflux and other gastroenterologic conditions that may affect the voice.
        in: Sataloff RT Professional Voice: The Science and Art of Clinical Care. 4th Edition. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2017: 907-969
        • Zeitels SM.
        The art and craft of phonomicrosurgery in grammy award–winning elite performers.
        Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2019; 128: 7S-24S
        • Behrman A
        • Sulica L.
        Voice rest after microlaryngoscopy: current opinion and practice.
        Laryngoscope. 2003; 113: 2182-2186
        • Coombs AC
        • Carswell AJ
        • Tierney PA.
        Voice rest after vocal fold surgery: current practice and evidence.
        J Laryngol Otol. 2013; 127: 773-779
        • Kaneko M
        • Shiromoto O
        • Fujiu-Kurachi M
        • et al.
        Optimal duration for voice rest after vocal fold surgery: randomized controlled clinical study.
        J Voice. 2016; 31: 97-103
        • Whitling S
        • Lyberg-Åhlander V
        • Rydell R.
        Absolute or relative voice rest after phonosurgery: a blind randomized prospective clinical trial.
        Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2018; 43: 143-154
        • Rosen CA
        • Lee AS
        • Osborne J
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10.
        Laryngoscope. 2004; 114: 1549-1556
        • Abibtol J
        • Sataloff RT.
        Laryngeal Laser Surgery.
        in: Sataloff RT. Professional Voice: The Science and Art of Clinical Care. 4th Edition. Plural Publishing, San Diego, CA2017: 1501-1520
        • Krausert CR
        • Olszewski AE
        • Taylor LN
        • et al.
        Mucosal wave measurement and visualization techniques.
        J Voice. 2011; 25: 395-405