Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 3, ISSUE 4, P294-305, December 1989

Glottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in low, normal, and high pitch

  • Eva B. Holmberg
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence and reprint requests to E. B. Holmberg at Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Bldg. 36, Rm. 521, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A.
    Affiliations
    Department of Communication Disorders, Boston University, Boston, U.S.A.

    Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

    Department of Phonetics, Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
    Search for articles by this author
  • Robert E. Hillman
    Affiliations
    Department of Communication Disorders, Boston University, Boston, U.S.A.

    Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joseph S. Perkell
    Affiliations
    Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
      This paper is only available as a PDF. To read, Please Download here.

      Summary

      Measurements on the inverse filtered airflow waveform and of estimated average transglottal pressure and glottal airflow were made from syllable sequences in low, normal, and high pitch for 25 male and 20 female speakers. Correlation analyses indicated that several of the airflow measurements were more directly related to voice intensity than to fundamental frequency (F0). Results suggested that pressure may have different influences in low and high pitch in this speech task. It is suggested that unexpected results of increased pressure in low pitch were related to maintaining voice quality, that is, avoiding vocal fry. In high pitch, the increased pressure may serve to maintain vocal fold vibration. The findings suggested different underlying laryngeal mechanisms and vocal adjustments for increasing and decreasing F0 from normal pitch.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Voice
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Holmberg EB
        • Hillman RE
        • Perkell JS
        Glottal airflow and transglottal pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal and loud voice.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1988; 84: 511-529
      1. Hillman RE, Holmberg EB, Perkell JS, Walsh M, Vaughan C. Objective assessment of vocal hyperfunction: an experimental framework and initial results. J Speech Hear Res (in press).

        • van den Berg JW
        Sub-glottal pressure and vibration of the vocal folds.
        Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1957; 9: 65-71
        • Kunze L
        Investigation of changes of subglottal pressure and rate of airflow accompanying change of F0, intensity, vowels and voice registers in adult male speakers [Dissertation].
        in: State University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa1962: 1-119
        • Ladefoged P
        Some physiological parameters in speech.
        Lang Speech. 1963; 6: 109-119
        • Stevens KN
        Theory of vocal-cord vibration and its relation to laryngeal features.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1973; 55: 383(A)
        • Stevens KN
        Vibration modes in relation to model parameters.
        in: Stevens KN Hirano M Vocal fold physiology. Proceedings of the vocal fold physiology conference, Kurume, Japan. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo1981: 291-301
        • Hirano M
        • Ohala J
        • Vennard W
        The function of laryngeal muscles in regulating fundamental frequency and intensity of phonation.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1969; 12: 616-628
        • Hixon T
        • Klatt DH
        • Mead J
        Influence of forced transglottal pressure changes on vocal fundamental frequency.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1971; 49: 105(A)
        • Shipp T
        • McGlone R
        Laryngeal dynamics associated with voice frequency change.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1971; 14: 761-767
        • Collier R
        Physiological correlates of intonation patterns.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1975; 58: 249-255
        • Atkinson JE
        Correlation analysis of the physiological factors controlling fundamental voice frequency.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1978; 63: 211-222
        • Baer T
        Reflex activation of laryngeal muscles by sudden induced subglottal pressure changes.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1979; 65: 1271-1275
        • Titze IR
        • Durham PL
        Passive mechanisms influencing fundamental frequency control.
        in: Baer T Sasaki C Harris K Laryngeal function in phonation and respiration. Proceedings from vocal fold physiology conference, New Haven, Connecticut, 1985. Little Brown & Co., Inc., Boston1987: 304-319
        • Hollien H
        In search of vocal fold frequency mechanisms.
        in: Bless DM Abbs JH Vocal fold physiology: contemporary research and clinical issues. Proceedings from vocal fold physiology conference, Madison, Wisconsin. College-Hill Press, Inc., San Diego, California1981: 361-367
        • Stevens KN
        Physics of laryngeal behavior and larynx modes.
        Phonetica. 1977; 34: 264-279
        • Hollien H
        • Colton RH
        Four laminagraphic studies of vocal fold thickness.
        Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1969; 21: 179-198
        • Hollien H
        • Coleman RF
        Laryngeal correlates of frequency change: a STROL study.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1970; 13: 271-278
        • Schutte HK
        The efficiency of voice production.
        in: Kemper, Groningen1981: 1-192
        • Rothenberg MR
        A new inverse-filtering technique for deriving the glottal air flow waveform during voicing.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1973; 53: 1632-1645
        • Smitheran JR
        • Hixon TJ
        A clinical method for estimating laryngeal airway resistance during vowel production.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1981; 46: 138-146
        • Lofqvist A
        • Carlborg B
        • Kitzing P
        Initial validation of an indirect measure of subglottal pressure during vowels.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1982; 72: 633-634
        • Tanaka S
        • Gould WJ
        Relationships between vocal intensity and noninvasively obtained aerodynamic parameters in normal subjects.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73: 1316-1321
        • Hirano M
        Clinical examination of voice.
        Springer-Verlag, New York1981
        • Rothenberg MR
        Measurements of airflow in speech.
        J Speech Hear Res. 1977; 20: 155-176
        • Sundberg J
        • Gauffin J
        Waveform and spectrum of the glottal voice source.
        in: Ohman S Lindblom B Frontiers of speech communication. Academic Press, London1979: 301-322
        • Isshiki N
        Vocal efficiency index.
        in: Stevens KN Hirano M Vocal fold physiology. Proceedings of the vocal fold physiology conference, Kurume, Japan. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo1981: 193-208
        • Winer BJ
        Statistical principles in experimental design.
        in: McGraw-Hill, New York1971: 1-905
        • Tabachnick BG
        • Fidell LS
        Using multivariate statistics.
        in: Harper and Row, San Francisco1983: 1-507
        • Rothenberg MR
        Source-tract acoustic interaction in breathy voice.
        in: Titze IR Scherer RC Vocal fold physiology: biomechanics, acoustics and phonatory control. Proceedings of the international conference on physiology and biophysics of the voice, Iowa City, Iowa, 1983. Denver Center for the Performing Arts, Denver1985: 465-481
        • Karlsson I
        Glottal waveforms for normal female speakers.
        Quart Prog Stat Rept. 1985; 1: 31-36
        • Koike Y
        • Hirano M
        Glottal-area time function and subglottal pressure variation.
        J Acoust Soc Am. 1973; 54: 1618-1627
        • Sodersten M
        • Lindestad PA
        Vocal fold closure in young adult normal-speaking females.
        Phoneatric and Logopedic Progress Report: Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm. 1987; 5: 12-29
        • Fant G
        Glottal source and excitation analysis.
        Quart Prog Stat Rept. 1979; 1: 85-107